On Thu, Jul 19, 2001 at 06:29:16AM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
The standard 'spreadsheet' rules for never deleting cells in their
complexity may be elegant (and they are), but the flexibility to
join/split/pad rows just by inserting or deleting and \\ sequences
is one of the main things
(this is in an eqnarray, as an example).
It looks as C-Tab, C-Return and Backspace at the beginning of an cell
is what you are looking for.
Andre'
--
André Pönitz . [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Jul 19, 2001 at 04:13:41PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
(this is in an eqnarray, as an example).
It looks as C-Tab, C-Return and Backspace at the beginning of an cell
is what you are looking for.
That works, does it? (Don't have up to date version here). Well,
kudos, and apologies
On Thu, Jul 19, 2001 at 06:29:16AM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > The standard 'spreadsheet' rules for never deleting cells in their
> > complexity may be elegant (and they are), but the flexibility to
> > join/split/pad rows just by inserting or deleting & and \\ sequences
> > is one of the
> (this is in an eqnarray, as an example).
It looks as , and at the beginning of an cell
is what you are looking for.
Andre'
--
André Pönitz . [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Jul 19, 2001 at 04:13:41PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > (this is in an eqnarray, as an example).
>
> It looks as , and at the beginning of an cell
> is what you are looking for.
That works, does it? (Don't have up to date version here). Well,
kudos, and apologies for wasting your
On Tue, Jul 17, 2001 at 01:48:42AM +0200, Eran Tromer wrote:
Hi,
Andre Poenitz wrote:
- What should happen when pressing C-x (should I delete row 2 and clear
the part of row 1 right of the cursor and the part of row 3 left of the
anchor?)
- What should happen if I place the
The standard 'spreadsheet' rules for never deleting cells in their
complexity may be elegant (and they are), but the flexibility to
join/split/pad rows just by inserting or deleting and \\ sequences
is one of the main things that drives me out of LyX into xemacs/TeX.
It would be very nice
On Tue, Jul 17, 2001 at 01:48:42AM +0200, Eran Tromer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > - What should happen when pressing C-x (should I delete row 2 and clear
> > the part of row 1 right of the cursor and the part of row 3 left of the
> > anchor?)
> >
> > - What should happen if I
> The standard 'spreadsheet' rules for never deleting cells in their
> complexity may be elegant (and they are), but the flexibility to
> join/split/pad rows just by inserting or deleting & and \\ sequences
> is one of the main things that drives me out of LyX into xemacs/TeX.
> It would be very
In order to prepare multicell CutPaste: Suppose I have a 4x4 array, cursor
in the middle of cell (1,2), anchor in the middle of cell(3,1).
Am I missing something? In a matrix, current cvs lets me select only a
rectangular set of whole cells (which is right IMO).
Yes, you are looking at
Hi,
Andre Poenitz wrote:
Am I missing something? In a matrix, current cvs lets me select only a
rectangular set of whole cells (which is right IMO).
Yes, you are looking at the First Amendment (due to Dekel's intervention)
OK, that part is good.
C-x should certainly not delete rows
Yes, the behavior is completely different between rows and columns, so
we have examples of both options I proposed...
Not nice.
BTW, do you intend to make del do exactly what C-x does except for
changing the clipboard? Many applications handle these slightly
differently. MS Word 97, for
Andre Poenitz wrote:
BTW, do you intend to make del do exactly what C-x does except for
changing the clipboard? Many applications handle these slightly
differently. MS Word 97, for instance, just clears the cells upon del
but sometimes removes them upon C-x (with the above rules).
I
> > In order to prepare multicell Cut: Suppose I have a 4x4 array, cursor
> > in the middle of cell (1,2), anchor in the middle of cell(3,1).
>
> Am I missing something? In a matrix, current cvs lets me select only a
> rectangular set of whole cells (which is right IMO).
Yes, you are looking at
Hi,
Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > Am I missing something? In a matrix, current cvs lets me select only a
> > rectangular set of whole cells (which is right IMO).
>
> Yes, you are looking at the First Amendment (due to Dekel's intervention)
OK, that part is good.
> > C-x should certainly not
> Yes, the behavior is completely different between rows and columns, so
> we have examples of both options I proposed...
Not nice.
> BTW, do you intend to make do exactly what C-x does except for
> changing the clipboard? Many applications handle these slightly
> differently. MS Word 97, for
Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > BTW, do you intend to make do exactly what C-x does except for
> > changing the clipboard? Many applications handle these slightly
> > differently. MS Word 97, for instance, just clears the cells upon
> > but sometimes removes them upon C-x (with the above rules).
>
>
Guys, I need some advice:
This is a (somewhat longer) shot at multicell selection and old anchor
behaviour.
The anchor remains logically in the same position, so if one leaves an
inset with the cursor and comes back, the anchor is back at the position
where it was before the cursor left the
On Mon, Jul 16, 2001 at 01:31:52PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
Guys, I need some advice:
I'd like to get some feedback whether selection with cursor keys works as
one would expect and verify that cursor positioning using the mouse and
single cell CutPaste work properly.
In order to
Hi,
Andre Poenitz wrote:
This is a (somewhat longer) shot at multicell selection and old anchor
behaviour.
Selection within formula looks great now. Thanks!
I'd like to get some feedback whether selection with cursor keys works as
one would expect and verify that cursor positioning using
Guys, I need some advice:
This is a (somewhat longer) shot at multicell selection and "old" anchor
behaviour.
The anchor remains logically in the same position, so if one leaves an
inset with the cursor and comes back, the anchor is back at the position
where it was before the cursor left the
On Mon, Jul 16, 2001 at 01:31:52PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> Guys, I need some advice:
> I'd like to get some feedback whether selection with cursor keys works as
> one would expect and verify that cursor positioning using the mouse and
> single cell Cut work properly.
>
> In order to
Hi,
Andre Poenitz wrote:
> This is a (somewhat longer) shot at multicell selection and "old" anchor
> behaviour.
Selection within formula looks great now. Thanks!
> I'd like to get some feedback whether selection with cursor keys works as
> one would expect and verify that cursor positioning
24 matches
Mail list logo
