Re: Why no new para after enumeration? (1.3.4)

2012-06-05 Thread Udi Eilon
Hello everyone. This solution (stdlist.inc) did not work for me.. I just tried it. The PDF file still have no indentation after enumerated lists. Has anyone found another way to solve this bug? Udi

Re: Why no new para after enumeration? (1.3.4)

2012-06-05 Thread Liviu Andronic
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 9:53 AM, Udi Eilon ehudei...@gmail.com wrote: This solution (stdlist.inc) did not work for me.. I just tried it. The PDF file still have no indentation after enumerated lists. Has anyone found another way to solve this bug? In the subject header you indicate: 1.3.4. By

Re: Why no new para after enumeration? (1.3.4)

2012-06-05 Thread Udi Eilon
Hello everyone. This solution (stdlist.inc) did not work for me.. I just tried it. The PDF file still have no indentation after enumerated lists. Has anyone found another way to solve this bug? Udi

Re: Why no new para after enumeration? (1.3.4)

2012-06-05 Thread Liviu Andronic
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 9:53 AM, Udi Eilon ehudei...@gmail.com wrote: This solution (stdlist.inc) did not work for me.. I just tried it. The PDF file still have no indentation after enumerated lists. Has anyone found another way to solve this bug? In the subject header you indicate: 1.3.4. By

Re: Why no new para after enumeration? (1.3.4)

2012-06-05 Thread Udi Eilon
Hello everyone. This solution (stdlist.inc) did not work for me.. I just tried it. The PDF file still have no indentation after enumerated lists. Has anyone found another way to solve this bug? Udi

Re: Why no new para after enumeration? (1.3.4)

2012-06-05 Thread Liviu Andronic
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 9:53 AM, Udi Eilon wrote: > This solution (stdlist.inc) did not work for me.. I just tried it. The PDF > file > still have no indentation after enumerated lists. > Has anyone found another way to solve this bug? > In the subject header you indicate:

Re: Why no new para after enumeration? (1.3.4)

2004-04-06 Thread Angus Leeming
Nawfal bin Mohmad Rouyan wrote: On Mon, 2004-04-05 at 19:05, Angus Leeming wrote: Reuben Thomas wrote: snip Reuben, I believe that this is configurable behaviour. Hack your ${PREFIX}/share/lyx/layouts/stdlists.inc file, changing NextNoIndent to 0. (Your lyx executable is to be found at

Re: Why no new para after enumeration? (1.3.4)

2004-04-06 Thread Reuben Thomas
Nawfal, you could cheat by outputting a protected space and then starting a new paragraph. Ugly. This explains why I thought I couldn't override the system stdlists.inc. -- http://rrt.sc3d.org/ | impeccable, a. not liable to detection (Bierce)

Re: Why no new para after enumeration? (1.3.4)

2004-04-06 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Angus == Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Angus Jean-Marc, I believe that this is the code that generates the Angus latex (paragraph.C, line 1605): Angus if (style-isEnvironment()) { os \\end{ Angus style-latexname() }\n; texrow.newline(); Angus } Angus Does it not

Re: Why no new para after enumeration? (1.3.4)

2004-04-06 Thread Angus Leeming
Nawfal bin Mohmad Rouyan wrote: On Mon, 2004-04-05 at 19:05, Angus Leeming wrote: Reuben Thomas wrote: snip Reuben, I believe that this is configurable behaviour. Hack your ${PREFIX}/share/lyx/layouts/stdlists.inc file, changing NextNoIndent to 0. (Your lyx executable is to be found at

Re: Why no new para after enumeration? (1.3.4)

2004-04-06 Thread Reuben Thomas
Nawfal, you could cheat by outputting a protected space and then starting a new paragraph. Ugly. This explains why I thought I couldn't override the system stdlists.inc. -- http://rrt.sc3d.org/ | impeccable, a. not liable to detection (Bierce)

Re: Why no new para after enumeration? (1.3.4)

2004-04-06 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Angus == Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Angus Jean-Marc, I believe that this is the code that generates the Angus latex (paragraph.C, line 1605): Angus if (style-isEnvironment()) { os \\end{ Angus style-latexname() }\n; texrow.newline(); Angus } Angus Does it not

Re: Why no new para after enumeration? (1.3.4)

2004-04-06 Thread Angus Leeming
Nawfal bin Mohmad Rouyan wrote: > On Mon, 2004-04-05 at 19:05, Angus Leeming wrote: >> Reuben Thomas wrote: > > > >> Reuben, I believe that this is configurable behaviour. Hack your >> ${PREFIX}/share/lyx/layouts/stdlists.inc file, changing >> NextNoIndent to 0. (Your lyx executable is to be

Re: Why no new para after enumeration? (1.3.4)

2004-04-06 Thread Reuben Thomas
> Nawfal, you could cheat by outputting a protected space and then > starting a new paragraph. Ugly. This explains why I thought I couldn't override the system stdlists.inc. -- http://rrt.sc3d.org/ | impeccable, a. not liable to detection (Bierce)

Re: Why no new para after enumeration? (1.3.4)

2004-04-06 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Angus> Jean-Marc, I believe that this is the code that generates the Angus> latex (paragraph.C, line 1605): Angus> if (style->isEnvironment()) { os << "\\end{" << Angus> style->latexname() << "}\n"; texrow.newline(); Angus>

Why no new para after enumeration? (1.3.4)

2004-04-05 Thread Reuben Thomas
Why doesn't LyX leave a paragraph gap between an enumeration (say) and a standard paragraph? This means it's impossible to control indentation at the beginning of the paragraph following the indent without resorting to ERT. -- http://rrt.sc3d.org/ | impeccable, a. not liable to detection

Re: Why no new para after enumeration? (1.3.4)

2004-04-05 Thread
5 2004 14:12 Reuben Thomas (a): Why doesn't LyX leave a paragraph gap between an enumeration (say) and a standard paragraph? This means it's impossible to control indentation at the beginning of the paragraph following the indent without resorting to ERT. The standard is not to make

Re: Why no new para after enumeration? (1.3.4)

2004-04-05 Thread Reuben Thomas
? ? ?? 5 ?? 2004 14:12 Reuben Thomas ???(a): Why doesn't LyX leave a paragraph gap between an enumeration (say) and a standard paragraph? This means it's impossible to control indentation at the beginning of the paragraph following the indent without resorting to ERT.

Re: Why no new para after enumeration? (1.3.4)

2004-04-05 Thread Angus Leeming
Reuben Thomas wrote: ? ? ?? 5 ?? 2004 14:12 Reuben Thomas ???(a): Why doesn't LyX leave a paragraph gap between an enumeration (say) and a standard paragraph? This means it's impossible to control indentation at the beginning of the paragraph following the indent without

Re: Why no new para after enumeration? (1.3.4)

2004-04-05 Thread Reuben Thomas
Reuben, I believe that this is configurable behaviour. Hack your ${PREFIX}/share/lyx/layouts/stdlists.inc file, changing NextNoIndent to 0. (Your lyx executable is to be found at ${PREFIX}/bin/lyx.) Thanks. Hacking stdlists.inc is acceptable for me, but not really for the user on whose behalf

Re: Why no new para after enumeration? (1.3.4)

2004-04-05 Thread Reuben Thomas
Reuben, I believe that this is configurable behaviour. Hack your ${PREFIX}/share/lyx/layouts/stdlists.inc file, Another problem: am I right in thinking that I can't override /usr/share/lyx/layouts/stdlists.inc with ~/.lyx/layouts/stdlists.inc? Testing suggests that I can't, which sucks. --

Re: Why no new para after enumeration? (1.3.4)

2004-04-05 Thread Angus Leeming
Reuben Thomas wrote: Reuben, I believe that this is configurable behaviour. Hack your ${PREFIX}/share/lyx/layouts/stdlists.inc file, Another problem: am I right in thinking that I can't override /usr/share/lyx/layouts/stdlists.inc with ~/.lyx/layouts/stdlists.inc? Testing suggests that I

Re: Why no new para after enumeration? (1.3.4)

2004-04-05 Thread Reuben Thomas
Easy! This particular developer might start sulking and ignore you if you start using pejorative language. I must have been reading too much slashdot or something recently. I'll stop with the pejoratives, already. Sorry. I'll double check my changes (I changed the NextNoIndents in stdlists.inc

Re: Why no new para after enumeration? (1.3.4)

2004-04-05 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Reuben == Reuben Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Reuben, I believe that this is configurable behaviour. Hack your ${PREFIX}/share/lyx/layouts/stdlists.inc file, Reuben Another problem: am I right in thinking that I can't override Reuben /usr/share/lyx/layouts/stdlists.inc with Reuben

Re: Why no new para after enumeration? (1.3.4)

2004-04-05 Thread Nawfal bin Mohmad Rouyan
On Mon, 2004-04-05 at 19:05, Angus Leeming wrote: Reuben Thomas wrote: snip Reuben, I believe that this is configurable behaviour. Hack your ${PREFIX}/share/lyx/layouts/stdlists.inc file, changing NextNoIndent to 0. (Your lyx executable is to be found at ${PREFIX}/bin/lyx.) I've set

Why no new para after enumeration? (1.3.4)

2004-04-05 Thread Reuben Thomas
Why doesn't LyX leave a paragraph gap between an enumeration (say) and a standard paragraph? This means it's impossible to control indentation at the beginning of the paragraph following the indent without resorting to ERT. -- http://rrt.sc3d.org/ | impeccable, a. not liable to detection

Re: Why no new para after enumeration? (1.3.4)

2004-04-05 Thread
5 2004 14:12 Reuben Thomas (a): Why doesn't LyX leave a paragraph gap between an enumeration (say) and a standard paragraph? This means it's impossible to control indentation at the beginning of the paragraph following the indent without resorting to ERT. The standard is not to make

Re: Why no new para after enumeration? (1.3.4)

2004-04-05 Thread Reuben Thomas
? ? ?? 5 ?? 2004 14:12 Reuben Thomas ???(a): Why doesn't LyX leave a paragraph gap between an enumeration (say) and a standard paragraph? This means it's impossible to control indentation at the beginning of the paragraph following the indent without resorting to ERT.

Re: Why no new para after enumeration? (1.3.4)

2004-04-05 Thread Angus Leeming
Reuben Thomas wrote: ? ? ?? 5 ?? 2004 14:12 Reuben Thomas ???(a): Why doesn't LyX leave a paragraph gap between an enumeration (say) and a standard paragraph? This means it's impossible to control indentation at the beginning of the paragraph following the indent without

Re: Why no new para after enumeration? (1.3.4)

2004-04-05 Thread Reuben Thomas
Reuben, I believe that this is configurable behaviour. Hack your ${PREFIX}/share/lyx/layouts/stdlists.inc file, changing NextNoIndent to 0. (Your lyx executable is to be found at ${PREFIX}/bin/lyx.) Thanks. Hacking stdlists.inc is acceptable for me, but not really for the user on whose behalf

Re: Why no new para after enumeration? (1.3.4)

2004-04-05 Thread Reuben Thomas
Reuben, I believe that this is configurable behaviour. Hack your ${PREFIX}/share/lyx/layouts/stdlists.inc file, Another problem: am I right in thinking that I can't override /usr/share/lyx/layouts/stdlists.inc with ~/.lyx/layouts/stdlists.inc? Testing suggests that I can't, which sucks. --

Re: Why no new para after enumeration? (1.3.4)

2004-04-05 Thread Angus Leeming
Reuben Thomas wrote: Reuben, I believe that this is configurable behaviour. Hack your ${PREFIX}/share/lyx/layouts/stdlists.inc file, Another problem: am I right in thinking that I can't override /usr/share/lyx/layouts/stdlists.inc with ~/.lyx/layouts/stdlists.inc? Testing suggests that I

Re: Why no new para after enumeration? (1.3.4)

2004-04-05 Thread Reuben Thomas
Easy! This particular developer might start sulking and ignore you if you start using pejorative language. I must have been reading too much slashdot or something recently. I'll stop with the pejoratives, already. Sorry. I'll double check my changes (I changed the NextNoIndents in stdlists.inc

Re: Why no new para after enumeration? (1.3.4)

2004-04-05 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Reuben == Reuben Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Reuben, I believe that this is configurable behaviour. Hack your ${PREFIX}/share/lyx/layouts/stdlists.inc file, Reuben Another problem: am I right in thinking that I can't override Reuben /usr/share/lyx/layouts/stdlists.inc with Reuben

Re: Why no new para after enumeration? (1.3.4)

2004-04-05 Thread Nawfal bin Mohmad Rouyan
On Mon, 2004-04-05 at 19:05, Angus Leeming wrote: Reuben Thomas wrote: snip Reuben, I believe that this is configurable behaviour. Hack your ${PREFIX}/share/lyx/layouts/stdlists.inc file, changing NextNoIndent to 0. (Your lyx executable is to be found at ${PREFIX}/bin/lyx.) I've set

Why no new para after enumeration? (1.3.4)

2004-04-05 Thread Reuben Thomas
Why doesn't LyX leave a paragraph gap between an enumeration (say) and a standard paragraph? This means it's impossible to control indentation at the beginning of the paragraph following the indent without resorting to ERT. -- http://rrt.sc3d.org/ | impeccable, a. not liable to detection

Re: Why no new para after enumeration? (1.3.4)

2004-04-05 Thread Пашев Игорь Николаевич
В сообщении от 5 Апрель 2004 14:12 Reuben Thomas написал(a): > Why doesn't LyX leave a paragraph gap between an enumeration (say) and a > standard paragraph? This means it's impossible to control indentation at > the beginning of the paragraph following the indent without resorting to > ERT. The

Re: Why no new para after enumeration? (1.3.4)

2004-04-05 Thread Reuben Thomas
> ? ? ?? 5 ?? 2004 14:12 Reuben Thomas ???(a): > > Why doesn't LyX leave a paragraph gap between an enumeration (say) and a > > standard paragraph? This means it's impossible to control indentation at > > the beginning of the paragraph following the indent without resorting to > >

Re: Why no new para after enumeration? (1.3.4)

2004-04-05 Thread Angus Leeming
Reuben Thomas wrote: >> ? ? ?? 5 ?? 2004 14:12 Reuben Thomas ???(a): >> > Why doesn't LyX leave a paragraph gap between an enumeration >> > (say) and a standard paragraph? This means it's impossible to >> > control indentation at the beginning of the paragraph following >> > the

Re: Why no new para after enumeration? (1.3.4)

2004-04-05 Thread Reuben Thomas
> Reuben, I believe that this is configurable behaviour. Hack your > ${PREFIX}/share/lyx/layouts/stdlists.inc file, changing NextNoIndent > to 0. (Your lyx executable is to be found at ${PREFIX}/bin/lyx.) Thanks. Hacking stdlists.inc is acceptable for me, but not really for the user on whose

Re: Why no new para after enumeration? (1.3.4)

2004-04-05 Thread Reuben Thomas
> Reuben, I believe that this is configurable behaviour. Hack your > ${PREFIX}/share/lyx/layouts/stdlists.inc file, Another problem: am I right in thinking that I can't override /usr/share/lyx/layouts/stdlists.inc with ~/.lyx/layouts/stdlists.inc? Testing suggests that I can't, which sucks. --

Re: Why no new para after enumeration? (1.3.4)

2004-04-05 Thread Angus Leeming
Reuben Thomas wrote: >> Reuben, I believe that this is configurable behaviour. Hack your >> ${PREFIX}/share/lyx/layouts/stdlists.inc file, > > Another problem: am I right in thinking that I can't override > /usr/share/lyx/layouts/stdlists.inc with > ~/.lyx/layouts/stdlists.inc? Testing suggests

Re: Why no new para after enumeration? (1.3.4)

2004-04-05 Thread Reuben Thomas
> Easy! This particular developer might start sulking and ignore you if > you start using pejorative language. I must have been reading too much slashdot or something recently. I'll stop with the pejoratives, already. Sorry. I'll double check my changes (I changed the NextNoIndents in

Re: Why no new para after enumeration? (1.3.4)

2004-04-05 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Reuben" == Reuben Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Reuben, I believe that this is configurable behaviour. Hack your >> ${PREFIX}/share/lyx/layouts/stdlists.inc file, Reuben> Another problem: am I right in thinking that I can't override Reuben> /usr/share/lyx/layouts/stdlists.inc with

Re: Why no new para after enumeration? (1.3.4)

2004-04-05 Thread Nawfal bin Mohmad Rouyan
On Mon, 2004-04-05 at 19:05, Angus Leeming wrote: > Reuben Thomas wrote: > Reuben, I believe that this is configurable behaviour. Hack your > ${PREFIX}/share/lyx/layouts/stdlists.inc file, changing NextNoIndent > to 0. (Your lyx executable is to be found at ${PREFIX}/bin/lyx.) I've set