The new features are a great improvement and make my everyday life certainly
easier, so I definetly like that and would like to thank you for it. I also
appreciate the way issues raised by users are handled, which James has pointed
out already.
As I am not part of the development it seems to be
Hi José,
in general, I very much enjoyed the overall energy that went into the release.
Especially our new developers (and I note that many of them come from the Win
world) contributed fresh ideas and made LyX 1.6 a very worthy release. I really
enjoy working with this release.
Also, from what
On Wed, 10 Dec 2008, peerlynt wrote:
for it. I also appreciate the way issues raised by users are handled,
which James has pointed out already.
As I am not part of the development it seems to be somewhat difficult to
evaluate what could be improved. Well its just impression I got, which might
On Wed, 10 Dec 2008, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Especially our new developers (and I note that many of them come from
the Win world) contributed fresh ideas and made LyX 1.6 a very worthy
release.
I suspect we owe thanks to the people behind the Windows installers (Uwe
and Joost) for this.
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
I think that we should reconsider the meaning of the term release candidate
:-) In my opinion, a release candidate is something that is really intended to be
released as a final version, if no really crucial problem occurs while testing it.
I think this is a worry
The new features are a great improvement and make my everyday life certainly
easier, so I definetly like that and would like to thank you for it. I also
appreciate the way issues raised by users are handled, which James has pointed
out already.
As I am not part of the development it seems to be
Hi José,
in general, I very much enjoyed the overall energy that went into the release.
Especially our new developers (and I note that many of them come from the Win
world) contributed fresh ideas and made LyX 1.6 a very worthy release. I really
enjoy working with this release.
Also, from what
On Wed, 10 Dec 2008, peerlynt wrote:
for it. I also appreciate the way issues raised by users are handled,
which James has pointed out already.
As I am not part of the development it seems to be somewhat difficult to
evaluate what could be improved. Well its just impression I got, which might
On Wed, 10 Dec 2008, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Especially our new developers (and I note that many of them come from
the Win world) contributed fresh ideas and made LyX 1.6 a very worthy
release.
I suspect we owe thanks to the people behind the Windows installers (Uwe
and Joost) for this.
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
I think that we should reconsider the meaning of the term release candidate
:-) In my opinion, a release candidate is something that is really intended to be
released as a final version, if no really crucial problem occurs while testing it.
I think this is a worry
The new features are a great improvement and make my everyday life certainly
easier, so I definetly like that and would like to thank you for it. I also
appreciate the way issues raised by users are handled, which James has pointed
out already.
As I am not part of the development it seems to be
Hi José,
in general, I very much enjoyed the overall energy that went into the release.
Especially our new developers (and I note that many of them come from the Win
world) contributed fresh ideas and made LyX 1.6 a very worthy release. I really
enjoy working with this release.
Also, from what
On Wed, 10 Dec 2008, peerlynt wrote:
for it. I also appreciate the way issues raised by users are handled,
which James has pointed out already.
As I am not part of the development it seems to be somewhat difficult to
evaluate what could be improved. Well its just impression I got, which might
On Wed, 10 Dec 2008, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Especially our new developers (and I note that many of them come from
the Win world) contributed fresh ideas and made LyX 1.6 a very worthy
release.
I suspect we owe thanks to the people behind the Windows installers (Uwe
and Joost) for this.
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
I think that we should reconsider the meaning of the term "release candidate"
:-) In my opinion, a release candidate is something that is really intended to be
released as a final version, if no really crucial problem occurs while testing it.
I think this is a
Hi all,
in order to improve the development process of LyX I would to call for
feedback regarding the development of 1.6.0
I have decide to wait a bit before asking for a public evaluation avoid
the
transient state that occurs after the release. We are now in a better way to
LIKED:
- Developers were very responsive to issues raised by users (primarily
in the user group), and most issues were fixed in the next release
candidate.
- Releases were made close to the scheduled date. This encourages
users to be involved in the process by knowing when to check back
Hi all,
in order to improve the development process of LyX I would to call for
feedback regarding the development of 1.6.0
I have decide to wait a bit before asking for a public evaluation avoid
the
transient state that occurs after the release. We are now in a better way to
LIKED:
- Developers were very responsive to issues raised by users (primarily
in the user group), and most issues were fixed in the next release
candidate.
- Releases were made close to the scheduled date. This encourages
users to be involved in the process by knowing when to check back
Hi all,
in order to improve the development process of LyX I would to call for
feedback regarding the development of 1.6.0
I have decide to wait a bit before asking for a public evaluation avoid
the
transient state that occurs after the release. We are now in a better way to
LIKED:
- Developers were very responsive to issues raised by users (primarily
in the user group), and most issues were fixed in the next release
candidate.
- Releases were made close to the scheduled date. This encourages
users to be involved in the process by knowing when to check back
21 matches
Mail list logo
