Re: Multiline and 1.2.0

2002-08-19 Thread Rod Pinna
Thanks, My mistake was trying to enter the \begin{multline} and \end{multline} as ert. It seems to stop the conversion when you use C-m. Rod On Mon, 19 Aug 2002, Dekel Tsur wrote: > On Mon, Aug 19, 2002 at 03:31:34PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote: > > What about > > > > Type \begin{multline

Re: Multiline and 1.2.0

2002-08-19 Thread Rod Pinna
> What about > > Type \begin{multline}1 & 2 \\ 3 & 4\end{multline} > Mark it, > Press C-m? > Yup, that does it. BTW, looking throught the mail list, the was a reference to some docs for math mode for 1.2.0, on Herbert Voss's hints & tricks page. The link to the doc is broken however.

Re: Multiline and 1.2.0

2002-08-19 Thread Dekel Tsur
On Mon, Aug 19, 2002 at 03:31:34PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote: > What about > > Type \begin{multline}1 & 2 \\ 3 & 4\end{multline} > Mark it, > Press C-m? Or just type \begin{multline}\end{multline}, mark it, press C-m, and then use mathed to enter the text inside, using ctrl+enter to add

Re: Multiline and 1.2.0

2002-08-19 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Mon, Aug 19, 2002 at 08:57:03PM +0800, Rod Pinna wrote: > Knowing me, I'm probably being obscure. Example attached. > > Basically, > > Type \begin{multline} as ert > enter inline formula > type \end{multline} as ert That translates to \begin{multline}$...$\end{multline} and LaTeX's ch

Re: Multiline and 1.2.0

2002-08-19 Thread Rod Pinna
Knowing me, I'm probably being obscure. Example attached. Basically, Type \begin{multline} as ert enter inline formula type \end{multline} as ert Rod On Mon, 19 Aug 2002, Andre Poenitz wrote: > On Mon, Aug 19, 2002 at 05:21:14PM +0800, Rod Pinna wrote: > > Inserting the equation bit inline

Re: Multiline and 1.2.0

2002-08-19 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Mon, Aug 19, 2002 at 05:21:14PM +0800, Rod Pinna wrote: > Inserting the equation bit inline with mathed gets me $equation$, which > seems to make latex fall over. What exactly are you doing? Andre' -- Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security, will not have, nor do they

Re: Multiline and 1.2.0

2002-08-19 Thread Rod Pinna
On Mon, 19 Aug 2002, Andre Poenitz wrote: > > M-m w i(_m_ath ro_w_ _i_nsert) should insert a row in "gridded" > structures. I think 1.2.0 has a bug which disables this in inlined > formulas, so you have to switch this to "displayed" (S-M-m) and back. > > Andre' Andre, Thanks. Just compilin

Re: Multiline and 1.2.0

2002-08-19 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Mon, Aug 19, 2002 at 04:58:30PM +0800, Rod Pinna wrote: > Just wondering if it is possible to use multiline and 1.2.0. Should work [well, if called 'multline' at least] > At the moment I tried > > ERT[\begin{mutiline}] > enter formula > ERT[\end{multiline}] >

Multiline and 1.2.0

2002-08-19 Thread Rod Pinna
Hi all, Just wondering if it is possible to use multiline and 1.2.0. At the moment I tried ERT[\begin{mutiline}] enter formula ERT[\end{multiline}] I fall down at the point of entering \\ in mathed, to get a new line. I seem to remember a similar post in the mailing list, but an hour