Re: Potential 1.4 patches

> "Bennett" == Bennett Helm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Bennett> Attached -- with nothing done to the Changelog, right? ... Or Bennett> do you want me to do that? I added a terse changelog entry for 1.4.x. Thanks. JMarc

Re: [patch] Re: Potential 1.4 patches

Martin Vermeer wrote: > > The attached patch fixes that. I think it could also go in 1.4.1. > > What do you think? > > Looks sane. OK, it's in trunk now. Jürgen

Re: [patch] Re: Potential 1.4 patches

On Sat, Mar 25, 2006 at 04:39:22PM +0100, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: > Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: > > [1] there's one minor issue that I haven't reported yet. With the patch, my > > "move cursor while deleting in change tracking mode" fix is limited in that > > it now "hangs" at paragraph breaks.

[patch] Re: Potential 1.4 patches

Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: > [1] there's one minor issue that I haven't reported yet. With the patch, my > "move cursor while deleting in change tracking mode" fix is limited in that > it now "hangs" at paragraph breaks. But this can be fixed later. The attached patch fixes that. I think it could

Re: Potential 1.4 patches

> "Juergen" == Juergen Spitzmueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Juergen> Georg Baum wrote: >> > When it is done, Lars parlist patch can be merged too (please >> someone > do it). >> >> I did that. Juergen> You just beat me to it ;-) Thanks to both of you. >> > Do you think we could plan a

Re: Potential 1.4 patches

Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: > > I did that. > > You just beat me to it ;-) But since I have already written the ChangeLogs, I've committed them. Jürgen

Re: Potential 1.4 patches

Georg Baum wrote: > > When it is done, Lars parlist patch can be merged too (please someone > > do it). > > I did that. You just beat me to it ;-) > > Do you think we could plan a release for next friday? > > Yes. I think so, too. Jürgen

Re: Potential 1.4 patches

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > When it is done, Lars parlist patch can be merged too (please someone > do it). I did that. > Then what remains is the speedup patch, and I'd be glad to see someone > apply it too. Since I don't know which one was meant exactly I did not touch this. > Do you thin

Re: Potential 1.4 patches

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > If it is OK, can you please apply it? Done. Jürgen

Re: Potential 1.4 patches

On Mar 24, 2006, at 10:48 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: "Bennett" == Bennett Helm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Bennett> On Mar 24, 2006, at 9:17 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Also, what are the other bugs that we have to fix before 1.4.1? The one I can think about now is the adaptation of

Re: Potential 1.4 patches

> "Jean-Marc" == Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > "Juergen" == Juergen Spitzmueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Juergen> Georg Baum wrote: >>> and then redo the changes in CutAndPaset.C by hand. IIRC it was >>> only at 4 places, it took me two minutes to do that. Juergen

Re: Potential 1.4 patches

Also sprach Jean-Marc Lasgouttes: > OK, let's apply bug880 first. I took your patch in the bug. Is that > right? Yes. > And is the following ChageLog complete? Apart from the one entry below, yes (I think). Jürgen > Index: src/ChangeLog > ===

Re: Potential 1.4 patches

> "Bennett" == Bennett Helm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Bennett> On Mar 24, 2006, at 9:17 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >> Also, what are the other bugs that we have to fix before 1.4.1? The >> one I can think about now is the adaptation of 1.3 layout files to >> 1.4. Others? Bennett> How a

Re: Potential 1.4 patches

On Mar 24, 2006, at 9:17 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Also, what are the other bugs that we have to fix before 1.4.1? The one I can think about now is the adaptation of 1.3 layout files to 1.4. Others? How about this: ?

Re: Potential 1.4 patches

> "Juergen" == Juergen Spitzmueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Juergen> Georg Baum wrote: >> and then redo the changes in CutAndPaset.C by hand. IIRC it was >> only at 4 places, it took me two minutes to do that. Juergen> Please note that if you intend the ct patch also, there are Juergen> s

Re: Potential 1.4 patches

Georg Baum wrote: > and then redo the changes in CutAndPaset.C by hand. IIRC it was only at 4 > places, it took me two minutes to do that. Please note that if you intend the ct patch also, there are some additional changes in text.C (IIRC), which are not needed (and do not apply) without that pa

Re: Potential 1.4 patches

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Shall I use the version you sent, or shall we try to adapt Lars' > latest version? I'd say use Lars' version to be sure that they are in sync: svn merge -r13466:13467 svn+ssh://svn.lyx.org/lyx/lyx-devel/trunk and then redo the changes in CutAndPaset.C by hand. IIRC

Re: Potential 1.4 patches

> "Georg" == Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Georg> I do use the paragraph list since some days and did not Georg> discover problems so far (although I did no real testing). Shall I use the version you sent, or shall we try to adapt Lars' latest version? JMarc

Re: Potential 1.4 patches

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > So Michael, Juergen, Marting, Georg, others, what do you think of > these patches? I know It is not the first time I ask, but one never > knows :) I told you about the ct patch already. I have applied the paragraph list patch to my tree (1.4svn) and didn't encounter

Re: Potential 1.4 patches

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > There is a choice to do right now: either we try to get 1.4.1 out as > soon as possible or we try to make it better. I am ready to make the > bet that we can apply these three patches and that they will work well > enough to be better than the current situation. But I

Re: Potential 1.4 patches

> "Michael" == Michael Gerz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Michael> Hi, my new hobby-horse: Keeping track of patches to the trunk Michael> that may also be relevant for LyX 1.4.X :-) That is a very good idea. Did you apply them to a tree and test them out? This would be even better... Michael>

Re: Potential 1.4 patches

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > What is your opinion about this patch? Is it really ready? I could be > coaxed into putting it in 1.4.1. Yes, my opinion is that is is ready. I have tested it quite a bit and thanks to Martins patience and effort, I am not aware of any major problem anymore in this

Re: Potential 1.4 patches

> "Juergen" == Juergen Spitzmueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Juergen> Am Freitag, 24. März 2006 00:38 schrieb Michael Gerz: >> Change Tracking >> >> r13339 - Fix bug 880, or the multi-paragraph change tracking patch >> r13356 - fix painting of change bar with only paragraph break >> change

Re: Potential 1.4 patches

Am Freitag, 24. März 2006 00:38 schrieb Michael Gerz: > Change Tracking > > r13339 - Fix bug 880, or the multi-paragraph change tracking patch > r13356 - fix painting of change bar with only paragraph break changed > r13385 - Change tracking -related bug fixes (reported by Juergen) > r13408 - fix s

Potential 1.4 patches

Hi, my new hobby-horse: Keeping track of patches to the trunk that may also be relevant for LyX 1.4.X :-) Michael = Change Tracking r13339 - Fix bug 880, or the multi-paragraph change tracking patch r13356 - fix painting of change bar with