On Monday 05 November 2001 13:13, John Levon wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 05, 2001 at 10:59:31AM -0500, George De Bruin wrote:
> > You chopped off a major part that I was responding to:
>
> oops ;)
I was just assuming that you mis-read what I was trying to get at... I do it
all the t
s, so if
>>> there is e.g. a boolean flag, it will be in both dialogs.
I wasn't just responding to the boolean flag portion, but also the
'intuitive' and 'responsibilities' portions as well. Hopefully you'll see
why in my response below...
> On
On Friday 02 November 2001 17:35, John Levon wrote:
> I would hope that the Qt2 dialogs are intuitive enough to not need
> documentation. Remeber the dialogs have the same responsibilities, so if
> there is e.g. a boolean flag, it will be in both dialogs.
John,
Not to start a debate (after all,
On Friday 02 November 2001 17:20, Mike Ressler wrote:
> > and I think it should be mentioned. If it's not in the Intro or
> > Tutorial, a sentence or two could be added to 1.2.2.2 in the UG. I think
> > that would be a good place for it since we are talking about the elements
> > / properties o
On Friday 02 November 2001 13:10, you wrote:
> > Query: do we mention anyhwere in the Intro or Tutorial that most dialogs
> > are not modal in LyX? That is, do we explain any place that most dialogs
> > can actually stay open while you actually work on your document. That's
>
> warning: this is
On Friday 02 November 2001 12:23, you wrote:
> > Anyway, I just started browsing quickly for the word "popup" and came
> > across section "1.2.2.2 Popups" -- should we just kill it? (Doesn't seem
> > necessary once we stop using the word...and it would look silly with the
> > word popup gone...:)
On Wednesday 31 October 2001 12:21, you wrote:
> Superb! Taking the UG off my shoulders, even if temporarily, is a huge
> help. There are things in Extended and Customization that I would rather
> worry about, so I really appreciate your jumping in.
Yeah, and this probably fits my user-level bet
On Tuesday 30 October 2001 15:01, you wrote:
> Hi George,
>
> On Sun, 28 Oct 2001, George De Bruin wrote:
> > Anyway, things seem to have settled down a bit now. So, after spedining
> > a couple of weeks catching up on the LyX User's list (there were over
> > 2
L.
// George
> regards
> Fred
>
> George De Bruin wrote:
> > The coming up section from the Open Source IT Newsletter:
> >
> > COMING UP:
> >
> > * .comment with Dennis Powell
> > * Linux From Scratch
> > * Word to the Wise: LyX: The Doc
The coming up section from the Open Source IT Newsletter:
COMING UP:
* .comment with Dennis Powell
* Linux From Scratch
* Word to the Wise: LyX: The Document Processor
-
I can't wait to read Brian's review!
// George
On Monday 16 July 2001 19:37, you wrote:
> I actually hope to have the "final" 1.1.6 docs completed and submitted
> this afternoon, tomorrow at the latest (if I can get my laptop's modem to
> cooperate). As you mention, this is mainly ensuring that all the menu
I'll look to getting the files ton
On Sunday 15 July 2001 23:13, Mike Ressler wrote:
> I will have some time to play with the docs this week. I intend to finish
> updating the 1.1.6 docs so that there aren't any inaccuracies, but I'd
Kewl.
> also like to forge ahead with the 1.2.0 docs and some of the rearranging
> we had discus
On Thursday 24 May 2001 20:12, you wrote:
> I don't have the energy to respond to each piece of the message. Basically,
> though, it's a neat idea but I really don't know if it'll work in practice.
I can say right now, I'm not *absolutely* certain of it at this point either.
Although, what I do s
On Tuesday 22 May 2001 12:03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
WARNING!!! WARNING!!! WARNING!!! WARNING!!! WARNING!!! WARNING!!!
What you are about to read is one *extremely* long message. (Over 200
lines!) I had a 'gestalt' after reading the other comments, and decided that
it was a concept that sh
On Monday 21 May 2001 23:05, John Weiss wrote:
> Oh, I listen. ;) Real life, however, intrudes from time to time, and
> I can go for weeks without cleaning up my lyx-box. But when I have
> something to say, I'm hard to shut up! :)
I know how that goes. Real life can be a major bummer som
On Monday 07 May 2001 13:42, you wrote:
> I've forwarded your message to the lyx-docs mailing list. If you haven't
> subscribed to it yet, you should. It's very low volume - completely in
> the noise compared to lyx-devel :-)
:) Actually, I intended this message to be posted in here.
> Yes, th
Moving this comment over here (if it hasn't already been moved here) since it
has been suggested this is a more appropriate location:
On Tuesday 01 May 2001 14:44, Laura Jackson wrote:
> Why couldn't LyX allow the user to type 2 spaces between sentences and 1
> space between words? It's frust
17 matches
Mail list logo
