On Thu, 26 Dec 2013 23:48:41 + (UTC)
justin wrote:
> Richard Talley gmail.com> writes:
>
> >
> >
> >
> > A completely empty folder? Or a folder containing a folder named
> > 'Contents'?
> >
> >
>
>
> Thanks for coming back so quickly! Completely empty. Nothing in it
> whatsoever. Tha
I'm not quite ready to upgrade to Mavericks, but this technique is so
fundamental to how OS X has worked since the very beginning I can't see
Apple removing it. My search also came up empty on your issue.
Try this instead:
Open a Finder window, pull down the 'Go' menu and choose the 'Go to
Folder
>
> That's a stumper - an empty app would have nothing to run. If LyX actually
runs, then the app can't possibly be empty.
>
>
>
> In OS X, the Finder presents an app as a single file, but it's actually an
application bundle that contains the executable and other resources (in the
case of LyX
That's a stumper - an empty app would have nothing to run. If LyX actually
runs, then the app can't possibly be empty.
In OS X, the Finder presents an app as a single file, but it's actually an
application bundle that contains the executable and other resources (in the
case of LyX the other resour
Richard Talley gmail.com> writes:
>
>
>
> A completely empty folder? Or a folder containing a folder named 'Contents'?
>
>
Thanks for coming back so quickly! Completely empty. Nothing in it
whatsoever. That's what it shows using that method anyway. I would really
love to find it, so I can
A completely empty folder? Or a folder containing a folder named 'Contents'?
On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 4:29 PM, justin wrote:
>
> > On the Mac installation, they get buried inside of the app package.
> >
> > Find LyX.app in your applications folder
> > Right click on it and select "show package
> On the Mac installation, they get buried inside of the app package.
>
> Find LyX.app in your applications folder
> Right click on it and select "show package contents"The go to Contents ->
Resources -> examples
> It might be a good idea to copy the folder to somewhere more convenient
outside of
Stephan,
I was able to make changes to the corresponding code for the English option in
g-brief.cls without any problem. (For some reason LyX wouldn’t acknowledge the
“german” option for the class even if I changed my language default to German
so I wasn’t able to test exactly your desired chan
col...@gmx.net wrote:
> Ich benutze gerne das g-brief Template, auch wenn es etwas antiquiert
> ist. Nun habe ich möchte ich gern eine angepasste Version des Templates
> erstellen, so dass im Brieffuß nun statt "Kto." -> "IBAN" und statt
> "BLZ" -> "BIC" erscheint (auf Grund der leidigen SEPA Umste
