Am Thu, 2 Apr 2020 16:45:37 -0400
schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck :
> On 4/2/20 2:54 PM, Xaver Gerster wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 02.04.20 20:38, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
> >> On 4/2/20 12:09 PM, Xaver Gerster wrote:
> >>> Dear LyX users,
> >>> I am lacking a "revtex4-2.layout" in my (latest)
On 4/2/20 2:54 PM, Xaver Gerster wrote:
>
>
> On 02.04.20 20:38, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
>> On 4/2/20 12:09 PM, Xaver Gerster wrote:
>>> Dear LyX users,
>>> I am lacking a "revtex4-2.layout" in my (latest) LyX ver. 2.3.4.2. Is
>>> this really true?
>>> Stemming from the APS, the revtex
On 02.04.20 20:38, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
On 4/2/20 12:09 PM, Xaver Gerster wrote:
Dear LyX users,
I am lacking a "revtex4-2.layout" in my (latest) LyX ver. 2.3.4.2. Is
this really true?
Stemming from the APS, the revtex package is probably among some of
the most heavily used latex
On 4/2/20 12:09 PM, Xaver Gerster wrote:
> Dear LyX users,
> I am lacking a "revtex4-2.layout" in my (latest) LyX ver. 2.3.4.2. Is
> this really true?
> Stemming from the APS, the revtex package is probably among some of
> the most heavily used latex packages in natural science and physics.
> The
