On Sunday, July 10, 2011 06:54:32 PM Liviu Andronic wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 12:33 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
>
> wrote:
> >>> :-) Release appeared to work just fine :-)
> >>
> >> It (release) seems to work on my box, too.
> >
> > The code checks against rel*, actually. So relative would
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 12:33 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
wrote:
>>> :-) Release appeared to work just fine :-)
>>>
>> It (release) seems to work on my box, too.
>
> The code checks against rel*, actually. So relative would work too :)
>
That's rel-ly nice. :)
Liviu
Le 10/07/2011 23:39, Liviu Andronic a écrit :
On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 11:35 PM, Steve Litt wrote:
rel, not release.
rh
:-) Release appeared to work just fine :-)
It (release) seems to work on my box, too.
The code checks against rel*, actually. So relative would work too :)
JMarc
On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 11:35 PM, Steve Litt wrote:
>> rel, not release.
>>
>> rh
>
> :-) Release appeared to work just fine :-)
>
It (release) seems to work on my box, too.
Liviu
On Sunday, July 10, 2011 03:12:12 PM Richard Heck wrote:
> On 07/09/2011 04:49 PM, Liviu Andronic wrote:
> > On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 9:33 PM, Steve
Litt wrote:
> >> Here was my configure command:
> >> ./configure --with-version-suffix=200
> >> --enable-build-type=release --
> >>
> >> with-qt
On Saturday, July 09, 2011 04:49:07 PM Liviu Andronic wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 9:33 PM, Steve Litt
wrote:
> > Here was my configure command:
> >
> > ./configure --with-version-suffix=200
> > --enable-build-type=release -- with-qt4-dir=/usr/lib/qt4
> >
> > Here was the error message fro
On 07/09/2011 04:49 PM, Liviu Andronic wrote:
On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 9:33 PM, Steve Litt wrote:
Here was my configure command:
./configure --with-version-suffix=200 --enable-build-type=release --
with-qt4-dir=/usr/lib/qt4
rel, not release.
rh
On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 9:33 PM, Steve Litt wrote:
> Here was my configure command:
>
> ./configure --with-version-suffix=200 --enable-build-type=release --
> with-qt4-dir=/usr/lib/qt4
>
> Here was the error message from ./configure:
>
> ==
> The following problems have b
Am Samstag, 9. Juli 2011 schrieb Steve Litt:
> On Saturday, July 09, 2011 06:22:19 AM Liviu Andronic wrote:
> > On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 10:15 AM, Steve Litt
>
> wrote:
> > > On Saturday, July 09, 2011 03:35:24 AM Liviu Andronic wrote:
> > >> On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 6:42 AM, Steve Litt
> > >>
> > >
On Saturday, July 09, 2011 06:22:19 AM Liviu Andronic wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 10:15 AM, Steve Litt
wrote:
> > On Saturday, July 09, 2011 03:35:24 AM Liviu Andronic wrote:
> >> On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 6:42 AM, Steve Litt
> >>
> >> > What am I doing wrong?
> >>
> >> Ubuntu ships the wrong
On 07/09/2011 03:04 PM, Liviu Andronic wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 8:38 PM, Steve Litt wrote:
>> On Saturday, July 09, 2011 06:22:19 AM Liviu Andronic wrote:
>>
>>> ..but if you're OK with building, this should be straightforward:
>>> apt-get build-dep lyx
>>> ./configure --with-version-suffi
On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 8:38 PM, Steve Litt wrote:
> On Saturday, July 09, 2011 06:22:19 AM Liviu Andronic wrote:
>
>> ..but if you're OK with building, this should be straightforward:
>> apt-get build-dep lyx
>> ./configure --with-version-suffix=-svn --enable-build-type=release
>> make
>> make in
On Saturday, July 09, 2011 06:22:19 AM Liviu Andronic wrote:
> ..but if you're OK with building, this should be straightforward:
> apt-get build-dep lyx
> ./configure --with-version-suffix=-svn --enable-build-type=release
> make
> make install
What does "--enable-build-type=release" do for you?
On 07/09/2011 04:15 AM, Steve Litt wrote:
>
> LyX is probably the #2 most important application in my business
> (VimOutliner is #1). It's important enough that I'm willing to compile
> my own, always assuming that there's a 2.x version that compiles well
> on Ubuntu 11.04. What do you think is
On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 10:15 AM, Steve Litt wrote:
> On Saturday, July 09, 2011 03:35:24 AM Liviu Andronic wrote:
>> On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 6:42 AM, Steve Litt
>> > What am I doing wrong?
>>
>> Ubuntu ships the wrong version. See this recent discussion [1][2].
>> See these instructions [3] on how
On Saturday, July 09, 2011 03:35:24 AM Liviu Andronic wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 6:42 AM, Steve Litt
> > What am I doing wrong?
>
> Ubuntu ships the wrong version. See this recent discussion [1][2].
> See these instructions [3] on how to push the update to your
> system (never tried it). Alt
On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 6:42 AM, Steve Litt wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> An untimely computer crash brought me to Ubuntu 11.04, which brought
> me to LyX 2.0.0rc3.
>
> Ctrl+D says "successful DVD preview, but does nothing. The View menu
> gives no ps2pdf choice, and when I click the "View other formats"
>
17 matches
Mail list logo
