On Wed, 25 Apr 2001 12:28:57 -0400 wrote Matej Cepl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I do not want quarrel with you about such a triviality, but what
> I mean is, that by embedding Python you would allow us,
> non-programmers, to help you a send you beautiful :-) programmes
> for everything WE need (no
On Wed 25 duben 2001 12:06 Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
> Matej Cepl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> | YES! Than I would be able to get my beloved
> | transpose-characters function, which nobody cares to
> | implement in LyX.
>
> You only have to provide a patch...
>
> (same as you would have to do wi
On úterý 24 duben 2001 21:51 you wrote:
> > 3.TeXmacs comes with the Guile/Scheme extension
> > language.
>
> Hmmm... we'll almost certainly end up with Python. Asger has
> already shown about 3 years ago that Python can be embedded in
> a couple of lines. The problem is more a matter o
Matej Cepl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| YES! Than I would be able to get my beloved transpose-characters
| function, which nobody cares to implement in LyX.
You only have to provide a patch...
(same as you would have to do with python, unless you don't want to
share of course.)
--
L
>>From: Matej Cepl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>To: "LyX disc. list" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>Subject: Embedded Python (Was: Re: [OT] TeXmacs?)
>>Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2001 10:12:56 -0400
>>
>>On úterý 24 duben 2001 21:51 you wrote:
>&
Matej Cepl writes:
YES! Than I would be able to get my beloved transpose-characters
function, which nobody cares to implement in LyX.
I wouldn't know how to implement it, but I'll second the request. In
addition to a transpose-characters (C-t) function, LyX could use a
transpose-words
- Original Message -
From: "Matej Cepl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "LyX disc. list" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2001 9:12 AM
Subject: Embedded Python (Was: Re: [OT] TeXmacs?)
> On úterý 24 duben 2001 21:51 you wrote:
> > >
I think that LyX could look very good ported to MacOSX. The port should
not be very difficult. It is a matter of rewriting the GUI in Cocoa. Is
somebody working on this?
On Wed, 25 Apr 2001, Jacobo Myesrton wrote:
> I think that LyX could look very good ported to MacOSX. The port should
> not be very difficult. It is a matter of rewriting the GUI in Cocoa.
"...not be very difficult" ;-)
Complexity of porting medium-to-low, learning curve of Cocoa unknown.
>
> > I'll give them that one for the moment (although Maple LaTeX import
> > apparently works) and we've had at least two different interested groups
> > start some work on this but they seem to have disappeared.
>
> Who cares about proprietary Maple ;)
Well, I care, since that's what I am using.
Stefano Ghirlanda wrote:
>
> Matej Cepl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Wereb't there some attempts to rewrite NeXT environment for X as
> > a free soft (GNUStep)? As I remember, they tried to create some
> > kind of Display PostScript based on the Ghostscript (there are
> > some remaints in t
> So, how do you do it? ;-)
Works only with latest CVS and the patch I send yesterday to lyx-devel
and only for a very limited set of operations.
Note that this combination is not to be used for serious work. Latest
recommended version for serious work involving math is CVS from early
February,
> You would get no ERT at all in LyX if reLyX was able to convert
> {1}\over{\sqrt{3}} as \frac{1}{sqrt{3}}: this is more difficult...
> Is it a weakness of reLyX (i.e. no implementation of math TeX constructs
> in mathed ?).
That's not a job for reLyX, but for the mathed parser...
Andre'
--
A
On Tue, 24 Apr 2001 17:19:05 +0200 (CEST) wrote Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > 4.You can use TeXmacs as an interface to computer algebra systems.
> > [...]
> > I was thinking about developing 4 for some time but a number of
> > circumstances have halted the project. Please mail
>>Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2001 10:07:45 +0300 (EEST)
>>From: Tuukka Toivonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>To: Allan Rae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>cc: LyX Users <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>Subject: Re: [OT] TeXmacs? (or Maxima & LyX)
>>
>>On Wed, 25 A
On Wed, 25 Apr 2001, Allan Rae wrote:
> I'll give them that one for the moment (although Maple LaTeX import
> apparently works) and we've had at least two different interested groups
> start some work on this but they seem to have disappeared.
Who cares about proprietary Maple ;)
What would be n
Hi,
My experience was similar. texmacs was so slow as to being
unusable. Perhaps this is not a problem for Quake III machines :)
Juha
On Tue, 24 Apr 2001, Niklas Werner wrote:
> Hi All!
>
> Sorry to be a bit offtopic. (This is not meant to start a new WYSIWYM
> vs. WYSIWYG debate)
> Has an
On 24 Apr 2001, Stefano Ghirlanda wrote:
> Question 5. What are the differences between TeXmacs and LyX?
>
>Answer. TeXmacs is a more ambitious project. Some of its major
>advantages are the following:
>
> 1.TeXmacs is fully WYSIWYG.
With all the problems that entails.
Matej Cepl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Wereb't there some attempts to rewrite NeXT environment for X as
> a free soft (GNUStep)? As I remember, they tried to create some
> kind of Display PostScript based on the Ghostscript (there are
> some remaints in the ghostscript distribution until now
On úterý 24 duben 2001 5:27 you wrote:
> I guess it's the latter, there is a Type1 Server Module in
> XFree4. there's something about Window::KeyPress() that loads
> some ps_device. starting up creates all the needed fonts, thus
> takes a very long time... not reading in the terminal makes
> you
> 4.You can use TeXmacs as an interface to computer algebra systems.
> [...]
> I was thinking about developing 4 for some time but a number of
> circumstances have halted the project. Please mail me if you have some
> valuable insight into a nice way of doing it.
Well, do you mean some
Niklas Werner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Has anybody ever tried TeXmacs? (www.texmacs.org)
I have tried an earlier version. The display looks good, but I found
some major problems (for me, they are intentional features). TeXmacs
is *not* a frontend to TeX/LaTeX, it *never* runs these. You can
> Looks very impressive. Everything antialiased. And did I see correctly
> from the screenshots, that it supports directly pari (something kind of
> what i suggested for lyx and maxima)...?
yupp, that's right
> But if it actually runs tex after each keypress, then it really has to
> be slow. Or
On Tue, 24 Apr 2001, Niklas Werner wrote:
> Has anybody ever tried TeXmacs? (www.texmacs.org)
> seems to be the attempt to bring Latex to WYSIWYG, though it doesn't
> really work for me ;-(. it's incredibly slow, because it tries to display
Looks very impressive. Everything antialiased. And di
Hi All!
Sorry to be a bit offtopic. (This is not meant to start a new WYSIWYM
vs. WYSIWYG debate)
Has anybody ever tried TeXmacs? (www.texmacs.org)
seems to be the attempt to bring Latex to WYSIWYG, though it doesn't
really work for me ;-(. it's incredibly slow, because it tries to display
the
25 matches
Mail list logo
