Rich Shepard rshepard at appl-ecosys.com writes:
I do the above, save the document, and look at the dvi preview. It's not
rotated but in the upper right corner of the page and off both margins. But
... A-ha! It is rotated in the pdflatex output.
It occurred to me that sometimes the
On Sat, 14 Jan 2012, Paul A. Rubin wrote:
I've never dug into the reason for this,
Paul,
Neither have I because I need it so infrequently.
... but I think that some packages (and rotating may be one of them, if
that's the correct name) only work with PDF output.
Looks reasonable.
I
Rich Shepard rshepard at appl-ecosys.com writes:
I do the above, save the document, and look at the dvi preview. It's not
rotated but in the upper right corner of the page and off both margins. But
... A-ha! It is rotated in the pdflatex output.
It occurred to me that sometimes the
On Sat, 14 Jan 2012, Paul A. Rubin wrote:
I've never dug into the reason for this,
Paul,
Neither have I because I need it so infrequently.
... but I think that some packages (and rotating may be one of them, if
that's the correct name) only work with PDF output.
Looks reasonable.
I
Rich Shepard appl-ecosys.com> writes:
>I do the above, save the document, and look at the dvi preview. It's not
> rotated but in the upper right corner of the page and off both margins. But
> ... A-ha! It is rotated in the pdflatex output.
>
>It occurred to me that sometimes the dvi
On Sat, 14 Jan 2012, Paul A. Rubin wrote:
I've never dug into the reason for this,
Paul,
Neither have I because I need it so infrequently.
... but I think that some packages (and "rotating" may be one of them, if
that's the correct name) only work with PDF output.
Looks reasonable.
On Fri, 13 Jan 2012, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
Er, ... according to the detailed Math manual, Only inline formulas are
allowed inside tables. So, that's that.
Nonsense. Simply set the column width or put the formula in a minipage.
Perhaps this should be directed to whomever maintains
On Fri, 13 Jan 2012, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
Er, ... according to the detailed Math manual, Only inline formulas are
allowed inside tables. So, that's that.
Nonsense. Simply set the column width or put the formula in a minipage.
Perhaps this should be directed to whomever maintains
On Fri, 13 Jan 2012, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
Er, ... according to the detailed Math manual, "Only inline formulas are
allowed inside tables." So, that's that.
Nonsense. Simply set the column width or put the formula in a minipage.
Perhaps this should be directed to whomever maintains
I've looked in TLC2 without finding the solution to splitting an inline
equation when it's in a table column. I have two long equations in a
2-column table and they make the table much too wide; it extends past the
text width on the right.
Making the font a smaller size is one solution, but
On Thu, 12 Jan 2012, Rich Shepard wrote:
Is there a way to do this?
I found the rotating package, but I'm having difficulty using it. Perhaps
I need to modify the LaTeX output manually?
Rich
On Thu, 12 Jan 2012, Rich Shepard wrote:
I've looked in TLC2 without finding the solution to splitting an inline
equation when it's in a table column. I have two long equations in a
2-column table and they make the table much too wide; it extends past the
text width on the right.
I've
On Thu, 12 Jan 2012, Rich Shepard wrote:
table within \being{sidewaystable} and \end{sidewaystable}, or
\being{landscape} and \end{landscape}.
See? It's that sort of a day. Those should be \begin{... and not
\being{...
Sigh,
Rich
Not sure to which of these I should respond. :-) In approximately chronological
order:
1. IMHO inline equations should never be long. If it's long enough to give you
margin/column width headaches, I'd do it display mode, which gives you access to
multiline equation formats.
2. Rotating a table
On Thu, 12 Jan 2012, Paul A. Rubin wrote:
Not sure to which of these I should respond. :-) In approximately chronological
order:
1. IMHO inline equations should never be long. If it's long enough to give you
margin/column width headaches, I'd do it display mode, which gives you access to
On Thu, 12 Jan 2012, Paul A. Rubin wrote:
1. IMHO inline equations should never be long. If it's long enough to give
you margin/column width headaches, I'd do it display mode, which gives you
access to multiline equation formats.
Paul,
Er, ... according to the detailed Math manual, Only
Rich Shepard writes:
Er, ... according to the detailed Math manual, Only inline formulas are
allowed inside tables. So, that's that.
Nonsense. Simply set the column width or put the formula in a minipage.
--
Enrico
I've looked in TLC2 without finding the solution to splitting an inline
equation when it's in a table column. I have two long equations in a
2-column table and they make the table much too wide; it extends past the
text width on the right.
Making the font a smaller size is one solution, but
On Thu, 12 Jan 2012, Rich Shepard wrote:
Is there a way to do this?
I found the rotating package, but I'm having difficulty using it. Perhaps
I need to modify the LaTeX output manually?
Rich
On Thu, 12 Jan 2012, Rich Shepard wrote:
I've looked in TLC2 without finding the solution to splitting an inline
equation when it's in a table column. I have two long equations in a
2-column table and they make the table much too wide; it extends past the
text width on the right.
I've
On Thu, 12 Jan 2012, Rich Shepard wrote:
table within \being{sidewaystable} and \end{sidewaystable}, or
\being{landscape} and \end{landscape}.
See? It's that sort of a day. Those should be \begin{... and not
\being{...
Sigh,
Rich
Not sure to which of these I should respond. :-) In approximately chronological
order:
1. IMHO inline equations should never be long. If it's long enough to give you
margin/column width headaches, I'd do it display mode, which gives you access to
multiline equation formats.
2. Rotating a table
On Thu, 12 Jan 2012, Paul A. Rubin wrote:
Not sure to which of these I should respond. :-) In approximately chronological
order:
1. IMHO inline equations should never be long. If it's long enough to give you
margin/column width headaches, I'd do it display mode, which gives you access to
On Thu, 12 Jan 2012, Paul A. Rubin wrote:
1. IMHO inline equations should never be long. If it's long enough to give
you margin/column width headaches, I'd do it display mode, which gives you
access to multiline equation formats.
Paul,
Er, ... according to the detailed Math manual, Only
Rich Shepard writes:
Er, ... according to the detailed Math manual, Only inline formulas are
allowed inside tables. So, that's that.
Nonsense. Simply set the column width or put the formula in a minipage.
--
Enrico
I've looked in TLC2 without finding the solution to splitting an inline
equation when it's in a table column. I have two long equations in a
2-column table and they make the table much too wide; it extends past the
text width on the right.
Making the font a smaller size is one solution, but
On Thu, 12 Jan 2012, Rich Shepard wrote:
Is there a way to do this?
I found the rotating package, but I'm having difficulty using it. Perhaps
I need to modify the LaTeX output manually?
Rich
On Thu, 12 Jan 2012, Rich Shepard wrote:
I've looked in TLC2 without finding the solution to splitting an inline
equation when it's in a table column. I have two long equations in a
2-column table and they make the table much too wide; it extends past the
text width on the right.
I've
On Thu, 12 Jan 2012, Rich Shepard wrote:
table within \being{sidewaystable} and \end{sidewaystable}, or
\being{landscape} and \end{landscape}.
See? It's that sort of a day. Those should be \begin{... and not
\being{...
Sigh,
Rich
Not sure to which of these I should respond. :-) In approximately chronological
order:
1. IMHO inline equations should never be long. If it's long enough to give you
margin/column width headaches, I'd do it display mode, which gives you access to
multiline equation formats.
2. Rotating a table
On Thu, 12 Jan 2012, Paul A. Rubin wrote:
Not sure to which of these I should respond. :-) In approximately chronological
order:
1. IMHO inline equations should never be long. If it's long enough to give you
margin/column width headaches, I'd do it display mode, which gives you access to
On Thu, 12 Jan 2012, Paul A. Rubin wrote:
1. IMHO inline equations should never be long. If it's long enough to give
you margin/column width headaches, I'd do it display mode, which gives you
access to multiline equation formats.
Paul,
Er, ... according to the detailed Math manual, "Only
Rich Shepard writes:
>Er, ... according to the detailed Math manual, "Only inline formulas are
> allowed inside tables." So, that's that.
Nonsense. Simply set the column width or put the formula in a minipage.
--
Enrico
33 matches
Mail list logo
