On Tuesday 01 February 2005 15:10, G. Milde wrote:
>
> These are the first to spring into my mind. There are more to expect. But
> also, they (and the existing ones) must be documented in order to be
> usable.
>
> My goal is to get for lyx a broad base of user-provided extensions in the
> way we th
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> "G" == G Milde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
| G> The keybinding is not really needed. If the code becomes more clear
| G> and concise by removing, please do so.
>
| It does not really change the code. It is just a matter of design of
| the l
> "G" == G Milde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
G> The keybinding is not really needed. If the code becomes more clear
G> and concise by removing, please do so.
It does not really change the code. It is just a matter of design of
the lyxsever protocol.
G> I thought to keep it for backwards comp
On 2.02.05, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "G" == G Milde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> G> Feature Request ===
>
> G> Could the lfun "server-notify" take an data argument, that is
> G> passed on to the lyxserver?
>
> Sure. And what about getting rid of the key binding too? Is
> "G" == G Milde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
G> Feature Request ===
G> Could the lfun "server-notify" take an data argument, that is
G> passed on to the lyxserver?
Sure. And what about getting rid of the key binding too? Is it really
useful to the client?
JMarc
On 27.01.05, Jose' Matos wrote:
> This is something that I wanted to do for quite some time. :-)
So did I. That's why I'm glad I did it finally.
> PS: In another movement (no pun John ;-) to help python scripting for lyx
> the lyx2lyx program has become only a interface to the new LyX.py modu
On Fri, Jan 28, 2005 at 09:01:04AM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > Super-glad to see Asger back into the fold. He can be a less hated me!!
> He's just got a thicker skin ;-) How the hell are you anyway?
Fine, insanity at work has mitigated into mere eccentricity. I might
even build a recent lyx s
John Levon wrote:
> Super-glad to see Asger back into the fold. He can be a less hated me!!
He's just got a thicker skin ;-) How the hell are you anyway?
--
Angus
On Thu, Jan 27, 2005 at 07:03:11PM +, Jose' Matos wrote:
> PS: In another movement (no pun John ;-) to help python scripting for lyx
Is this a test on whether I'm still listening? :)
Super-glad to see Asger back into the fold. He can be a less hated me!!
john
On Friday 21 January 2005 08:28, G. Milde wrote:
>
> Please find attached my work so far. If you copy lyx.py into the
> "pythonpath", pydoc will give you a nice view of the doc strings and
> setup
Hi GÃnter,
I would like to congratulate you for your work with the lyx server via
the
pyt
On 19.01.05, Angus Leeming wrote:
> G. Milde wrote:
> > Dear LyXers,
> >
> > IMHO, LyX clearly lacks a decent support for a scripting language. As
> > this topic is not new but discussion about which language to choose is
> > endless, I tried to set up a script interface via the lyxserver.
>
> De
11 matches
Mail list logo
