Le 05/05/11 00:26, Andre Poenitz a écrit :
However, I personally think of it as a means to lower psychological
barriers, allowing to postpone the personal mental switch or to
overcome technical or political restrictions like the ones you
mentioned, but not as a long-term prefered way of working.
On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 09:45:04AM -0600, Rob Oakes wrote:
> With all that said, I did have a question regarding our existing
> infrastructure. Whatever model we end up settling on, would it be
> possible to mirror the git master branch to SVN? (Basically the same
> thing we do for the git users,
On May 4, 2011, at 2:50 PM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
> Probably not, but I don't understand the problem here. What are these
> branches about ?
They are packaging branches. Launchpad (Ubuntu's development website and
package management system) provides tools to import code from developer
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 5:45 PM, Rob Oakes wrote:
> Dear Developers,
>
> I've been following the debate regarding development models with some
> interest. It sounds as though some people are ready to move to git now.
> While I'm not thrilled about that (I don't care for git very much), I think
Dear Developers,
I've been following the debate regarding development models with some interest.
It sounds as though some people are ready to move to git now. While I'm not
thrilled about that (I don't care for git very much), I think it makes a lot of
good sense. A move to a distributed model
