Re: What about LyX 1.7 instead of 2.0? LyX Meeting?

On Sunday 12 July 2009 19:20:48 Christian Ridderström wrote: Did we have such a page earlier? I don't think so. :-) This is new with this release. :-) I have a vague memory? That I don't know how to answer. ;-) /C -- José Abílio

Re: What about LyX 1.7 instead of 2.0? LyX Meeting?

On Sunday 12 July 2009 19:20:48 Christian Ridderström wrote: > Did we have such a page earlier? I don't think so. :-) This is new with this release. :-) > I have a vague memory? That I don't know how to answer. ;-) > /C -- José Abílio

Re: What about LyX 1.7 instead of 2.0? LyX Meeting?

On Fri, 10 Jul 2009, José Matos wrote: On Thursday 09 July 2009 15:55:13 Abdelrazak Younes wrote: Maybe it'd be good to have a list of feature that we (global we) have still in the pipe. Personally I plan to add hunspell support and to help Vincent with the soon to be disclosed Compare feature

Re: What about LyX 1.7 instead of 2.0? LyX Meeting?

On Fri, 10 Jul 2009, José Matos wrote: On Thursday 09 July 2009 15:55:13 Abdelrazak Younes wrote: Maybe it'd be good to have a list of feature that we (global we) have still in the pipe. Personally I plan to add hunspell support and to help Vincent with the soon to be disclosed "Compare"

Re: What about LyX 1.7 instead of 2.0? LyX Meeting?

Pavel Sanda wrote: Any other items? one more thing i wanted to add is - once Jose decides to choose our release date we should be more strict for allowing branch enhacements. i'm very grateful for Juergen's openness for new features in, but for the last few versions we should avoid

Re: What about LyX 1.7 instead of 2.0? LyX Meeting?

On Friday 10 July 2009 06:53:18 Pavel Sanda wrote: Abdelrazak Younes wrote: What about LyX 1.7 instead of 2.0? i would rather have 1.7 instead of 2.0 actually. 2.0 for xml change looks reasonable. I don't disagree (yeah I know about the problems with double negatives ;-) ). And yes, I

Re: What about LyX 1.7 instead of 2.0? LyX Meeting?

Pavel Sanda wrote: the search and replace feature is imho in a very unfinished state. last tiutme i tried it was extremely slow for bigger documents, full of crashes and disabled 'features'. i even thought whether we disable it for a release since nobody seems to maintain it... I agree about

Re: What about LyX 1.7 instead of 2.0? LyX Meeting?

On Thursday 09 July 2009 15:49:53 rgheck wrote: I've been having similar thoughts, but I don't know if September is reasonable, at least if we want HTML output to be in a usable state. I'm not sure how much time I'll have between now and then. Of course, it could be disabled for 1.7.0 and

Re: What about LyX 1.7 instead of 2.0? LyX Meeting?

On Thursday 09 July 2009 15:55:13 Abdelrazak Younes wrote: Maybe it'd be good to have a list of feature that we (global we) have still in the pipe. Personally I plan to add hunspell support and to help Vincent with the soon to be disclosed Compare feature (Sorry Vincent ;-). I would also like

Re: What about LyX 1.7 instead of 2.0? LyX Meeting?

On Friday 10 July 2009 07:08:25 Pavel Sanda wrote: one more thing i wanted to add is - once Jose decides to choose our release date we should be more strict for allowing branch enhacements. i'm very grateful for Juergen's openness for new features in, but for the last few versions we should

Re: What about LyX 1.7 instead of 2.0? LyX Meeting?

Pavel Sanda wrote: > > Any other items? one more thing i wanted to add is - once Jose decides to choose our release date we should be more strict for allowing branch enhacements. i'm very grateful for Juergen's openness for new features in, but for the last few versions we should avoid

Re: What about LyX 1.7 instead of 2.0? LyX Meeting?

On Friday 10 July 2009 06:53:18 Pavel Sanda wrote: > Abdelrazak Younes wrote: > > What about LyX 1.7 instead of 2.0? > > i would rather have 1.7 instead of 2.0 actually. 2.0 for xml change > looks reasonable. I don't disagree (yeah I know about the problems with double negatives ;-) ). And yes,

Re: What about LyX 1.7 instead of 2.0? LyX Meeting?

Pavel Sanda wrote: the search and replace feature is imho in a very unfinished state. last tiutme i tried it was extremely slow for bigger documents, full of crashes and disabled 'features'. i even thought whether we disable it for a release since nobody seems to maintain it... I agree about

Re: What about LyX 1.7 instead of 2.0? LyX Meeting?

On Thursday 09 July 2009 15:49:53 rgheck wrote: > > I've been having similar thoughts, but I don't know if September is > reasonable, at least if we want HTML output to be in a usable state. I'm > not sure how much time I'll have between now and then. Of course, it > could be disabled for 1.7.0

Re: What about LyX 1.7 instead of 2.0? LyX Meeting?

On Thursday 09 July 2009 15:55:13 Abdelrazak Younes wrote: > Maybe it'd be good to have a list of feature that we (global we) have > still in the pipe. Personally I plan to add hunspell support and to help > Vincent with the soon to be disclosed "Compare" feature (Sorry Vincent > ;-). I would also

Re: What about LyX 1.7 instead of 2.0? LyX Meeting?

On Friday 10 July 2009 07:08:25 Pavel Sanda wrote: > one more thing i wanted to add is - once Jose decides to choose our release > date we should be more strict for allowing branch enhacements. i'm very > grateful for Juergen's openness for new features in, but for the last few > versions we

What about LyX 1.7 instead of 2.0? LyX Meeting?

Hello LyXers, Let's try some pragmatism... It is now pretty obvious that XML won't be done for this release. I propose to start the stabilisation of trunk and to aim for a release in September. What about a meeting to finish 1.7 and really start XML this time? I'd be available between the 27

Re: What about LyX 1.7 instead of 2.0? LyX Meeting?

Abdelrazak Younes wrote: Hello LyXers, Let's try some pragmatism... It is now pretty obvious that XML won't be done for this release. I propose to start the stabilisation of trunk and to aim for a release in September. What about a meeting to finish 1.7 and really start XML this time? I'd

Re: What about LyX 1.7 instead of 2.0? LyX Meeting?

rgheck wrote: Abdelrazak Younes wrote: Hello LyXers, Let's try some pragmatism... It is now pretty obvious that XML won't be done for this release. I propose to start the stabilisation of trunk and to aim for a release in September. What about a meeting to finish 1.7 and really start XML

Re: What about LyX 1.7 instead of 2.0? LyX Meeting?

Abdelrazak Younes you...@lyx.org writes: It is now pretty obvious that XML won't be done for this release. Unless José magically finds time in his busy schedule. I propose to start the stabilisation of trunk and to aim for a release in September. What about a meeting to finish 1.7 and really

Re: What about LyX 1.7 instead of 2.0? LyX Meeting?

Abdelrazak Younes you...@lyx.org writes: Maybe it'd be good to have a list of feature that we (global we) have still in the pipe. Personally I plan to add hunspell support and to help Vincent with the soon to be disclosed Compare feature (Sorry Vincent ;-). I would also like to finish the

Re: What about LyX 1.7 instead of 2.0? LyX Meeting?

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: I propose to start the stabilisation of trunk and to aim for a release in September. What about a meeting to finish 1.7 and really start XML this time? I'd be available between the 27 of July and mid-August personally. I would be OK with 1.7 instead of 2.0.

Re: What about LyX 1.7 instead of 2.0? LyX Meeting?

Abdelrazak Younes wrote: What about LyX 1.7 instead of 2.0? i would rather have 1.7 instead of 2.0 actually. 2.0 for xml change looks reasonable. I've been having similar thoughts, but I don't know if September is reasonable, at least if we want HTML output to be in a usable state. I'm not

What about LyX 1.7 instead of 2.0? LyX Meeting?

Hello LyXers, Let's try some pragmatism... It is now pretty obvious that XML won't be done for this release. I propose to start the stabilisation of trunk and to aim for a release in September. What about a meeting to finish 1.7 and really start XML this time? I'd be available between the 27

Re: What about LyX 1.7 instead of 2.0? LyX Meeting?

Abdelrazak Younes wrote: Hello LyXers, Let's try some pragmatism... It is now pretty obvious that XML won't be done for this release. I propose to start the stabilisation of trunk and to aim for a release in September. What about a meeting to finish 1.7 and really start XML this time? I'd

Re: What about LyX 1.7 instead of 2.0? LyX Meeting?

rgheck wrote: Abdelrazak Younes wrote: Hello LyXers, Let's try some pragmatism... It is now pretty obvious that XML won't be done for this release. I propose to start the stabilisation of trunk and to aim for a release in September. What about a meeting to finish 1.7 and really start XML

Re: What about LyX 1.7 instead of 2.0? LyX Meeting?

Abdelrazak Younes writes: > It is now pretty obvious that XML won't be done for this release. Unless José magically finds time in his busy schedule. > I propose to start the stabilisation of trunk and to aim for a release > in September. What about a meeting to finish 1.7 and

Re: What about LyX 1.7 instead of 2.0? LyX Meeting?

Abdelrazak Younes writes: > Maybe it'd be good to have a list of feature that we (global we) have > still in the pipe. Personally I plan to add hunspell support and to > help Vincent with the soon to be disclosed "Compare" feature (Sorry > Vincent ;-). I would also like to finish

Re: What about LyX 1.7 instead of 2.0? LyX Meeting?

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > I propose to start the stabilisation of trunk and to aim for a release > > in September. What about a meeting to finish 1.7 and really start XML > > this time? I'd be available between the 27 of July and mid-August > > personally. > > I would be OK with 1.7 instead

Re: What about LyX 1.7 instead of 2.0? LyX Meeting?

Abdelrazak Younes wrote: > What about LyX 1.7 instead of 2.0? i would rather have 1.7 instead of 2.0 actually. 2.0 for xml change looks reasonable. >> I've been having similar thoughts, but I don't know if September is >> reasonable, at least if we want HTML output to be in a usable state. I'm