On Friday 14 January 2005 22:24, Matej Cepl wrote:
Hi,
while reading a Steve Litt's column on writing technical books
(http://www.troubleshooters.com/tpromag/200201/200201.htm) I found this:
This is not completely correct. If you don't need BibTeX (I do), then you
can pretty easily create
On Tuesday 18 January 2005 02:36 pm, Jose' Matos wrote:
On Friday 14 January 2005 22:24, Matej Cepl wrote:
Hi,
while reading a Steve Litt's column on writing technical books
(http://www.troubleshooters.com/tpromag/200201/200201.htm) I found this:
This is not completely correct. If you
Steve Litt wrote:
* At this point, now that I'm satisfied with the LyX native format, what
would be my advantage in outputting to xml?
Using a standard _document_ format (which LaTeX is not) with long-term
storing availability (http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~mgk25/publ-tips/#make). Will
you have LyX
On Tuesday 18 January 2005 06:01 pm, Matej Cepl wrote:
Steve Litt wrote:
* At this point, now that I'm satisfied with the LyX native format, what
would be my advantage in outputting to xml?
Using a standard _document_ format (which LaTeX is not) with long-term
storing availability
On Friday 14 January 2005 22:24, Matej Cepl wrote:
Hi,
while reading a Steve Litt's column on writing technical books
(http://www.troubleshooters.com/tpromag/200201/200201.htm) I found this:
This is not completely correct. If you don't need BibTeX (I do), then you
can pretty easily create
On Tuesday 18 January 2005 02:36 pm, Jose' Matos wrote:
On Friday 14 January 2005 22:24, Matej Cepl wrote:
Hi,
while reading a Steve Litt's column on writing technical books
(http://www.troubleshooters.com/tpromag/200201/200201.htm) I found this:
This is not completely correct. If you
Steve Litt wrote:
* At this point, now that I'm satisfied with the LyX native format, what
would be my advantage in outputting to xml?
Using a standard _document_ format (which LaTeX is not) with long-term
storing availability (http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~mgk25/publ-tips/#make). Will
you have LyX
On Tuesday 18 January 2005 06:01 pm, Matej Cepl wrote:
Steve Litt wrote:
* At this point, now that I'm satisfied with the LyX native format, what
would be my advantage in outputting to xml?
Using a standard _document_ format (which LaTeX is not) with long-term
storing availability
On Friday 14 January 2005 22:24, Matej Cepl wrote:
> Hi,
>
> while reading a Steve Litt's column on writing technical books
> (http://www.troubleshooters.com/tpromag/200201/200201.htm) I found this:
>
> This is not completely correct. If you don't need BibTeX (I do), then you
> can pretty easily
On Tuesday 18 January 2005 02:36 pm, Jose' Matos wrote:
> On Friday 14 January 2005 22:24, Matej Cepl wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > while reading a Steve Litt's column on writing technical books
> > (http://www.troubleshooters.com/tpromag/200201/200201.htm) I found this:
> >
> > This is not completely
Steve Litt wrote:
> * At this point, now that I'm satisfied with the LyX native format, what
> would be my advantage in outputting to xml?
Using a standard _document_ format (which LaTeX is not) with long-term
storing availability (http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~mgk25/publ-tips/#make). Will
you have
On Tuesday 18 January 2005 06:01 pm, Matej Cepl wrote:
> Steve Litt wrote:
> > * At this point, now that I'm satisfied with the LyX native format, what
> > would be my advantage in outputting to xml?
>
> Using a standard _document_ format (which LaTeX is not) with long-term
> storing availability
Hi,
while reading a Steve Litt's column on writing technical books
(http://www.troubleshooters.com/tpromag/200201/200201.htm) I found this:
ButDocbookhaditsownproblems.IcouldhaveusedEmacstofrontendmy
Docbook,butIdon'tknowEmacsandhavehadtroubletryingtolearnit.
Matej Cepl wrote:
Comments?
I can't comment on the ability of the script to do the task you set it, but
here's some comments on the script itself:
Isn't function a bash-ism? You can just use lyxvalue here.
function lyxvalue()
You should enclose $2 in double quotes. It might contain spaces.
Hi,
while reading a Steve Litt's column on writing technical books
(http://www.troubleshooters.com/tpromag/200201/200201.htm) I found this:
ButDocbookhaditsownproblems.IcouldhaveusedEmacstofrontendmy
Docbook,butIdon'tknowEmacsandhavehadtroubletryingtolearnit.
Matej Cepl wrote:
Comments?
I can't comment on the ability of the script to do the task you set it, but
here's some comments on the script itself:
Isn't function a bash-ism? You can just use lyxvalue here.
function lyxvalue()
You should enclose $2 in double quotes. It might contain spaces.
Hi,
while reading a Steve Litt's column on writing technical books
(http://www.troubleshooters.com/tpromag/200201/200201.htm) I found this:
But Docbook had its own problems. I could have used Emacs to front end my
Docbook, but I don't know Emacs and have had trouble trying to learn it.
LyX
Matej Cepl wrote:
> Comments?
I can't comment on the ability of the script to do the task you set it, but
here's some comments on the script itself:
Isn't "function" a bash-ism? You can just use "lyxvalue" here.
function lyxvalue()
You should enclose $2 in double quotes. It might contain
18 matches
Mail list logo
