Re: lyx2lyx for InsetLayout Argument

2013-01-03 Thread Julien Rioux
On 03/01/2013 4:48 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: Julien Rioux wrote: I plan to add an optional Argument to the LilyPond flex inset. When I do this, it does not get reverted to ERT for 2.0. Do I understand correctly that I need to increase FORMAT and add lyx2lyx code each time we will do such a l

Re: lyx2lyx for InsetLayout Argument

2013-01-03 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Julien Rioux wrote: > I plan to add an optional Argument to the LilyPond flex inset. When I do > this, it does not get reverted to ERT for 2.0. Do I understand correctly > that I need to increase FORMAT and add lyx2lyx code each time we will do > such a layout change? Yes. However, there's lyx2

Re: lyx2lyx for InsetLayout Argument

2013-01-03 Thread Julien Rioux
On 03/01/2013 3:36 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: Julien Rioux wrote: In 2.1 if I define Arguments for my InsetLayout (great feature!) I note that lyx2lyx backport from 2.1 to 2.0 converts \begin_layout Argument 1 to \begin_layout Argument which isn't understood by 2.0 (maybe this conversion

Re: lyx2lyx for InsetLayout Argument

2013-01-03 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Julien Rioux wrote: > In 2.1 if I define Arguments for my InsetLayout (great feature!) I note > that lyx2lyx backport from 2.1 to 2.0 converts > > \begin_layout Argument 1 > > to > > \begin_layout Argument > > which isn't understood by 2.0 (maybe this conversion works for Style, > which has s

lyx2lyx for InsetLayout Argument

2013-01-02 Thread Julien Rioux
In 2.1 if I define Arguments for my InsetLayout (great feature!) I note that lyx2lyx backport from 2.1 to 2.0 converts \begin_layout Argument 1 to \begin_layout Argument which isn't understood by 2.0 (maybe this conversion works for Style, which has some OptArgument and ReqArgument support a