I have sent this Mail erraneously to
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
it should have gone to the lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
>
> We are glad to announce the release of LyX 1.5.0 (release candidate 2).
> We expect this to be the last release before 1.5.0, and until the
> first stable release only critical bugs a
On 6/28/07, Wolfgang Engelmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have sent this Mail erraneously to
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
it should have gone to the lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
>
> We are glad to announce the release of LyX 1.5.0 (release candidate 2).
> We expect this to be the last release before 1.5.
On Thursday 28 June 2007 15:25:07 Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
> I am planning to try 1.5.0 (release candidate 2) out and would appreciate
> if somebody could tell me whether and how I can do it without throwing my
> 1.4.3 version out (Debian etch). Should I create a new user in my home?
Wolf
On Thursday 28 June 2007 15:03:05 Urtzi Jauregi wrote:
>
> As usual, remember not to save important documents with RC2 as the
> stable
> version won't be able to open them.
What is the latest version that can save documents that can be opened in
final?
> Cheers,
>
> - Urtzi -
On Thursday 28 June 2007 16:34:12 killermike wrote:
> On Thursday 28 June 2007 15:03:05 Urtzi Jauregi wrote:
> > As usual, remember not to save important documents with RC2 as the
> > stable version won't be able to open them.
>
> What is the latest version that can save documents that can be o
On Thursday 28 June 2007 19:19:57 José Matos wrote:
> The update path is always guaranteed. That means that 1.5.0 should be able
> to read any document made by svn, beta or release candidate versions.
I wasn't clear enough. What I meant was that the *now stable*
(1.4-series)
LyX won't re
On Thursday 28 June 2007 18:41:25 Urtzi Jauregi wrote:
> On Thursday 28 June 2007 19:19:57 José Matos wrote:
> > The update path is always guaranteed. That means that 1.5.0 should be
> > able to read any document made by svn, beta or release candidate
> > versions.
>
> I wasn't clear enough.
José Matos schrieb am 28.06.2007:
The update path is always guaranteed. That means that 1.5.0 should be able
to read any document made by svn, beta or release candidate versions.
Does that mean that a file written with rc2 can be opened by rc1?
Because I have here a file composed with rc2 (
Dominik Waßenhoven wrote:
José Matos schrieb am 28.06.2007:
The update path is always guaranteed. That means that 1.5.0 should
be able to read any document made by svn, beta or release candidate
versions.
Does that mean that a file written with rc2 can be opened by rc1?
No, the opposite
Abdelrazak Younes schrieb am 29.06.2007:
Dominik Waßenhoven wrote:
José Matos schrieb am 28.06.2007:
The update path is always guaranteed. That means that 1.5.0 should
be able to read any document made by svn, beta or release candidate
versions.
Does that mean that a file written with rc
On Friday 29 June 2007 11:14:25 Dominik Waßenhoven wrote:
> > If you really don't want to install rc2, you should at least copy the
> > lib/lyx2lyx directory from the rc2 tarball and replace the one in your
> > rc1 installation. This way, you will be able to open the rc2 generated
> > document with
11 matches
Mail list logo