Re: Auto generation of lfun wiki page

2005-06-12 Thread Georg Baum
Am Samstag, 11. Juni 2005 19:23 schrieb Lars Gullik Bjønnes: Georg Baum [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | Why? Adding documentation, be it as comments or as strings in a new | (otherwise unused) member of the ev_item struct cannot introduce bugs or | influence the release of 1.4 in any other way.

Re: Auto generation of lfun wiki page

2005-06-12 Thread chr
On Sun, 12 Jun 2005, Georg Baum wrote: Except delaying it of course... Maybe. Of course we get delays if lfuns need to be discussed on the list, but that is independent from the documentation format. If we don't want that we should freeze the lfun documentation until 1.4.0 is released.

Re: Auto generation of lfun wiki page

2005-06-12 Thread Georg Baum
Am Samstag, 11. Juni 2005 19:23 schrieb Lars Gullik Bjønnes: > Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > | Why? Adding documentation, be it as comments or as strings in a new > | (otherwise unused) member of the ev_item struct cannot introduce bugs or > | influence the release of 1.4 in any

Re: Auto generation of lfun wiki page

2005-06-12 Thread chr
On Sun, 12 Jun 2005, Georg Baum wrote: > > Except delaying it of course... > > Maybe. Of course we get delays if lfuns need to be discussed on the list, > but that is independent from the documentation format. If we don't want > that we should freeze the lfun documentation until 1.4.0 is