[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Here's an alternative take on this problem. Why not use 'chktex' or a
> similar approach. For those who don't know 'chktex', it's a parser that
> detects common errors and mistakes, and it works with lyx if you have
> it installed. (Under Edit->CheckTeX I think).
Not in
Am Mittwoch, 25. Mai 2005 11:13 schrieb Juergen Spitzmueller:
> Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
> > For better visibility, in a talk on Lyx I would like to have a script
> > size larger than 12. In Document style > Format > script-and-size, 12 is
> > the largest for selection. Where and how do I change t
Hola a todos,
I need up page number 3 milimetros up.
It is because my printer driver (for Canon BJC 2000)
for Suse Linux reduce printable area and page number
not appears in print output (appears in dvi output).
I have selected koma-script book.
Thanks in advance.
Marcelo Acuña
___
Yes, you can. The "listings" package is a good solution as for me ...
For example :
\usepackage{listings}
...
\lstinputlisting[language=Java, alsolanguage=SQL, label={mylabel},
caption={...}]{myfile.java}
...
To insert a hyperref (with the 'hyperref' package) :
\ref{mylabel}
-Message d'
Hello list,
I want to insert source code ( Java, Sql) into the document.
Can I insert it formatted (indent and/or colored) like in an IDE?
thanks,
Christian
On Tue, 24 May 2005 05:33:36 -0700 (PDT)
Ruiming Zhang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> I am trying to use lyx to write a paper, but I have
> met a problem with nesting the enumerate environment
> within a theorem. I want to get out of the enumerate
> environment without getting out of the theor
Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
> For better visibility, in a talk on Lyx I would like to have a script size
> larger than 12. In Document style > Format > script-and-size, 12 is the
> largest for selection. Where and how do I change this? I guess, in the
> preamble. Since I use the dvi output parallel
On Wed, 25 May 2005, G. Milde wrote:
> On 24.05.05, Sven Schreiber wrote:
> > Martin A. Hansen wrote:
> >
> > > but if lyx already removes double-spaces, when why not remove space
> > > before , . : ; etc.?
> >
> > Because going from one to two spaces is a matter of degree and --given
> > that t
