On Wed, Oct 31, 2007 at 08:59:23AM +0100, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Andre Poenitz wrote:
>> I wonder how much resistance the (re- ;-)) introduction of a
>> 'real' lyx string class would meet.
>> Could be as simple as a struct wrapping a std::string
>> and delegating all of the work to std::string.
Andre Poenitz wrote:
I wonder how much resistance the (re- ;-)) introduction of a
'real' lyx string class would meet.
Could be as simple as a struct wrapping a std::string
and delegating all of the work to std::string.
The main advantages would be 'declarability' (i.e. class DocString;
would s
I wonder how much resistance the (re- ;-)) introduction of a
'real' lyx string class would meet.
Could be as simple as a struct wrapping a std::string
and delegating all of the work to std::string.
The main advantages would be 'declarability' (i.e. class DocString;
would suffice in lots of plac
