On Thu, Aug 15, 2002 at 10:17:08AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Excellent article. Since you seem to have an inifinite number of those
> URLs, you could maybe add a page for them on our web site, or at least
> a pointer to such a page.
Sure I'll squeeze it into my CFT
regards
john
--
> "John" == John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
John> Sounds very much like the "o Don't suck" pref Havoc talks about
John> :
John> http://www106.pair.com/rhp/free-software-ui.html
Excellent article. Since you seem to have an inifinite number of those
URLs, you could maybe add a page for
On Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 05:48:23PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> We could probably keep both. But the monolithic thing makes it more
> hassle to re-order the panel (see e.g. the bug in bugzilla)
No. Split it up. More work in the beginning, less trouble in the end.
Andre'
--
Those who desire to gi
On Thu, Aug 15, 2002 at 02:13:20PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote:
> Amipro had wonderful user-configurable toolbars.
We (or at least Qt) can easily do hanging icon menus from toolbar items.
> I'm not sure custom
> panels are really going to be that useful -- except as an interim
> solution until mutli
On Thu, 15 Aug 2002, John Levon wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 15, 2002 at 01:42:40PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote:
>
> > > Additionally, the monolithic images make a "my favourite symbols"
> > > dynamic panel a lot harder to do.
> >
> > Not such a bad thing then even if you mean user-defined panel instead
>
> R
On Thu, Aug 15, 2002 at 01:42:40PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote:
> > Additionally, the monolithic images make a "my favourite symbols"
> > dynamic panel a lot harder to do.
>
> Not such a bad thing then even if you mean user-defined panel instead
Right, that's what I'm talking about. Maybe arbitrary
On Wed, 14 Aug 2002, John Levon wrote:
[...]
> Additionally, the monolithic images make a "my favourite symbols"
> dynamic panel a lot harder to do.
Not such a bad thing then even if you mean user-defined panel instead
of one of those super-dumb automatically generated "favourites"
things.
On a
On Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 10:57:20AM -0400, Kuba Ober wrote:
> Wouldn't it be possible to do that at runtime? Load the big thing, paint
> cropped parts into a pixmap, and you seem to be done. That way the (quite
> reasonable) idea of panels is preserved.
This is what (xforms) does already. IT's
On Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 09:53:50AM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> Actually because XPM's are in reality little snippets of C, I would suggest
> to convert whole XBM panels to XPM first, and then add sub-rectangle
> extraction code to them (inside two loops) and run them as programs. That
> will
On wtorek 13 sierpieÅ 2002 02:28 pm, John Levon wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 13, 2002 at 08:24:11PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 13, 2002 at 08:22:29PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> > > But you don't have to fiddle with dialogs to be of help with GUIi.
> >
> > But that's what is mis
On Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 05:27:46PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote:
> You seem to have plenty of free time.
Schein und Sein...
[sort of "Appearances are deceiving", but as German is famous for having
long words...]
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have,
On Wed, 14 Aug 2002, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 04:41:27PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote:
> > Matthias or Kalle did this years ago for KLyX (including the bullets).
>
> I just had a look, there are indeed quite a few more .xbm in KLyX than we
> have.
Hahahaha... "quite a few more" I
On Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 04:41:27PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote:
>
> On Tue, 13 Aug 2002, John Levon wrote:
>
> > Another REALLY boring thing that needs doing is splitting up the math
> > symbol xbm's in to per-symbol xpms so that Qt can use them sensibly
> > (then we have math toolbar - ta da)
>
> M
On Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 04:41:27PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote:
> Matthias or Kalle did this years ago for KLyX (including the bullets).
I just had a look, there are indeed quite a few more .xbm in KLyX than we
have. So any volunteers? ;-}
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to
On Tue, Aug 13, 2002 at 07:28:38PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> Another REALLY boring thing that needs doing is splitting up the math
> symbol xbm's in to per-symbol xpms so that Qt can use them sensibly
Does that mean Qt does not handle xbm's or is the problem "multiple
things in a file"?
Andre
On Tue, 13 Aug 2002, John Levon wrote:
> Another REALLY boring thing that needs doing is splitting up the math
> symbol xbm's in to per-symbol xpms so that Qt can use them sensibly
> (then we have math toolbar - ta da)
Matthias or Kalle did this years ago for KLyX (including the bullets).
There
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| That sounds more interesting...
>
| What is the status of the insettext changes? Have you reverted them so that
| we could have another go?
No, I have had no time for that yet.
--
Lgb
On Tue, Aug 13, 2002 at 07:28:38PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> Another REALLY boring thing that needs doing is splitting up the math
> symbol xbm's in to per-symbol xpms so that Qt can use them sensibly
> (then we have math toolbar - ta da)
Hm.. not today.
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up
On Tue, Aug 13, 2002 at 08:24:11PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 13, 2002 at 08:22:29PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> > But you don't have to fiddle with dialogs to be of help with GUIi.
>
> But that's what is missing in the Qt port, isn't it.
No. (well, yes). One thing that i
On Tue, Aug 13, 2002 at 08:22:29PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> But you don't have to fiddle with dialogs to be of help with GUIi.
But that's what is missing in the Qt port, isn't it.
> Or you can help me with the ParagraphList stuff.
> (have a look at the patch(es) I sent to the list)
T
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Tue, Aug 13, 2002 at 07:10:10PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
>> > I am not suggesting anything new. A few weeks ago this was called "inset
>> > unification"...
>>
>> Well I can/can't wait !
>
| *shrug*
>
| I am more or less done with what I wanted to ha
On Tue, Aug 13, 2002 at 07:10:10PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> > I am not suggesting anything new. A few weeks ago this was called "inset
> > unification"...
>
> Well I can/can't wait !
*shrug*
I am more or less done with what I wanted to have in 1.3 (except for the
world domination...). There i
On Tue, Aug 13, 2002 at 08:08:07PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > especially because we don't want to hardcode it for insertInset only.
>
> I am not suggesting anything new. A few weeks ago this was called "inset
> unification"...
Well I can/can't wait !
john
--
"It is unbecoming for young
On Tue, Aug 13, 2002 at 07:02:35PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> > One should extract an iterator (either from the cursor or from a screen
> > position) and call the function using this iterator.
>
> This sounds very much like an offer to implement such a facility and
> debug all the problems. Super
On Tue, Aug 13, 2002 at 07:25:49PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > Sound sensible ?
>
> No.
>
> Temporary cursor movements to make something happen just because "the
> cursor can do it" is silly.
>
> One should extract an iterator (either from the cursor or from a screen
> position) and call t
On Tue, Aug 13, 2002 at 06:19:55PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> Drag and drop: I propose LFUN_DROP(x,y,string command)
>
> e.g. "reference-insert blah" as command. The question is if we can
> easily do a temporary setCursor() to drop the command in the right
> place, then return the cursor to where
On Tue, Aug 13, 2002 at 07:11:16PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 13, 2002 at 06:01:34PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> > -ENOAPPENDAGE
>
> dispatch(LFUN_MESSAGE, "too late");
how very silly
Drag and drop: I propose LFUN_DROP(x,y,string command)
e.g. "reference-insert blah" as command.
On Tue, Aug 13, 2002 at 06:01:34PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> -ENOAPPENDAGE
dispatch(LFUN_MESSAGE, "too late");
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)
On Tue, Aug 13, 2002 at 06:59:48PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> If nobody complains soon, I'll commit.
-ENOAPPENDAGE
john
--
"It is unbecoming for young men to utter maxims."
- Aristotle
Include John's hint that the 0 dummy arg is ugly.
If nobody complains soon, I'll commit.
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)
30 matches
Mail list logo
