On Sat, 23 Jun 2001, John Levon wrote:
Until GUI support for this is provided, we need to document this work-around
somewhere (adding given line to ~/.lyx/preferences or so).
Where should this go ?
In Customization somewhere, unless it will be GUIized in time for 1.2.0.
If it is very
On Sat, 23 Jun 2001, John Levon wrote:
> Until GUI support for this is provided, we need to document this work-around
> somewhere (adding given line to ~/.lyx/preferences or so).
>
> Where should this go ?
In Customization somewhere, unless it will be GUIized in time for 1.2.0.
If it is very
On Wed, 13 Jun 2001, Mads Flensted-Jensen wrote:
It says:
You can find them in the Edit-Version Control submenu
But the commands are found in:
File-Version Control
I'll fix this. Yet another 1.1.5 - 1.1.6 change ...
Mike
--
Mike Ressler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OK, I'm lame: I don't have my own
On 13 Jun 2001, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
I deleted the lyxdoc-1_1_6-updates tag. Should I do something else?
Is the lyxdoc-1_1_6 tag still needed? That could be removed, too, I think.
Mike
--
Mike Ressler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OK, I'm lame: I don't have my own website ...
On Wed, 13 Jun 2001, Mads Flensted-Jensen wrote:
> It says:
> "You can find them in the Edit->Version Control submenu"
> But the commands are found in:
> File->Version Control
I'll fix this. Yet another 1.1.5 -> 1.1.6 change ...
Mike
--
Mike Ressler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OK, I'm lame: I don't
On 13 Jun 2001, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> I deleted the lyxdoc-1_1_6-updates tag. Should I do something else?
Is the lyxdoc-1_1_6 tag still needed? That could be removed, too, I think.
Mike
--
Mike Ressler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OK, I'm lame: I don't have my own website ...
On Sat, 2 Jun 2001, John Levon wrote:
Are the doc team still insistent on this term ? It seems both unfamiliar
to users, and a bad description (the dialogs do /not/ pop up).
IIRC, this was chosen as a compromise - we wanted to avoid the developer
jargon (dialog box was deemed jargon) and use
On Sat, 2 Jun 2001, John Levon wrote:
I've also added a changelog (cvs add ChangeLog) as I think this
would be useful.
Good.
One problem - these changes are partly lyx 1.2.0 specific. Do we need
branches in CVS or what ?
I had created a 1.1.5 branch in the past, since 1.1.6 was so
On Fri, 8 Jun 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 2 Jun 2001, John Levon wrote:
I've also added a changelog (cvs add ChangeLog) as I think this
would be useful.
John, did you actually commit this? I don't see your ChangeLog or the
modifications to Intro.lyx.
Mike
--
Mike Ressler
On Sat, 2 Jun 2001, John Levon wrote:
> Are the doc team still insistent on this term ? It seems both unfamiliar
> to users, and a bad description (the dialogs do /not/ pop up).
IIRC, this was chosen as a compromise - we wanted to avoid the developer
jargon ("dialog box" was deemed jargon) and
On Sat, 2 Jun 2001, John Levon wrote:
> I've also added a changelog (cvs add ChangeLog) as I think this
> would be useful.
Good.
> One problem - these changes are partly lyx 1.2.0 specific. Do we need
> branches in CVS or what ?
I had created a 1.1.5 branch in the past, since 1.1.6 was so
On Fri, 8 Jun 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Sat, 2 Jun 2001, John Levon wrote:
> > I've also added a changelog (cvs add ChangeLog) as I think this
> > would be useful.
John, did you actually commit this? I don't see your ChangeLog or the
modifications to Intro.lyx.
Mike
--
Mike Ressler
Hello George,
I've forwarded your message to the lyx-docs mailing list. If you haven't
subscribed to it yet, you should. It's very low volume - completely in
the noise compared to lyx-devel :-)
On Fri, 4 May 2001, George De Bruin wrote:
However, I was thinking while we aren't to the point of
Hello George,
I've forwarded your message to the lyx-docs mailing list. If you haven't
subscribed to it yet, you should. It's very low volume - completely in
the noise compared to lyx-devel :-)
On Fri, 4 May 2001, George De Bruin wrote:
> However, I was thinking while we aren't to the point of
On Sat, 3 Mar 2001, Herbert Voss wrote:
Georg Mayr wrote:
Should I rather go to the users-mailing list for the remaining question?
this is the list for the documentation of lyx and it has very low
volume. therefore you should always write to
lyx-users@...
I semi-disagree. For getting
On Sat, 3 Mar 2001, Herbert Voss wrote:
> Georg Mayr wrote:
> > Should I rather go to the users-mailing list for the remaining question?
>
> this is the list for the documentation of lyx and it has very low
> volume. therefore you should always write to
>
> lyx-users@...
I semi-disagree. For
On Sun, 11 Feb 2001, Chanop Silpa-Anan wrote:
There are a few customization that needs to be done ATM e.g. font, keymap,
and Thai Latex. Font and Keymap are pretty ordinary stuff but I still would
like to put them together in one document if it fits LyX-documentation
project. Thai Latex
On Sun, 11 Feb 2001, Chanop Silpa-Anan wrote:
> There are a few customization that needs to be done ATM e.g. font, keymap,
> and Thai Latex. Font and Keymap are pretty ordinary stuff but I still would
> like to put them together in one document if it fits LyX-documentation
> project. Thai Latex
18 matches
Mail list logo
