On Sun, Jan 7, 2024 at 2:08 AM Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
>
> On 1/6/24 18:55, Udicoudco wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 4, 2024 at 8:42 PM Richard Kimberly Heck
> > wrote:
> >> It is not too late to do this for 2.4. We'd prefer not to have format
> >> changes at
On Thu, Jan 4, 2024 at 8:42 PM Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
> It is not too late to do this for 2.4. We'd prefer not to have format
> changes at this point, so it would depend upon how involved it is, i.e.,
> how complex the lyx2lyx code was. I can wait a day or two.
If it is not too late, I can
On Sat, Dec 30, 2023 at 11:26 AM Udicoudco wrote:
> Is there any significance for the accelerator as long as it is
> unique and contained in the UI string?
Let me rephrase. Are there more restrictions I should be aware of?
> Thanks,
> Udi
> > --
> > lyx-docs m
On Sat, Dec 30, 2023 at 11:14 AM Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
>
> Am Freitag, dem 29.12.2023 um 02:56 +0200 schrieb Udicoudco:
> > While working on the Hebrew .po file all of the
> > people involved agreed that the translation to
> > "Notation" should be changed.
&g
On Fri, Dec 29, 2023 at 2:56 AM Udicoudco wrote:
> The problem is that if we'll change only the .po
> file, the output won't be the same as the GUI, but
> if we'll change layouttranslations it can potentially
> affect the output of existing documents.
Sorry, I meant to as
While working on the Hebrew .po file all of the
people involved agreed that the translation to
"Notation" should be changed.
The problem is that if we'll change only the .po
file, the output won't be the same as the GUI, but
if we'll change layouttranslations it can potentially
affect the output
