Re: Frames around equations - finally

2003-08-14 Thread Kai Johannes Keller
Hello Herbert, > ok, I see. I misunderstood what you meant. But if you want > all equations framed, then it is much more easier. See > example file. > > The solution with ggbox works, but it may cause problems > with the font sizes, because you have inline mode inside > displaymode. Anyway, it i

Re: Frames around equations - finally

2003-08-14 Thread Kai Johannes Keller
Am Sam, 2003-08-09 um 09.55 schrieb Herbert Voß: > there is no difference in using fbox directly > > \equationbox{\int\limits_2^{\infty}\frac{1}{x}dx=0.25} > \fbox{$\displaystyle\int\limits_2^{\infty}\frac{1}{x}dx=0.25$} > > You always use inline math, which is very easy to frame > and so there

Re: Frames around equations - finally

2003-08-14 Thread Herbert Voss
Kai Johannes Keller schrieb: > So, do you think it's possible to frame some of the formulas and display the others > without frame - maybe some new environment: "framed equation" - do you have any > experiences in sucher things? -because I don't. attached a LyX layout file addons.inc. Insert it

Frames around equations - finally

2003-08-14 Thread Kai Johannes Keller
Hello everybody, for everybody who wants some frame DIRECTLY AROUND THE EQUATION, and not over the whole width of the page, AND NUMBERING OUTSIDE THE FRAME, this may be interesting: I've modified some solution (by Phillip Helbig) from the Googlegroups-mail-archieve, which draws the frame in an LaT

Re: Frames around equations - finally

2003-08-14 Thread Amir Seginer
Hello, I'm probably missing something, but what is wrong with the \boxed{} command in AMS? In the QT version you even see the box in LyX. Amir. Kai Johannes Keller wrote: Hello everybody, for everybody who wants some frame DIRECTLY AROUND THE EQUATION, and not over the whole width of the page,

Re: Frames around equations - finally

2003-08-14 Thread Herbert Voss
Kai Johannes Keller schrieb: Am Mon, 2003-08-11 um 23.53 schrieb Amir Seginer: Hello, I'm probably missing something, but what is wrong with the \boxed{} command in AMS? In the QT version you even see the box in LyX. Amir. That's not true, all the time we (especially you) spent with defining

Re: Frames around equations - finally

2003-08-14 Thread Herbert Voß
Kai Johannes Keller schrieb: for everybody who wants some frame DIRECTLY AROUND THE EQUATION, and not over the whole width of the page, AND NUMBERING OUTSIDE THE FRAME, this may be interesting: I've modified some solution (by Phillip Helbig) from the Googlegroups-mail-archieve, which draws the fram

Re: Frames around equations - finally

2003-08-14 Thread Kai Johannes Keller
Hello Herbert, that's great! You must be some magician ;o) Thank you very much. -Kai- PS: Have you given this "addon" to the developers-list, too, or are you one of the developers yourself? Am Sam, 2003-08-09 um 20.00 schrieb Herbert Voss: > Kai Johannes Keller

Re: Frames around equations - finally

2003-08-10 Thread Herbert Voss
Kai Johannes Keller schrieb: I haven't recognized that in the former solution the formula is displayed in inline- mode, thats not good! That's why I like you solution better, but if I dont want to frame every equation I#ve got a new problem, see? no, should be easy to have a switch \frameOn and f

Re: Frames around equations - finally

2003-08-10 Thread Herbert Voß
Kai Johannes Keller schrieb: for everybody who wants some frame DIRECTLY AROUND THE EQUATION, and not over the whole width of the page, AND NUMBERING OUTSIDE THE FRAME, this may be interesting: I've modified some solution (by Phillip Helbig) from the Googlegroups-mail-archieve, which draws the fram