Re: LyX takes much longer time to compile than at command line

2001-03-09 Thread Andre Poenitz
Does it take 45 seconds _every time_ you use 'Show/DVI' from LyX, or does this happen just once? If I select the DVI view a second time without making changes to the document i can reduce the time to 13 seconds until xdvi pops up. This probably mean that 32 seconds have been used for the

Re: LyX takes much longer time to compile than at command line

2001-03-09 Thread Arthaber Holger
just a quick summary of the times measured: One LaTeX-Run + XDVI-startup Three LaTeX-Runs + XDVI-startup LxY13s45s Shell script 2s5s Holger

Poll --- Compiler usage

2001-03-09 Thread Andre Poenitz
Dear all, as you probably know LyX can currently be compiled with g++ 2.8.1 and later as well as with a few proprietary compilers. g++ 2.8.1 does not support some features that some developers would like to use. Currently there is a discussion on lyx-devel on whether it is sensible to drop

Re: What's wrong with the new Tables!?

2001-03-09 Thread Allan Rae
Your description sounds like the new table reader doesn't allow for '\r' like the old file reader did. Allan. (ARRae)

Re: What's wrong with the new Tables!?

2001-03-09 Thread Claus Hentschel
Your description sounds like the new table reader doesn't allow for '\r' like the old file reader did. Allan. (ARRae) You mean it's due to the different newline behaviour in DOS/WIN32 and UNUX/Linux, right? I do have changed the file (using vi on Win32) from fileformat=dos to

Re: What's wrong with the new Tables!?

2001-03-09 Thread Jean-Pierre.Chretien
From: "Claus Hentschel" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "Allan Rae" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: "\(LyX-Users\)" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: What's wrong with the new Tables!? Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2001 14:21:05 +0100 Your description sounds like the new table reader doesn't allow for '\r' like the old file

Re: LyX takes much longer time to compile than at command line

2001-03-09 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
"Andre" == Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Does it take 45 seconds _every time_ you use 'Show/DVI' from LyX, or does this happen just once? If I select the DVI view a second time without making changes to the document i can reduce the time to 13 seconds until xdvi pops up.

Re: LyX takes much longer time to compile than at command line

2001-03-09 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | "Andre" == Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | | Does it take 45 seconds _every time_ you use 'Show/DVI' from LyX, | or does this happen just once? | | If I select the DVI view a second time without making changes to | the document

Re: What's wrong with the new Tables!?

2001-03-09 Thread Allan Rae
On Fri, 9 Mar 2001, Claus Hentschel wrote: Your description sounds like the new table reader doesn't allow for '\r' like the old file reader did. Allan. (ARRae) You mean it's due to the different newline behaviour in DOS/WIN32 and UNUX/Linux, right? I do have changed the file

table within endnotes

2001-03-09 Thread Ronald Florence
I need to insert a table at the beginning of the endnotes of a book. What I want to end up with is something like Abbreviations AAE Archives des Affaires trangeres, Quai d'Orsay, Paris APT Turquie: Affaires Diverses FO Foreign Office Archives, PRO,

LaTeX ? - Eqn. in Section Heading

2001-03-09 Thread Al Freed
Hi, Lars Gullik Bjnnes requested that I ask the LaTeX gurus in this users group if they could solve this bug (see attached bug-adf.lyx file) which produces the following error message: > TeX capacity exceeded > input stack_size = 300 I edited texmf.cnf increasing it several time all the way up

Re: LyX takes much longer time to compile than at command line

2001-03-09 Thread Dekel Tsur
On Fri, Mar 09, 2001 at 08:49:00AM +0100, Arthaber Holger wrote: Hi folks! Since I added some scanned pictures to my LyX-document the compilation takes very long. (I am not sure but I think that this effect started appearing after this) For example if I use the 'Show/DVI' from LyX it

Re: LyX takes much longer time to compile than at command line

2001-03-09 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Dekel Tsur [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | The problem is a bad version of the sstream library on your machine (or on | the machine where the binary was compiled). | If you compiled LyX yourself, you might try installing a pre-compiled | binary, or try to recompile using the --with-included-string

Re: LaTeX ? - Eqn. in Section Heading

2001-03-09 Thread Herbert Voss
Al Freed wrote: Lars Gullik Bjnnes requested that I ask the LaTeX gurus in this users group if they could solve this bug (see attached bug-adf.lyx file) which produces the following error message: TeX capacity exceeded input stack_size = 300 in 99% it's not an error which

table within endnotes

2001-03-09 Thread Ronald Florence
Bad form to answer my own query, but after enough fiddling I discovered that the secret to getting complex ERT commands like a table to work inside an \addtoendnotes{} for endnotes.sty is a liberal use of \protect. My little table required 3: \mainmatter \addtoendnotes{

Re: LaTeX ? - Eqn. in Section Heading

2001-03-09 Thread Herbert Voss
Al Freed wrote: In the section heading of this short file is an equation that calls a couple of macros defined in the LaTeX preamble. maybe that you need the formula in the section-title and standard-style is not possible. for this reason look at attached file. Herbert -- [EMAIL

Re: LyX takes much longer time to compile than at command line

2001-03-09 Thread Andre Poenitz
Andre', could you have a quick look at it? You are much more knowledgeable in STL than I am. The code looks correct, but it slurps in the whole file while handling an item at a time should suffice. On low memory machines this might be a problem... This is basically a tradeoff between speed

Re: LyX takes much longer time to compile than at command line

2001-03-09 Thread Arthaber Holger
Andre', could you have a quick look at it? You are much more knowledgeable in STL than I am. The code looks correct, but it slurps in the whole file while handling an item at a time should suffice. On low memory machines this might be a problem... It does not look like I have a memory

Re: Including files into a masterdocument

2001-03-09 Thread Dekel Tsur
On Thu, Mar 08, 2001 at 03:43:15PM +0100, Marco Bosch wrote: Hello, I'm writing my thesis using different lyx-files for different chapters. In lyx 1.1.5 it works OK. However, in lyx 1.1.6fix1 I get the message ERROR: Cannot handle include file `~/file.lyx' which has textclass `book'

Re: LyX takes much longer time to compile than at command line

2001-03-09 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Arthaber Holger [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | just for additional information: the document I am working has about 25 | drawings in combined ps/latex-format and about 5 scans as a postscript | file. | The document itself is smaller than 200kB. What's the sum with all the graphics? Lgb

Re: LyX takes much longer time to compile than at command line

2001-03-09 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | Andre', could you have a quick look at it? You are much more | knowledgeable in STL than I am. | | The code looks correct, but it slurps in the whole file while handling an | item at a time should suffice. On low memory machines this might be a |

Re: LyX takes much longer time to compile than at command line

2001-03-09 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | I feel 45 s is clearly inacceptable so _I_ would not mind to replace the | lyxsum with a "good ol' C implementation" which should be reasonably fast | in all cases. It would not do much harm to our "new style C++ code" since | it is restricted to a

Re: LyX takes much longer time to compile than at command line

2001-03-09 Thread Arthaber Holger
| just for additional information: the document I am working has about 25 | drawings in combined ps/latex-format and about 5 scans as a postscript | file. | The document itself is smaller than 200kB. What's the sum with all the graphics? document: 174kB ps/latex: 254kB ps-scans:

Re: LyX takes much longer time to compile than at command line

2001-03-09 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Arthaber Holger [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | | just for additional information: the document I am working | has about 25 | | drawings in combined ps/latex-format and about 5 scans as a | postscript | | file. | | The document itself is smaller than 200kB. | | What's the sum with all the

Intermediate poll results

2001-03-09 Thread Andre Poenitz
There have been 27 responses so far (not bad, given that the poll has been running just a few hours...) Currently I count two proprietary compilers, that I can't classify (yet), one 2.7.*, two 2.8.*, four egcs*, the remaining 2.95 and above or precompiled binaries from various sources. From the

Re: LaTeX ? - Eqn. in Section Heading

2001-03-09 Thread Dekel Tsur
On Fri, Mar 09, 2001 at 09:50:26AM -0500, Al Freed wrote: In the section heading of this short file is an equation that calls a couple of macros defined in the LaTeX preamble. Any help in resolving this is greatly appreciated. Put \protect before \overset in the definition of \Jaumann,

Re: What's wrong with the new Tables!?

2001-03-09 Thread Herbert Voss
Claus Hentschel wrote: I am using LyX since Lyx 1.0.4 on both Linux and Windows system. Up to Lyx 1.1.6 (fix1) I always was able to use LyX's source files on both systems regardless where they have been written! all worked well with 1.2.0cvs and linux 2.2.18 with suse. exactly the same as

Re: What's wrong with the new Tables!?

2001-03-09 Thread Kayvan A. Sylvan
On Fri, Mar 09, 2001 at 10:34:42AM +0100, Claus Hentschel wrote: I am using LyX since Lyx 1.0.4 on both Linux and Windows system. Up to Lyx 1.1.6 (fix1) I always was able to use LyX's source files on both systems regardless where they have been written! Your table2.lyx file shows up perfectly

Re: What's wrong with the new Tables!?

2001-03-09 Thread Claus Hentschel
Allan (Allan Rae [EMAIL PROTECTED]) had mentioned the solution: The new tabular code can't handle CR (\r)! Although I have tried to remove them within Win32 (maybe I had made anything wrong;-)) using vim, another test in Linux makes all things as expected! Conclusion: Removing those

i.e.\ serached

2001-03-09 Thread Rainer Dorsch
Hello, in LaTeX I often wrote i.e.\ something to avoid a big space after the dot. Is there a lyx equivalent or do I have to switch in latex mode? Thanks. Rainer.

Changing labels

2001-03-09 Thread Alexandre Gonçalves Jacarandá
Hi guys, How can I change label figure for graphics, because sometimes we've graphics instead of figures. Thanks, Alexandre Gonalves Jacarand -- clarkagjcris

Re: LyX takes much longer time to compile than at command line

2001-03-09 Thread Andre Poenitz
Does it take 45 seconds _every time_ you use 'Show/DVI' from LyX, or does this happen just once? If I select the DVI view a second time without making changes to the document i can reduce the time to 13 seconds until xdvi pops up. This probably mean that 32 seconds have been used for the

Re: LyX takes much longer time to compile than at command line

2001-03-09 Thread Arthaber Holger
just a quick summary of the times measured: One LaTeX-Run + XDVI-startup Three LaTeX-Runs + XDVI-startup LxY13s45s Shell script 2s5s Holger

Poll --- Compiler usage

2001-03-09 Thread Andre Poenitz
Dear all, as you probably know LyX can currently be compiled with g++ 2.8.1 and later as well as with a few proprietary compilers. g++ 2.8.1 does not support some features that some developers would like to use. Currently there is a discussion on lyx-devel on whether it is sensible to drop

Re: What's wrong with the new Tables!?

2001-03-09 Thread Allan Rae
Your description sounds like the new table reader doesn't allow for '\r' like the old file reader did. Allan. (ARRae)

Re: What's wrong with the new Tables!?

2001-03-09 Thread Claus Hentschel
Your description sounds like the new table reader doesn't allow for '\r' like the old file reader did. Allan. (ARRae) You mean it's due to the different newline behaviour in DOS/WIN32 and UNUX/Linux, right? I do have changed the file (using vi on Win32) from fileformat=dos to

Re: What's wrong with the new Tables!?

2001-03-09 Thread Jean-Pierre.Chretien
From: "Claus Hentschel" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "Allan Rae" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: "\(LyX-Users\)" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: What's wrong with the new Tables!? Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2001 14:21:05 +0100 Your description sounds like the new table reader doesn't allow for '\r' like the old file

Re: LyX takes much longer time to compile than at command line

2001-03-09 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
"Andre" == Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Does it take 45 seconds _every time_ you use 'Show/DVI' from LyX, or does this happen just once? If I select the DVI view a second time without making changes to the document i can reduce the time to 13 seconds until xdvi pops up.

Re: LyX takes much longer time to compile than at command line

2001-03-09 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | "Andre" == Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | | Does it take 45 seconds _every time_ you use 'Show/DVI' from LyX, | or does this happen just once? | | If I select the DVI view a second time without making changes to | the document

Re: What's wrong with the new Tables!?

2001-03-09 Thread Allan Rae
On Fri, 9 Mar 2001, Claus Hentschel wrote: Your description sounds like the new table reader doesn't allow for '\r' like the old file reader did. Allan. (ARRae) You mean it's due to the different newline behaviour in DOS/WIN32 and UNUX/Linux, right? I do have changed the file

table within endnotes

2001-03-09 Thread Ronald Florence
I need to insert a table at the beginning of the endnotes of a book. What I want to end up with is something like Abbreviations AAE Archives des Affaires trangeres, Quai d'Orsay, Paris APT Turquie: Affaires Diverses FO Foreign Office Archives, PRO,

LaTeX ? - Eqn. in Section Heading

2001-03-09 Thread Al Freed
Hi, Lars Gullik Bjnnes requested that I ask the LaTeX gurus in this users group if they could solve this bug (see attached bug-adf.lyx file) which produces the following error message: > TeX capacity exceeded > input stack_size = 300 I edited texmf.cnf increasing it several time all the way up

Re: LyX takes much longer time to compile than at command line

2001-03-09 Thread Dekel Tsur
On Fri, Mar 09, 2001 at 08:49:00AM +0100, Arthaber Holger wrote: Hi folks! Since I added some scanned pictures to my LyX-document the compilation takes very long. (I am not sure but I think that this effect started appearing after this) For example if I use the 'Show/DVI' from LyX it

Re: LyX takes much longer time to compile than at command line

2001-03-09 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Dekel Tsur [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | The problem is a bad version of the sstream library on your machine (or on | the machine where the binary was compiled). | If you compiled LyX yourself, you might try installing a pre-compiled | binary, or try to recompile using the --with-included-string

Re: LaTeX ? - Eqn. in Section Heading

2001-03-09 Thread Herbert Voss
Al Freed wrote: Lars Gullik Bjnnes requested that I ask the LaTeX gurus in this users group if they could solve this bug (see attached bug-adf.lyx file) which produces the following error message: TeX capacity exceeded input stack_size = 300 in 99% it's not an error which

table within endnotes

2001-03-09 Thread Ronald Florence
Bad form to answer my own query, but after enough fiddling I discovered that the secret to getting complex ERT commands like a table to work inside an \addtoendnotes{} for endnotes.sty is a liberal use of \protect. My little table required 3: \mainmatter \addtoendnotes{

Re: LaTeX ? - Eqn. in Section Heading

2001-03-09 Thread Herbert Voss
Al Freed wrote: In the section heading of this short file is an equation that calls a couple of macros defined in the LaTeX preamble. maybe that you need the formula in the section-title and standard-style is not possible. for this reason look at attached file. Herbert -- [EMAIL

Re: LyX takes much longer time to compile than at command line

2001-03-09 Thread Andre Poenitz
Andre', could you have a quick look at it? You are much more knowledgeable in STL than I am. The code looks correct, but it slurps in the whole file while handling an item at a time should suffice. On low memory machines this might be a problem... This is basically a tradeoff between speed

Re: LyX takes much longer time to compile than at command line

2001-03-09 Thread Arthaber Holger
Andre', could you have a quick look at it? You are much more knowledgeable in STL than I am. The code looks correct, but it slurps in the whole file while handling an item at a time should suffice. On low memory machines this might be a problem... It does not look like I have a memory

Re: Including files into a masterdocument

2001-03-09 Thread Dekel Tsur
On Thu, Mar 08, 2001 at 03:43:15PM +0100, Marco Bosch wrote: Hello, I'm writing my thesis using different lyx-files for different chapters. In lyx 1.1.5 it works OK. However, in lyx 1.1.6fix1 I get the message ERROR: Cannot handle include file `~/file.lyx' which has textclass `book'

Re: LyX takes much longer time to compile than at command line

2001-03-09 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Arthaber Holger [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | just for additional information: the document I am working has about 25 | drawings in combined ps/latex-format and about 5 scans as a postscript | file. | The document itself is smaller than 200kB. What's the sum with all the graphics? Lgb

Re: LyX takes much longer time to compile than at command line

2001-03-09 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | Andre', could you have a quick look at it? You are much more | knowledgeable in STL than I am. | | The code looks correct, but it slurps in the whole file while handling an | item at a time should suffice. On low memory machines this might be a |

Re: LyX takes much longer time to compile than at command line

2001-03-09 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | I feel 45 s is clearly inacceptable so _I_ would not mind to replace the | lyxsum with a "good ol' C implementation" which should be reasonably fast | in all cases. It would not do much harm to our "new style C++ code" since | it is restricted to a

Re: LyX takes much longer time to compile than at command line

2001-03-09 Thread Arthaber Holger
| just for additional information: the document I am working has about 25 | drawings in combined ps/latex-format and about 5 scans as a postscript | file. | The document itself is smaller than 200kB. What's the sum with all the graphics? document: 174kB ps/latex: 254kB ps-scans:

Re: LyX takes much longer time to compile than at command line

2001-03-09 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Arthaber Holger [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | | just for additional information: the document I am working | has about 25 | | drawings in combined ps/latex-format and about 5 scans as a | postscript | | file. | | The document itself is smaller than 200kB. | | What's the sum with all the

Intermediate poll results

2001-03-09 Thread Andre Poenitz
There have been 27 responses so far (not bad, given that the poll has been running just a few hours...) Currently I count two proprietary compilers, that I can't classify (yet), one 2.7.*, two 2.8.*, four egcs*, the remaining 2.95 and above or precompiled binaries from various sources. From the

Re: LaTeX ? - Eqn. in Section Heading

2001-03-09 Thread Dekel Tsur
On Fri, Mar 09, 2001 at 09:50:26AM -0500, Al Freed wrote: In the section heading of this short file is an equation that calls a couple of macros defined in the LaTeX preamble. Any help in resolving this is greatly appreciated. Put \protect before \overset in the definition of \Jaumann,

Re: What's wrong with the new Tables!?

2001-03-09 Thread Herbert Voss
Claus Hentschel wrote: I am using LyX since Lyx 1.0.4 on both Linux and Windows system. Up to Lyx 1.1.6 (fix1) I always was able to use LyX's source files on both systems regardless where they have been written! all worked well with 1.2.0cvs and linux 2.2.18 with suse. exactly the same as

Re: What's wrong with the new Tables!?

2001-03-09 Thread Kayvan A. Sylvan
On Fri, Mar 09, 2001 at 10:34:42AM +0100, Claus Hentschel wrote: I am using LyX since Lyx 1.0.4 on both Linux and Windows system. Up to Lyx 1.1.6 (fix1) I always was able to use LyX's source files on both systems regardless where they have been written! Your table2.lyx file shows up perfectly

Re: What's wrong with the new Tables!?

2001-03-09 Thread Claus Hentschel
Allan (Allan Rae [EMAIL PROTECTED]) had mentioned the solution: The new tabular code can't handle CR (\r)! Although I have tried to remove them within Win32 (maybe I had made anything wrong;-)) using vim, another test in Linux makes all things as expected! Conclusion: Removing those

i.e.\ serached

2001-03-09 Thread Rainer Dorsch
Hello, in LaTeX I often wrote i.e.\ something to avoid a big space after the dot. Is there a lyx equivalent or do I have to switch in latex mode? Thanks. Rainer.

Changing labels

2001-03-09 Thread Alexandre Gonçalves Jacarandá
Hi guys, How can I change label figure for graphics, because sometimes we've graphics instead of figures. Thanks, Alexandre Gonalves Jacarand -- clarkagjcris

Re: LyX takes much longer time to compile than at command line

2001-03-09 Thread Andre Poenitz
> > Does it take 45 seconds _every time_ you use 'Show/DVI' from LyX, > > or does this happen just once? > > If I select the DVI view a second time without making changes to the > document i can reduce the time to 13 seconds until xdvi pops up. This probably mean that 32 seconds have been used

Re: LyX takes much longer time to compile than at command line

2001-03-09 Thread Arthaber Holger
just a quick summary of the times measured: One LaTeX-Run + XDVI-startup Three LaTeX-Runs + XDVI-startup LxY13s45s Shell script <2s<5s Holger

Poll --- Compiler usage

2001-03-09 Thread Andre Poenitz
Dear all, as you probably know LyX can currently be compiled with g++ 2.8.1 and later as well as with a few proprietary compilers. g++ 2.8.1 does not support some features that some developers would like to use. Currently there is a discussion on lyx-devel on whether it is sensible to drop

Re: What's wrong with the new Tables!?

2001-03-09 Thread Allan Rae
Your description sounds like the new table reader doesn't allow for '\r' like the old file reader did. Allan. (ARRae)

Re: What's wrong with the new Tables!?

2001-03-09 Thread Claus Hentschel
> Your description sounds like the new table reader doesn't allow for '\r' > like the old file reader did. > > Allan. (ARRae) You mean it's due to the different newline behaviour in DOS/WIN32 and UNUX/Linux, right? I do have changed the file (using vi on Win32) from fileformat=dos to

Re: What's wrong with the new Tables!?

2001-03-09 Thread Jean-Pierre.Chretien
>>From: "Claus Hentschel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>To: "Allan Rae" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>Cc: "\(LyX-Users\)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>Subject: Re: What's wrong with the new Tables!? >>Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2001 14:21:05 +0100 >> >>> Your description sounds like the new table reader doesn't allow for '\r'

Re: LyX takes much longer time to compile than at command line

2001-03-09 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> > Does it take 45 seconds _every time_ you use 'Show/DVI' from LyX, >> > or does this happen just once? >> >> If I select the DVI view a second time without making changes to >> the document i can reduce the time to 13 seconds until

Re: LyX takes much longer time to compile than at command line

2001-03-09 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | | >> > Does it take 45 seconds _every time_ you use 'Show/DVI' from LyX, | >> > or does this happen just once? | >> | >> If I select the DVI view a second time without making changes

Re: What's wrong with the new Tables!?

2001-03-09 Thread Allan Rae
On Fri, 9 Mar 2001, Claus Hentschel wrote: > > Your description sounds like the new table reader doesn't allow for '\r' > > like the old file reader did. > > > > Allan. (ARRae) > > > You mean it's due to the different newline behaviour in DOS/WIN32 and > UNUX/Linux, right? > > I do have changed

table within endnotes

2001-03-09 Thread Ronald Florence
I need to insert a table at the beginning of the endnotes of a book. What I want to end up with is something like Abbreviations AAE Archives des Affaires Étrangeres, Quai d'Orsay, Paris APT Turquie: Affaires Diverses FO Foreign Office Archives, PRO,

LaTeX ? - Eqn. in Section Heading

2001-03-09 Thread Al Freed
Hi, Lars Gullik Bjønnes requested that I ask the LaTeX gurus in this users group  if they could solve this bug  (see attached bug-adf.lyx file) which produces the following error message: >    TeX capacity exceeded >    input stack_size = 300 I edited texmf.cnf increasing it several time all the

Re: LyX takes much longer time to compile than at command line

2001-03-09 Thread Dekel Tsur
On Fri, Mar 09, 2001 at 08:49:00AM +0100, Arthaber Holger wrote: > Hi folks! > > Since I added some scanned pictures to my LyX-document the > compilation takes very long. (I am not sure but I think that this > effect started appearing after this) > > For example if I use the 'Show/DVI' from LyX

Re: LyX takes much longer time to compile than at command line

2001-03-09 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | The problem is a bad version of the sstream library on your machine (or on | the machine where the binary was compiled). | If you compiled LyX yourself, you might try installing a pre-compiled | binary, or try to recompile using the --with-included-string

Re: LaTeX ? - Eqn. in Section Heading

2001-03-09 Thread Herbert Voss
Al Freed wrote: > > Lars Gullik Bjønnes requested that I ask the LaTeX gurus in this users > group if they could > solve this bug (see attached bug-adf.lyx file) which produces the > following error message: > >TeX capacity exceeded > >input stack_size = 300 in 99% it's not an error

table within endnotes

2001-03-09 Thread Ronald Florence
Bad form to answer my own query, but after enough fiddling I discovered that the secret to getting complex ERT commands like a table to work inside an \addtoendnotes{} for endnotes.sty is a liberal use of \protect. My little table required 3: \mainmatter \addtoendnotes{

Re: LaTeX ? - Eqn. in Section Heading

2001-03-09 Thread Herbert Voss
Al Freed wrote: > In the section heading of this short file is an equation that calls a > couple of macros defined > in the LaTeX preamble. maybe that you need the formula in the section-title and standard-style is not possible. for this reason look at attached file. Herbert -- [EMAIL

Re: LyX takes much longer time to compile than at command line

2001-03-09 Thread Andre Poenitz
> Andre', could you have a quick look at it? You are much more > knowledgeable in STL than I am. The code looks correct, but it slurps in the whole file while handling an item at a time should suffice. On low memory machines this might be a problem... This is basically a tradeoff between speed

Re: LyX takes much longer time to compile than at command line

2001-03-09 Thread Arthaber Holger
> > Andre', could you have a quick look at it? You are much more > > knowledgeable in STL than I am. > > The code looks correct, but it slurps in the whole file while > handling an > item at a time should suffice. On low memory machines this might be a > problem... It does not look like I have

Re: Including files into a masterdocument

2001-03-09 Thread Dekel Tsur
On Thu, Mar 08, 2001 at 03:43:15PM +0100, Marco Bosch wrote: > Hello, > > I'm writing my thesis using different lyx-files for different chapters. > In lyx 1.1.5 it works OK. However, in lyx 1.1.6fix1 I get the message > > ERROR: Cannot handle include file `~/file.lyx' which has textclass >

Re: LyX takes much longer time to compile than at command line

2001-03-09 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Arthaber Holger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | just for additional information: the document I am working has about 25 | drawings in combined ps/latex-format and about 5 scans as a postscript | file. | The document itself is smaller than 200kB. What's the sum with all the graphics? Lgb

Re: LyX takes much longer time to compile than at command line

2001-03-09 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > Andre', could you have a quick look at it? You are much more | > knowledgeable in STL than I am. | | The code looks correct, but it slurps in the whole file while handling an | item at a time should suffice. On low memory machines this might be a |

Re: LyX takes much longer time to compile than at command line

2001-03-09 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | I feel 45 s is clearly inacceptable so _I_ would not mind to replace the | lyxsum with a "good ol' C implementation" which should be reasonably fast | in all cases. It would not do much harm to our "new style C++ code" since | it is restricted to a

Re: LyX takes much longer time to compile than at command line

2001-03-09 Thread Arthaber Holger
> | just for additional information: the document I am working > has about 25 > | drawings in combined ps/latex-format and about 5 scans as a > postscript > | file. > | The document itself is smaller than 200kB. > > What's the sum with all the graphics? document: 174kB ps/latex: 254kB

Re: LyX takes much longer time to compile than at command line

2001-03-09 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Arthaber Holger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > | just for additional information: the document I am working | > has about 25 | > | drawings in combined ps/latex-format and about 5 scans as a | > postscript | > | file. | > | The document itself is smaller than 200kB. | > | > What's the sum

Intermediate poll results

2001-03-09 Thread Andre Poenitz
There have been 27 responses so far (not bad, given that the poll has been running just a few hours...) Currently I count two proprietary compilers, that I can't classify (yet), one 2.7.*, two 2.8.*, four egcs*, the remaining 2.95 and above or precompiled binaries from various sources. >From

Re: LaTeX ? - Eqn. in Section Heading

2001-03-09 Thread Dekel Tsur
On Fri, Mar 09, 2001 at 09:50:26AM -0500, Al Freed wrote: > In the section heading of this short file is an equation that calls a > couple of macros defined > in the LaTeX preamble. > > Any help in resolving this is greatly appreciated. Put \protect before \overset in the definition of

Re: What's wrong with the new Tables!?

2001-03-09 Thread Herbert Voss
Claus Hentschel wrote: > > I am using LyX since Lyx 1.0.4 on both Linux and Windows system. Up to Lyx > 1.1.6 (fix1) I always was able to use LyX's source files on both systems > regardless where they have been written! all worked well with 1.2.0cvs and linux 2.2.18 with suse. exactly the same

Re: What's wrong with the new Tables!?

2001-03-09 Thread Kayvan A. Sylvan
On Fri, Mar 09, 2001 at 10:34:42AM +0100, Claus Hentschel wrote: > I am using LyX since Lyx 1.0.4 on both Linux and Windows system. Up to Lyx > 1.1.6 (fix1) I always was able to use LyX's source files on both systems > regardless where they have been written! Your table2.lyx file shows up

Re: What's wrong with the new Tables!?

2001-03-09 Thread Claus Hentschel
Allan (Allan Rae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) had mentioned the solution: The new tabular code can't handle CR (\r)! Although I have tried to remove them within Win32 (maybe I had made anything wrong;-)) using vim, another test in Linux makes all things as expected! Conclusion: Removing those

i.e.\ serached

2001-03-09 Thread Rainer Dorsch
Hello, in LaTeX I often wrote i.e.\ something to avoid a big space after the dot. Is there a lyx equivalent or do I have to switch in latex mode? Thanks. Rainer.

Changing labels

2001-03-09 Thread Alexandre Gonçalves Jacarandá
Hi guys, How can I change label figure for graphics, because sometimes we've graphics instead of figures. Thanks, Alexandre Gonçalves Jacarandá -- clarkagjcris