On 01/08/2016 12:24 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 08, 2016 at 03:33:01AM -0800, José Matos wrote:
>> On Wednesday, November 11, 2015 06:56:12 PM Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>>> Yes file format freeze is before RC. Feature freeze will be before beta.
>>> For discussion see:
>>>
On Wednesday, November 11, 2015 06:56:12 PM Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> Yes file format freeze is before RC. Feature freeze will be before beta.
> For discussion see:
> https://www.mail-archive.com/search?l=mid=20151022164521.GA4654%40cotopaxi
> .att.net
>
> Scott
Hi Scott,
apologies for
On Fri, Jan 08, 2016 at 03:33:01AM -0800, José Matos wrote:
> On Wednesday, November 11, 2015 06:56:12 PM Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > Yes file format freeze is before RC. Feature freeze will be before beta.
> > For discussion see:
> >
Le 05/12/2015 21:41, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 08:26:35PM +, Guillaume Munch wrote:
is it
possible to implement the format change (which I feel is stable now) for
2.2.0 and implement the polished visible changes in 2.2.1 or 2.2.2?
I am fine with this but I'd like
On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 08:26:35PM +, Guillaume Munch wrote:
> Le 30/11/2015 10:59, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
> >Uwe will be away in two weeks. The last day he will be able to build an
> >installer is December 11, which to me means we should plan on the last
> >day being December 10, just in
On 12/05/2015 04:41 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 08:26:35PM +, Guillaume Munch wrote: >> is it >>
> possible to implement the format change (which I feel is
stable now) for >> 2.2.0 and implement the polished visible changes in
2.2.1 or 2.2.2? > > I am fine with this
Le 05/12/15 22:41, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
is it
possible to implement the format change (which I feel is stable now) for
2.2.0 and implement the polished visible changes in 2.2.1 or 2.2.2?
I am fine with this but I'd like to get a +1 from someone else. Have we
done this in the past? It
Le 30/11/2015 10:59, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
On Sun, Nov 29, 2015 at 08:44:34PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Le 29/11/2015 16:39, Richard Heck a écrit :
I'd suggest beta in two weeks if we don't run into any serious problems,
then see how that goes. If well, then we can shoot for RC in
On Sun, Nov 29, 2015 at 08:44:34PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Le 29/11/2015 16:39, Richard Heck a écrit :
> >I'd suggest beta in two weeks if we don't run into any serious problems,
> >then see how that goes. If well, then we can shoot for RC in mid-January.
>
> This looks good to me.
Le 29/11/2015 16:39, Richard Heck a écrit :
I'd suggest beta in two weeks if we don't run into any serious problems,
then see how that goes. If well, then we can shoot for RC in mid-January.
This looks good to me.
JMarc
On 11/29/2015 01:26 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 28, 2015 at 09:13:46PM -0500, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 07:49:24PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>>>
>>> Le 11 novembre 2015 19:10:05 GMT+01:00, Scott Kostyshak
>>> a écrit :
What
On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 07:49:24PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>
>
> Le 11 novembre 2015 19:10:05 GMT+01:00, Scott Kostyshak a
> écrit :
> >What stage(s) would you propose making shorter?
>
> All of them ? :)
>
> Seriously, we'll see what happens. We should go as
On Sat, Nov 28, 2015 at 09:13:46PM -0500, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 07:49:24PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> >
> >
> > Le 11 novembre 2015 19:10:05 GMT+01:00, Scott Kostyshak
> > a écrit :
> > >What stage(s) would you propose making shorter?
> >
Pavel Sanda wrote:
> I agree with JMarc that we could be flexible WRT shortcuting the dates in
> case things look good, but I also know that all plans we ever had for our
> releases were delayed. Let's see :)
Yes, the plans get always delayed. Therefore I'd like a schedule with about
3 weeks
On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 07:04:42PM +0100, Georg Baum wrote:
> Pavel Sanda wrote:
>
> > I agree with JMarc that we could be flexible WRT shortcuting the dates in
> > case things look good, but I also know that all plans we ever had for our
> > releases were delayed. Let's see :)
>
> Yes, the
On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 01:20:35PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Le 11/11/2015 09:02, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
> >Below is a tentative schedule for releasing 2.2.0. I think the schedule
> >is slightly on the aggressive side, and that is because I think the
> >state of our master branch is
Le 11/11/2015 09:02, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
Below is a tentative schedule for releasing 2.2.0. I think the schedule
is slightly on the aggressive side, and that is because I think the
state of our master branch is already relatively stable.
alpha: tag and tar this week and announce this
Le 11/11/2015 08:02, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
Below is a tentative schedule for releasing 2.2.0. I think the schedule
is slightly on the aggressive side, and that is because I think the
state of our master branch is already relatively stable.
alpha: tag and tar this week and announce this
On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 1:45 AM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Liviu Andronic wrote:
>> no major crashes. Unless we have major issues that need addressed and
>> fixed prior to this major release, I think the general hope around is
>> that we get an RC and even the actual release by the end
Liviu Andronic wrote:
> no major crashes. Unless we have major issues that need addressed and
> fixed prior to this major release, I think the general hope around is
> that we get an RC and even the actual release by the end of the year,
> or perhaps very early next year.
I do not think that 1.5
On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 12:01:40AM +0100, Liviu Andronic wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 7:10 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 01:20:35PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> >> Le 11/11/2015 09:02, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
> >> >Below is a tentative
On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 12:03:19PM +, Guillaume Munch wrote:
> Le 11/11/2015 08:02, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
> >Below is a tentative schedule for releasing 2.2.0. I think the schedule
> >is slightly on the aggressive side, and that is because I think the
> >state of our master branch is
Le 11 novembre 2015 19:10:05 GMT+01:00, Scott Kostyshak a
écrit :
>What stage(s) would you propose making shorter?
All of them ? :)
Seriously, we'll see what happens. We should go as fast as possible but not
more.
JMarc
On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 7:10 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 01:20:35PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> Le 11/11/2015 09:02, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
>> >Below is a tentative schedule for releasing 2.2.0. I think the schedule
>> >is slightly on the
Below is a tentative schedule for releasing 2.2.0. I think the schedule
is slightly on the aggressive side, and that is because I think the
state of our master branch is already relatively stable.
alpha: tag and tar this week and announce this weekend or Monday
beta: beginning of January
RC: end
25 matches
Mail list logo