Re: statement paper quandary

1999-08-21 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Allan Rae [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | Can you suggest a good place to send it to? | | comp..tex comp.text.tex Perhaps ask why statement size is not in base classes instead of posting a bug report? Lgb

Re: statement paper quandary

1999-08-21 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Allan Rae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > Can you suggest a good place to send it to? | | comp..tex comp.text.tex Perhaps ask why statement size is not in base classes instead of posting a bug report? Lgb

Custom pagesize printing bugs (was Re: statement paper quandary)

1999-08-19 Thread Allan Rae
On Thu, 19 Aug 1999, Allan Rae wrote: There is a major problem with lyx handling of custom paper sizes when exporting to postscript. In fact, LyX exports to the default paper size! If I run from the command line "dvips -o out.ps -T5.5in,8.5in out.dvi" then the exported ps file uses

RE: statement paper quandary

1999-08-19 Thread Juergen Vigna
Hi Garst! On 18-Aug-99 Garst R. Reese wrote: I am at a loss of how to best solve this problem. At present, it is virtually impossible to use an unpatched LyX to produce a book in the (North American) common 5.5in x 8.5in format. I say virtually, because in order to preview the book I must

Custom pagesize printing bugs (was Re: statement paper quandary)

1999-08-19 Thread Allan Rae
On Thu, 19 Aug 1999, Allan Rae wrote: > > There is a major problem with lyx handling of custom paper sizes when > exporting to postscript. In fact, LyX exports to the default paper size! > If I run from the command line "dvips -o out.ps -T5.5in,8.5in out.dvi" > then the exported ps file uses

RE: statement paper quandary

1999-08-19 Thread Juergen Vigna
Hi Garst! On 18-Aug-99 Garst R. Reese wrote: > I am at a loss of how to best solve this problem. > At present, it is virtually impossible to use an unpatched LyX to > produce a book in the (North American) common 5.5in x 8.5in format. I > say virtually, because in order to preview the book I

Re: statement paper quandary

1999-08-18 Thread Allan Rae
On Wed, 18 Aug 1999, Garst R. Reese wrote: I am at a loss of how to best solve this problem. At present, it is virtually impossible to use an unpatched LyX to produce a book in the (North American) common 5.5in x 8.5in format. I say virtually, because in order to preview the book I must

Re: statement paper quandary

1999-08-18 Thread Garst R. Reese
Allan Rae wrote: On Wed, 18 Aug 1999, Garst R. Reese wrote: I am at a loss of how to best solve this problem. At present, it is virtually impossible to use an unpatched LyX to produce a book in the (North American) common 5.5in x 8.5in format. I say virtually, because in order to

Re: statement paper quandary

1999-08-18 Thread Allan Rae
On Thu, 19 Aug 1999, Garst R. Reese wrote: Allan Rae wrote: Did you try using a custom paper size? Layout-Paper-PaperSize{custom} and setting the paper height and width by hand. Yes, and I just this afternoon tried again with the book.cls from teTeX-1.0 without my changes. If I simply set

Re: statement paper quandary

1999-08-18 Thread Allan Rae
On Wed, 18 Aug 1999, Garst R. Reese wrote: > I am at a loss of how to best solve this problem. At present, it is > virtually impossible to use an unpatched LyX to produce a book in the > (North American) common 5.5in x 8.5in format. I say virtually, because > in order to preview the book I must

Re: statement paper quandary

1999-08-18 Thread Garst R. Reese
Allan Rae wrote: > > On Wed, 18 Aug 1999, Garst R. Reese wrote: > > > I am at a loss of how to best solve this problem. At present, it is > > virtually impossible to use an unpatched LyX to produce a book in the > > (North American) common 5.5in x 8.5in format. I say virtually, because > > in

Re: statement paper quandary

1999-08-18 Thread Allan Rae
On Thu, 19 Aug 1999, Garst R. Reese wrote: > Allan Rae wrote: > > Did you try using a custom paper size? Layout->Paper->PaperSize{custom} > > and setting the paper height and width by hand. > Yes, and I just this afternoon tried again with the book.cls from > teTeX-1.0 without my changes. If I