Re: Possible values for \\inputenconding

2006-08-07 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "José" == José Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: José> On Sunday 06 August 2006 19:38, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >> I guess it made sense at the time when some installations relied on >> mltex, which understands latin1 natively. I do not think anyone >> uses latex2e without the inputenc pa

Re: Possible values for \\inputenconding

2006-08-07 Thread José Matos
On Sunday 06 August 2006 19:38, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > I guess it made sense at the time when some installations relied on > mltex, which understands latin1 natively. I do not think anyone uses > latex2e without the inputenc package now. What you are saying is that default means input enc

Re: Possible values for \\inputenconding

2006-08-06 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Jose'" == Jose' Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Jose'> - default, use latex default (this does not seem very Jose'> portable). I guess that Jean-Marc knows the reason why we keep Jose'> this option... Jose'> I am working in the lyx2lyx module to convert to utf-8 so I Jose'> need to k

Re: Possible values for \\inputenconding

2006-08-02 Thread Jose' Matos
On Wednesday 02 August 2006 01:37, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Jose' Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > | Hi, > | probably Lars knows the answer to this question. :-) > | > | What is the difference between default and auto as values of > | \\inputenconding? > > Do we have both? Are they d

Re: Possible values for \\inputenconding

2006-08-01 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Jose' Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Hi, | probably Lars knows the answer to this question. :-) | | What is the difference between default and auto as values of | \\inputenconding? Do we have both? Are they different? | | The code is not terribly clear. :-) What code?

Possible values for \\inputenconding

2006-08-01 Thread Jose' Matos
Hi, probably Lars knows the answer to this question. :-) What is the difference between default and auto as values of \\inputenconding? The code is not terribly clear. :-) When did we change this code? I suppose it was in 0.12, if so I should take care of it in