On Wed, 2 May 2007, Andre Poenitz wrote:
FWIW, I have had some weird, spurious, problems with TortoiseSVN when
renaming/moving files/folders. Only had to do a fresh checkout once or
twice though - although sometimes rebooting windows helped. Maybe some
old program was using the file and/or the
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Apparently TortoiseSVN fails when a file has been renamed from
'status.C' to 'status.c' or something like that.
I don't think so.
I stand corrected here, you were right. But what I wrote below is still
correct ;-)
Maybe it's windows that d
Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 04:17:46PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Apparently TortoiseSVN fails when a file has been renamed from
'status.C' to 'status.c' or something like that.
I don't think so.
Maybe it's windows that
doesn't allow renaming wh
On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 04:17:46PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >Apparently TortoiseSVN fails when a file has been renamed from
> >'status.C' to 'status.c' or something like that.
>
> I don't think so.
>
> >Maybe it's windows that
> >doesn't allow renaming when t
Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 03:55:17PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2 May 2007, Helge Hafting wrote:
In my experience it's trial and error. Sometimes it's no longer possible
to just do 'svn update; make', and dist-clean is needed. Or even a fresh
checkout.
Is it e
On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 03:55:17PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Wed, 2 May 2007, Helge Hafting wrote:
>
>
> >> In my experience it's trial and error. Sometimes it's no longer possible
> >> to just do 'svn update; make', and dist-clean is needed. Or even a fresh
> >> checkout.
>
> >Is it
On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 02:30:38PM +0200, Helge Hafting wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >On Wed, 2 May 2007, Hartmut Haase wrote:
> >
> >>Hi Michael,
> >>>I recommend checking out a fresh copy of the complete LyX repository.
> >
> >>I did that, and it works again. That arises the next question.
On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 12:44:23PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Wed, 2 May 2007, Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> >On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 10:11:54AM +0200, Hartmut Haase wrote:
> >>Hi Michael.
> >>>we made a lot of file renamings in the last couple of days. This step
> >>>caused some trouble but
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Apparently TortoiseSVN fails when a file has been renamed from
'status.C' to 'status.c' or something like that.
I don't think so.
Maybe it's windows that
doesn't allow renaming when the change is only case sensitive?
No, Windows doesn't allow status.C and status.c i
On Wed, 2 May 2007, Helge Hafting wrote:
In my experience it's trial and error. Sometimes it's no longer possible
to just do 'svn update; make', and dist-clean is needed. Or even a fresh
checkout.
Is it ever necessary to do the checkout all over again?
"svn update" should get anything tha
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2 May 2007, Hartmut Haase wrote:
Hi Michael,
I recommend checking out a fresh copy of the complete LyX repository.
I did that, and it works again. That arises the next question. if I
do my regular svn updates and somethings happens, how shall I know
if/when
On Wednesday 02 May 2007 11:28:11 Hartmut Haase wrote:
> I did that, and it works again. That arises the next question. if I do my
> regular svn updates and somethings happens, how shall I know if/when I have
> to check out a fresh copy of the complete LyX repository?
If it does not work that me
On Wed, 2 May 2007, Hartmut Haase wrote:
Hi Michael,
I recommend checking out a fresh copy of the complete LyX repository.
I did that, and it works again. That arises the next question. if I do
my regular svn updates and somethings happens, how shall I know if/when
I have to check out a fre
On Wed, 2 May 2007, Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 10:11:54AM +0200, Hartmut Haase wrote:
Hi Michael.
we made a lot of file renamings in the last couple of days. This step
caused some trouble but it was inevitable for the long-term maintenance
of the LyX sources.
I'm not critic
Hi Michael,
> I recommend checking out a fresh copy of the complete LyX repository.
I did that, and it works again. That arises the next question. if I do my
regular svn updates and somethings happens, how shall I know if/when I have
to check out a fresh copy of the complete LyX repository?
--
V
Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 10:06:20AM +0100, José Matos wrote:
I'll do that and hope it works again.
It will, the problem you are seeing are due to the way the build
system sees (and handles) the dependencies, starting from a fresh
dir will take care of those problems. T
On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 10:06:20AM +0100, José Matos wrote:
> > I'll do that and hope it works again.
>
> It will, the problem you are seeing are due to the way the build
> system sees (and handles) the dependencies, starting from a fresh
> dir will take care of those problems. The other opt
On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 10:11:54AM +0200, Hartmut Haase wrote:
> Hi Michael.
> > we made a lot of file renamings in the last couple of days. This step
> > caused some trouble but it was inevitable for the long-term maintenance
> > of the LyX sources.
>
> I'm not criticizing WHAT you guys have don
On Wednesday 02 May 2007 09:11:54 Hartmut Haase wrote:
> Hi Michael.
Hi Hartmut, :-)
> I'm not criticizing WHAT you guys have done, but the WAY you did it. You
> should not do that in the repository until you are sure that it compiles
> again.
That was a concern during all the transition, an
Hi Michael.
> we made a lot of file renamings in the last couple of days. This step
> caused some trouble but it was inevitable for the long-term maintenance
> of the LyX sources.
I'm not criticizing WHAT you guys have done, but the WAY you did it. You
should not do that in the repository until
On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 10:03:49AM +0200, Hartmut Haase wrote:
> Hi there, since 7 days or more I can't compile anymore because someone
> checked things in without testing them. I don't know how you guys are
> are working but you violate at least one main rule of good s/w
> develepmont. This was a
Hartmut Haase schrieb:
Hi there,
since 7 days or more I can't compile anymore because someone checked things in
without testing them. I don't know how you guys are are working but you
violate at least one main rule of good s/w develepmont.
This was already the case when you switched to utf-8.
Hi there,
since 7 days or more I can't compile anymore because someone checked things in
without testing them. I don't know how you guys are are working but you
violate at least one main rule of good s/w develepmont.
This was already the case when you switched to utf-8.
A little more discipline w
23 matches
Mail list logo
