then playing Grammar Police.
Thx, this was a useful reply, I have learned a lot.
Mate
On Mon, Oct 25, 1999 at 09:33:52AM -0500, Mate Wierdl wrote:
>
>"ExtendedFeatures" is the abbreviated name, a mnemonic. Maybe if all
>of you would READ the manual instead of just the title...
>
> John, we did read the manual. Our problem is that `extended features'
> is not correct
"ExtendedFeatures" is the abbreviated name, a mnemonic. Maybe if all
of you would READ the manual instead of just the title...
John, we did read the manual. Our problem is that `extended features'
is not correct grammatically. You are not extending existing features
of lyx; in the ma
On Thu, Oct 14, 1999 at 11:47:36AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Bruce" == Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Bruce> I am reading the Extended Features manual, and it is very good.
> Bruce> However, I would like to suggest a different name for this
> Bruce> manual. I thin
Stop it StopIt *StopIt* *STOP*IT* **STOP** **IT**!! ENOUGH WITH
THE MANUAL NAMES, ALREADY!
"Extended" is for extending and customizing LyX?! WHAT THE H*** ARE
YOU PEOPLE THINKING?! WHY WOULD WE HAVE A "Customization" IF THAT
WERE TRUE?!
Okay... I'm trying to calm down... I'm tryin
On Fri, Oct 15, 1999 at 10:19:47AM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >
> >I think of Extended as Extending, or a manual about
> >> Bruce> extending the features of LyX.
> >
> > Agreed. `Extended Features' does not seem grammatically correct: are
"ExtendedFeatures" is the abbreviated name,
On Thu, Oct 14, 1999 at 02:44:37PM -0500, Mate Wierdl wrote:
> "Additional Features"
Nixed even before Extended Features.
> "Extra Features"
Also nixed
> "More Features"
Don't like it.
--
John Weiss
[Charset iso-8859-1 unsupported, filtering to ASCII...]
> On Thu, 14 Oct 1999 11:51:07 -0700 (PDT), [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> >If you can come up with a better name, I think we'd all be happy to hear
> >it. "Extended" was just the best we could come up with at the time.
>
> "Special F."
Ye
>
>I think of Extended as Extending, or a manual about
>> Bruce> extending the features of LyX.
>
> Agreed. `Extended Features' does not seem grammatically correct: are
> the features extended? What features of LyX are extended?---the
> revtex feature? Was the revtex feature already t
On Thu, 14 Oct 1999 11:51:07 -0700 (PDT), [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
>If you can come up with a better name, I think we'd all be happy to hear
>it. "Extended" was just the best we could come up with at the time.
"Special F."
AH
I think of Extended as Extending, or a manual about
> Bruce> extending the features of LyX.
Agreed. `Extended Features' does not seem grammatically correct: are
the features extended? What features of LyX are extended?---the
revtex feature? Was the revtex feature already there?
"Additi
> > "Bruce" == Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Bruce> I am reading the Extended Features manual, and it is very good.
> Bruce> However, I would like to suggest a different name for this
> Bruce> manual. I think of Extended as Extending, or a manual about
> Bruce> extending the feat
> "Bruce" == Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Bruce> I am reading the Extended Features manual, and it is very good.
Bruce> However, I would like to suggest a different name for this
Bruce> manual. I think of Extended as Extending, or a manual about
Bruce> extending the features of L
13 matches
Mail list logo
