Re: Test results for 2.2.0dev on Mac

Am 29.01.2016 um 22:15 schrieb Georg Baum : > > Stephan Witt wrote: > >> Am 24.01.2016 um 19:08 schrieb Georg Baum >> : >>> >>> This is the idea, yes, but before implementing it I'd like to know >>> whether it works in principle.

Re: Test results for 2.2.0dev on Mac

Stephan Witt wrote: > After applying the patches I get: > > $ (cd lyx-build/cmake/2.2.0dev;ctest -C debug -R tex2lyx) > Test project /Users/stephan/git/lyx-build/cmake/2.2.0dev > > … > > 86% tests passed, 4 tests failed out of 28 > > Label Time Summary: > cmplyx = 21.45 sec (14 tests)

Re: Test results for 2.2.0dev on Mac

Stephan Witt wrote: > Am 24.01.2016 um 19:08 schrieb Georg Baum > : >> >> This is the idea, yes, but before implementing it I'd like to know >> whether it works in principle. This would require a two step approach for >> the case that no command line option is

Re: Test results for 2.2.0dev on Mac

Am 24.01.2016 um 14:50 schrieb Georg Baum : > > Stephan Witt wrote: > >> Am 24.01.2016 um 13:00 schrieb Stephan Witt : >> I’ve tried to follow the tokenizing and parsing program flow. >> >> While processing the „latin1“ option of „inputenc“ the

Re: Test results for 2.2.0dev on Mac

Stephan Witt wrote: > For latin1 documents (e.g. algo2e.tex) it works better. The test now > passed. > > For CJK.lex it’s obviously a problem: > $ /Users/stephan/git/lyx-build/cmake/2.2.0dev/bin/Debug/tex2lyx -f > -roundtrip /Users/stephan/git/lyx/src/tex2lyx/test/CJK.tex >

Re: Test results for 2.2.0dev on Mac

Stephan Witt wrote: > You are asking for running tex2lyx in the debugger? Yes, I’m able to do > so. What should I try exactly? > > I started tex2lyx in debugger with these options: > -f > -roundtrip > /Users/stephan/git/lyx/src/tex2lyx/test/algo2e.tex > /Users/stephan/git/lyx-build/algo2e.lyx >

Re: Test results for 2.2.0dev on Mac

Am 24.01.2016 um 13:00 schrieb Stephan Witt : > > Am 24.01.2016 um 12:12 schrieb Georg Baum : >> >> Stephan Witt wrote: >> >>> You are asking for running tex2lyx in the debugger? Yes, I’m able to do >>> so. What should I try exactly? >>> >>> I

Re: Test results for 2.2.0dev on Mac

Stephan Witt wrote: > Am 24.01.2016 um 13:00 schrieb Stephan Witt : > I’ve tried to follow the tokenizing and parsing program flow. > > While processing the „latin1“ option of „inputenc“ the encoding of > the idocstream is changed. (Line 395 of support/docstream.cpp is called) >

Re: Test results for 2.2.0dev on Mac

Stephan Witt wrote: > Yes, we shouldn’t change that on the fly. If we change it we have to > provide a migration path to copy the current contents to the new location. > Not very difficult but a change in configure.py would be required. > > Since we don’t want to use different settings for Lyx,

Re: Test results for 2.2.0dev on Mac

Am 24.01.2016 um 12:12 schrieb Georg Baum : > > Stephan Witt wrote: > >> You are asking for running tex2lyx in the debugger? Yes, I’m able to do >> so. What should I try exactly? >> >> I started tex2lyx in debugger with these options: >> -f >> -roundtrip >>

Re: Test results for 2.2.0dev on Mac

Am 24.01.2016 um 15:07 schrieb Georg Baum : > > Stephan Witt wrote: > >> Yes, we shouldn’t change that on the fly. If we change it we have to >> provide a migration path to copy the current contents to the new location. >> Not very difficult but a change in

Re: Test results for 2.2.0dev on Mac

Stephan Witt wrote: > ATM, the directory LyX is using is "$HOME/Library/Application > Support/PACKAGE“ > > PACKAGE is LyX-2.2 on Mac when version suffix „-2.2“ is used. Looks like QtApplication does something different here than QtCoreApplication. >> Stephan, does it work? Note that this is

Re: Test results for 2.2.0dev on Mac

Am 24.01.2016 um 12:02 schrieb Georg Baum : > > Stephan Witt wrote: > >> ATM, the directory LyX is using is "$HOME/Library/Application >> Support/PACKAGE“ >> >> PACKAGE is LyX-2.2 on Mac when version suffix „-2.2“ is used. > > Looks like QtApplication does

Re: Test results for 2.2.0dev on Mac

Scott Kostyshak wrote: > Do I understand correctly that this issue is no longer a beta blocker or > is there still something that needs to be done here before beta? The original reason why I viewed it as beta blocker (general user or sytem directory problems) turned out to be wrong. I would

Re: Test results for 2.2.0dev on Mac

Am 24.01.2016 um 18:17 schrieb Georg Baum : > > Scott Kostyshak wrote: > >> Do I understand correctly that this issue is no longer a beta blocker or >> is there still something that needs to be done here before beta? > > The original reason why I viewed it as

Re: Test results for 2.2.0dev on Mac

On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 03:36:09PM +0100, Georg Baum wrote: > OK, but I don't think it is too important to know whether the old compiler > did handle that. There is a FIXME near the imbue call anyway, since we do > not know whether it is standard conforming what we do there. > > I'll have a

Re: Test results for 2.2.0dev on Mac

Am 24.01.2016 um 19:08 schrieb Georg Baum : > > Stephan Witt wrote: > >> Am 24.01.2016 um 18:17 schrieb Georg Baum >> : >>> >>> Stephan, does the algo2e.tex test succeed if you apply the attached patch >>> on a clean tree? >> >>

Re: Test results for 2.2.0dev on Mac

Stephan Witt wrote: > Am 24.01.2016 um 18:17 schrieb Georg Baum > : >> >> Stephan, does the algo2e.tex test succeed if you apply the attached patch >> on a clean tree? > > No, it doesn’t work. With the patch I get: It turned out that we used two different names

Re: Test results for 2.2.0dev on Mac

On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 06:17:18PM +0100, Georg Baum wrote: > Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > > Do I understand correctly that this issue is no longer a beta blocker or > > is there still something that needs to be done here before beta? > > The original reason why I viewed it as beta blocker

Re: Test results for 2.2.0dev on Mac

Am 22.01.2016 um 22:32 schrieb Georg Baum : > > Stephan Witt wrote: > >> No. It’s not wrong. You’re right with the use of the _own_ userdir >> for tests. But the real life matters too. It’s the wrong userdir >> for standard orpeation. And this is Georg message,

Re: Test results for 2.2.0dev on Mac

> Am 22.01.2016 um 21:54 schrieb Georg Baum : > > Stephan Witt wrote: > >> $ lyx-build/cmake/2.2.0dev/bin/Debug/tex2lyx >> tex2lyx: Not enough arguments. >> Usage: tex2lyx [options] infile.tex [outfile.lyx] >> … >> -sysdir SYSDIR Set system directory to

Re: Test results for 2.2.0dev on Mac

Stephan Witt wrote: > There is some change required because tex2lyx has the same problem itself. > I’ve changed this for the lyx binary here: > > http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/6e9bd23/lyxgit > > Attached is a similar change to correct it for tex2lyx. Ok to commit? I do not understand why

Re: Test results for 2.2.0dev on Mac

Am 22.01.2016 um 21:01 schrieb Georg Baum : > > Stephan Witt wrote: > >> There is some change required because tex2lyx has the same problem itself. >> I’ve changed this for the lyx binary here: >> >> http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/6e9bd23/lyxgit >> >>

Re: Test results for 2.2.0dev on Mac

Stephan Witt wrote: > $ lyx-build/cmake/2.2.0dev/bin/Debug/tex2lyx > tex2lyx: Not enough arguments. > Usage: tex2lyx [options] infile.tex [outfile.lyx] > … > -sysdir SYSDIR Set system directory to SYSDIR. > Default: /Users/stephan/git/lyx/lib/ > -userdir USERDIR Set user directory to

Re: Test results for 2.2.0dev on Mac

Am Freitag, 22. Januar 2016 um 21:01:42, schrieb Georg Baum > Stephan Witt wrote: > > > There is some change required because tex2lyx has the same problem itself. > > I’ve changed this for the lyx binary here: > > > >

Re: Test results for 2.2.0dev on Mac

Stephan Witt wrote: >> Am 22.01.2016 um 05:43 schrieb Scott Kostyshak : >> >> Note that if this is a regression and if the tex2lyx test used to work >> before, it would be very easy to do a 'git bisect'. It could be done >> automatically by doing 'git bisect run' (When a ctest

Re: Test results for 2.2.0dev on Mac

Stephan Witt wrote: > Am 22.01.2016 um 21:01 schrieb Georg Baum > : >> >> Stephan Witt wrote: >> >>> There is some change required because tex2lyx has the same problem >>> itself. I’ve changed this for the lyx binary here: >>> >>>

Re: Test results for 2.2.0dev on Mac

Stephan Witt wrote: > No. It’s not wrong. You’re right with the use of the _own_ userdir > for tests. But the real life matters too. It’s the wrong userdir > for standard orpeation. And this is Georg message, IMO. Yes. Also, depending on the reaason for the wrong default user dir, also the

Re: Test results for 2.2.0dev on Mac

Am 21.01.2016 um 22:24 schrieb Georg Baum : > > Stephan Witt wrote: > >> $ lyx-build/cmake/2.2.0dev/bin/Debug/tex2lyx >> tex2lyx: Not enough arguments. >> Usage: tex2lyx [options] infile.tex [outfile.lyx] >> … >> -sysdir SYSDIR Set system directory to SYSDIR.

Re: Test results for 2.2.0dev on Mac

Am 22.01.2016 um 12:16 schrieb Kornel Benko : > > Am Donnerstag, 21. Januar 2016 um 22:24:58, schrieb Georg Baum > >> Stephan Witt wrote: >> >>> $ lyx-build/cmake/2.2.0dev/bin/Debug/tex2lyx >>> tex2lyx: Not enough arguments. >>> Usage: tex2lyx

Re: Test results for 2.2.0dev on Mac

Am Donnerstag, 21. Januar 2016 um 22:24:58, schrieb Georg Baum > Stephan Witt wrote: > > > $ lyx-build/cmake/2.2.0dev/bin/Debug/tex2lyx > > tex2lyx: Not enough arguments. > > Usage: tex2lyx [options] infile.tex [outfile.lyx] > > … > > -sysdir SYSDIR Set

Re: Test results for 2.2.0dev on Mac

Am Freitag, 22. Januar 2016 um 13:34:41, schrieb Stephan Witt > >> Ah, now we are getting somewhere. The systemdir is fine, the userdir is > >> wrong. It should be > >> > >> /Users/stephan/Library/Application Support/LyX/ > > > > Wrong. For tests we use _own_ userdir

Re: Test results for 2.2.0dev on Mac

Stephan Witt wrote: > $ lyx-build/cmake/2.2.0dev/bin/Debug/tex2lyx > tex2lyx: Not enough arguments. > Usage: tex2lyx [options] infile.tex [outfile.lyx] > … > -sysdir SYSDIR Set system directory to SYSDIR. > Default: /Users/stephan/git/lyx/lib/ > -userdir USERDIR Set user directory to

Re: Test results for 2.2.0dev on Mac

> Am 22.01.2016 um 05:43 schrieb Scott Kostyshak : > > On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 10:24:58PM +0100, Georg Baum wrote: > >> Does LyX itself tell the correct userdir for both cases? I am now pretty >> sure that support::Package or some related code is broken on OS X, at least >>

Re: Test results for 2.2.0dev on Mac

On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 10:24:58PM +0100, Georg Baum wrote: > Does LyX itself tell the correct userdir for both cases? I am now pretty > sure that support::Package or some related code is broken on OS X, at least > for tex2lyx, which means that this is not only a minor test issue, but a > beta

Re: Test results for 2.2.0dev on Mac

> Am 20.01.2016 um 22:31 schrieb Georg Baum : > > Kornel Benko wrote: > >> Am Mittwoch, 20. Januar 2016 um 06:58:20, schrieb Georg Baum >> >>> Stephan Witt wrote: >>> Me too - I really meant *somewhere* - perhaps

Re: Test results for 2.2.0dev on Mac

Kornel Benko wrote: > Am Mittwoch, 20. Januar 2016 um 06:58:20, schrieb Georg Baum > >> Stephan Witt wrote: >> >> > Me too - I really meant *somewhere* - >> > perhaps tex2lyx reads some file from outside the build directory. >> >> No. It reads from the system

Re: Test results for 2.2.0dev on Mac

Am Dienstag, 19. Januar 2016 um 14:10:09, schrieb Scott Kostyshak > On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 08:10:59AM +0100, Stephan Witt wrote: > > > I have this: > > > > $ cat > > /Users/stephan/git/lyx-build/cmake/2.2.0dev/Testing/.lyx/layouts/testalgorithm2e.layout > > > > #% Do not

Re: Test results for 2.2.0dev on Mac

Am Dienstag, 19. Januar 2016 um 08:10:59, schrieb Stephan Witt > Am 19.01.2016 um 05:13 schrieb Scott Kostyshak : > > > > On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 09:53:26PM +0100, Stephan Witt wrote: > >> Am 18.01.2016 um 21:48 schrieb Kornel Benko : > >>> >

Re: Test results for 2.2.0dev on Mac

Am Mittwoch, 20. Januar 2016 um 06:58:20, schrieb Georg Baum > Stephan Witt wrote: > > > Am 19.01.2016 um 20:10 schrieb Scott Kostyshak : > >> > >> On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 08:10:59AM +0100, Stephan Witt wrote: > >> > >>> BTW, when debugging

Re: Test results for 2.2.0dev on Mac

Am 19.01.2016 um 20:10 schrieb Scott Kostyshak : > > On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 08:10:59AM +0100, Stephan Witt wrote: > >> I have this: >> >> $ cat >> /Users/stephan/git/lyx-build/cmake/2.2.0dev/Testing/.lyx/layouts/testalgorithm2e.layout >> >> #% Do not delete the line below;

Re: Test results for 2.2.0dev on Mac

On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 08:10:59AM +0100, Stephan Witt wrote: > I have this: > > $ cat > /Users/stephan/git/lyx-build/cmake/2.2.0dev/Testing/.lyx/layouts/testalgorithm2e.layout > > #% Do not delete the line below; configure depends on this > # \DeclareLaTeXClass{testalgorithm2e} > Format 55

Re: Test results for 2.2.0dev on Mac

Stephan Witt wrote: > Am 19.01.2016 um 20:10 schrieb Scott Kostyshak : >> >> On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 08:10:59AM +0100, Stephan Witt wrote: >> >>> BTW, when debugging tex2lyx it complains about missing USERDIR and I >>> have to add -userdir >>>

Re: Test results for 2.2.0dev on Mac

On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 09:53:26PM +0100, Stephan Witt wrote: > Am 18.01.2016 um 21:48 schrieb Kornel Benko : > > > > Am Montag, 18. Januar 2016 um 15:26:06, schrieb Scott Kostyshak > > > >> On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 09:23:47PM +0100, Stephan Witt wrote: > >>>

Re: Test results for 2.2.0dev on Mac

Am 19.01.2016 um 05:13 schrieb Scott Kostyshak : > > On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 09:53:26PM +0100, Stephan Witt wrote: >> Am 18.01.2016 um 21:48 schrieb Kornel Benko : >>> >>> Am Montag, 18. Januar 2016 um 15:26:06, schrieb Scott Kostyshak >>>

Re: Test results for 2.2.0dev on Mac

Am 18.01.2016 um 21:48 schrieb Kornel Benko : > > Am Montag, 18. Januar 2016 um 15:26:06, schrieb Scott Kostyshak > >> On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 09:23:47PM +0100, Stephan Witt wrote: >>> Running ctest there are 16 failed tests in tex2lyx. >>> Is this to be

Re: Test results for 2.2.0dev on Mac

On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 09:23:47PM +0100, Stephan Witt wrote: > Running ctest there are 16 failed tests in tex2lyx. > Is this to be expected? I don't think so. All of the tex2lyx tests pass for me. > Where are the details to analyze it further? In the CMake build directory, look at

Test results for 2.2.0dev on Mac

Running ctest there are 16 failed tests in tex2lyx. Is this to be expected? Where are the details to analyze it further? Stephan $ (cd lyx-build/cmake/2.2.0dev;ctest -C debug ) ... 92% tests passed, 16 tests failed out of 202 Label Time Summary: cmplyx = 21.99 sec (14 tests)

Re: Test results for 2.2.0dev on Mac

Am Montag, 18. Januar 2016 um 15:26:06, schrieb Scott Kostyshak > On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 09:23:47PM +0100, Stephan Witt wrote: > > Running ctest there are 16 failed tests in tex2lyx. > > Is this to be expected? > > I don't think so. All of the tex2lyx tests pass for me.