Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> OK, thanks for the explanation. I am not pretending that I will solve
> everything, don't be afraid ;-). We do have an internal in source
> gettext. Couldn't we just support that and live all other version aside?
I'd rather like to get rid of that instead of completely
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Georg Baum wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
This last line in particular looks suspicious. Why do we set environment
variable at each translation request?
Because the environment variable determines what language gettext will
use,
and we don't know what other message
Georg Baum wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
This last line in particular looks suspicious. Why do we set environment
variable at each translation request?
Because the environment variable determines what language gettext will use,
and we don't know what other message was translated before. To
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> This last line in particular looks suspicious. Why do we set environment
> variable at each translation request?
Because the environment variable determines what language gettext will use,
and we don't know what other message was translated before. To my knowledge
no li
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
"Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Abdelrazak> My idea would be to cache the translated text instead of
Abdelrazak> translating each time updateLabels() is called. But I am
Abdelrazak> not
