Class is (for the time being as I know you advised otherwise) book
(mwbk).
I have noted to experiment with memoir :-)
On Tue, 2005-06-14 at 12:38 +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Bruce == Bruce Ernest Weller [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Bruce For neatness' sake I note that the scrip below
Class is (for the time being as I know you advised otherwise) book
(mwbk).
I have noted to experiment with memoir :-)
On Tue, 2005-06-14 at 12:38 +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Bruce == Bruce Ernest Weller [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Bruce For neatness' sake I note that the scrip below
Class is (for the time being as I know you advised otherwise) .
I have noted to experiment with memoir :-)
On Tue, 2005-06-14 at 12:38 +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Bruce" == Bruce Ernest Weller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Bruce> For neatness' sake I note that the scrip below
For neatness' sake I note that the scrip below (now corrected in line
with J-Marc's direction) over-writes the Article XXI over (under?)
text of the section text in the table of contents.
Not a problem.
I rather like the look of my solution which was to put a hard return
before the section
Bruce == Bruce Ernest Weller [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Bruce For neatness' sake I note that the scrip below (now corrected
Bruce in line with J-Marc's direction) over-writes the Article XXI
Bruce over (under?) text of the section text in the table of
Bruce contents.
I guess it is a limitation
For neatness' sake I note that the scrip below (now corrected in line
with J-Marc's direction) over-writes the Article XXI over (under?)
text of the section text in the table of contents.
Not a problem.
I rather like the look of my solution which was to put a hard return
before the section
Bruce == Bruce Ernest Weller [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Bruce For neatness' sake I note that the scrip below (now corrected
Bruce in line with J-Marc's direction) over-writes the Article XXI
Bruce over (under?) text of the section text in the table of
Bruce contents.
I guess it is a limitation
For neatness' sake I note that the scrip below (now corrected in line
with J-Marc's direction) over-writes the "Article XXI" over (under?)
text of the text in the table of contents.
Not a problem.
I rather like the look of my solution which was to put a hard return
before the text. Crude,
> "Bruce" == Bruce Ernest Weller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Bruce> For neatness' sake I note that the scrip below (now corrected
Bruce> in line with J-Marc's direction) over-writes the "Article XXI"
Bruce> over (under?) text of the text in the table of
Bruce> contents.
I guess it is a
Ahh right! There are none so blind as they who will not look
(carefully)!
Corrected and it works beautifully
Changed the Article to ARTICLE (for the same period flavour as the
original) as a little test and learned what that bit of the code does. A
step forward.
I have memoir and will update
Ahh right! There are none so blind as they who will not look
(carefully)!
Corrected and it works beautifully
Changed the Article to ARTICLE (for the same period flavour as the
original) as a little test and learned what that bit of the code does. A
step forward.
I have memoir and will update
Ahh right! There are none so blind as they who will not look
(carefully)!
Corrected and it works beautifully
Changed the Article to ARTICLE (for the same period flavour as the
original) as a little test and learned what that bit of the code does. A
step forward.
I have memoir and will update
Bruce == Bruce Ernest Weller [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Bruce J-Marc Happy to carry out the correspondence in the list but I
Bruce suspect that I am guilty of not providing enough
Bruce information.Not really sure of the etiquette and reluctant to
Bruce lead the list readers on a wild goose
Bruce == Bruce Ernest Weller [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Bruce J-Marc Happy to carry out the correspondence in the list but I
Bruce suspect that I am guilty of not providing enough
Bruce information.Not really sure of the etiquette and reluctant to
Bruce lead the list readers on a wild goose
> "Bruce" == Bruce Ernest Weller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Bruce> J-Marc Happy to carry out the correspondence in the list but I
Bruce> suspect that I am guilty of not providing enough
Bruce> information.Not really sure of the etiquette and reluctant to
Bruce> lead the list readers on a
15 matches
Mail list logo
