Re: oolatex

2008-10-14 Thread Uwe Stöhr
>> Is it OK to change this order so oolatex will be the first choice? > > This was changed intentionally because oolatex failed to work on some systems: > http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4604 > http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/23496 This was no real fix but introduced

Re: oolatex

2008-10-14 Thread Bo Peng
> Did you try the oolatex command or only the htlatex command that LyX uses? As far as I remember, I used the lyx export (htlatex I assume), and tex4ht command line. I got a .odf file but ooffice cannot open it. Bo

Re: oolatex

2008-10-14 Thread Joost Verburg
Bo Peng wrote: On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 1:54 PM, Joost Verburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: Joost Verburg wrote: Is it OK to change this order so oolatex will be the first choice? This was changed intentionally because oolatex failed to work on some systems:

Re: oolatex

2008-10-14 Thread Bo Peng
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 1:54 PM, Joost Verburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: >> >> Joost Verburg wrote: >>> >>> Is it OK to change this order so oolatex will be the first choice? >> >> This was changed intentionall

Re: oolatex

2008-10-14 Thread Joost Verburg
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: Joost Verburg wrote: Is it OK to change this order so oolatex will be the first choice? This was changed intentionally because oolatex failed to work on some systems: http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4604 http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/23496 Right. There

Re: oolatex

2008-10-14 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Joost Verburg wrote: > Is it OK to change this order so oolatex will be the first choice? This was changed intentionally because oolatex failed to work on some systems: http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4604 http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/23496 Jürgen

oolatex

2008-10-14 Thread Joost Verburg
Hi, In configure.py, the following code detects a LaTeX > OpenDocument converter: checkProg('a LaTeX -> Open Document converter', [ 'htlatex $$i \'xhtml,ooffice\' \'ooffice/! -cmozhtf\' \'-coo\' \'-cvalidate\'',

Re: oolatex File Format Issue

2007-05-17 Thread christian . ridderstrom
On Thu, 17 May 2007, Richard Heck wrote: OK. I'll take care of this later. Right now, I have to go to a baseball game Poor you ;-) /Christian José Matos wrote: On Thursday 17 May 2007 8:06:43 pm Abdelrazak Younes wrote: By the way, it's VERY unclear how to add a new file format

Re: oolatex File Format Issue

2007-05-17 Thread Richard Heck
OK. I'll take care of this later. Right now, I have to go to a baseball game José Matos wrote: > On Thursday 17 May 2007 8:06:43 pm Abdelrazak Younes wrote: > >>> By the way, it's VERY unclear how to add a new file format. It took me >>> quite a while to figure it out. Perhaps a tooltip on

Re: oolatex File Format Issue

2007-05-17 Thread José Matos
On Thursday 17 May 2007 8:06:43 pm Abdelrazak Younes wrote: > > By the way, it's VERY unclear how to add a new file format. It took me > > quite a while to figure it out. Perhaps a tooltip on the add button > > ("Enter a new GUI name") would do. But even then, it's very unintuitive. > > I agree.

Re: oolatex File Format Issue

2007-05-17 Thread Abdelrazak Younes
Richard Heck wrote: The default OpenOffice format is presently sxw, but oolatex now seems to produce odt by default. As a result, LyX thinks the conversion always fails, because it's looking for filename.sxw and can't find it. I think there are ways to make oolatex produce sxw (I&#

oolatex File Format Issue

2007-05-17 Thread Richard Heck
The default OpenOffice format is presently sxw, but oolatex now seems to produce odt by default. As a result, LyX thinks the conversion always fails, because it's looking for filename.sxw and can't find it. I think there are ways to make oolatex produce sxw (I'm trying to find o