On Sat, Oct 05, 2002 at 10:49:43PM -0500, Bo Peng wrote:
This is not a big prolem but it would be better to avoid this kind of
problem by adding amsmath to the default style.
No good as some people don't want AMS...
Note that you can switch on AMS using the preferences dialog.
Andre'
--
On Mon, Oct 07, 2002 at 10:04:02AM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Sat, Oct 05, 2002 at 10:49:43PM -0500, Bo Peng wrote:
This is not a big prolem but it would be better to avoid this kind of
problem by adding amsmath to the default style.
No good as some people don't want AMS...
Note
On Mon, Oct 07, 2002 at 10:24:28AM -0500, Bo Peng wrote:
I do not know how to swith on AMS ... but this is not a big deal to
me. Maybe lyx can solve this problem by: once a user uses cases
environment, lyx adds ams support automatically.
This problem is unsolvable by clever guessing. I
Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Mon, Oct 07, 2002 at 10:24:28AM -0500, Bo Peng wrote:
I do not know how to swith on AMS ... but this is not a big deal to
me. Maybe lyx can solve this problem by: once a user uses cases
environment, lyx adds ams support automatically.
This problem is unsolvable
On Mon, Oct 07, 2002 at 05:39:30PM +0200, Herbert Voss wrote:
I do not agree! You have most of the amsstuff in lib/symbols, f.ex.
...
hexagonwasy 55 0 xx
Nevertheless it breaks if a user does not want AMS but uses a hexagon
macro of his own. In this case LyX
On Mon, Oct 07, 2002 at 05:43:41PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
Yes, that would be a good idea if we want to stick to the guessing
mechanism.
I did not know that this has already been discussed in lyx-devl, and I
do not have any better idea than you guys. If lyx refuses to guess,
maybe it can
On Sat, Oct 05, 2002 at 10:49:43PM -0500, Bo Peng wrote:
This is not a big prolem but it would be better to avoid this kind of
problem by adding amsmath to the default style.
No good as some people don't want AMS...
Note that you can switch on AMS using the preferences dialog.
Andre'
--
On Mon, Oct 07, 2002 at 10:04:02AM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Sat, Oct 05, 2002 at 10:49:43PM -0500, Bo Peng wrote:
This is not a big prolem but it would be better to avoid this kind of
problem by adding amsmath to the default style.
No good as some people don't want AMS...
Note
On Mon, Oct 07, 2002 at 10:24:28AM -0500, Bo Peng wrote:
I do not know how to swith on AMS ... but this is not a big deal to
me. Maybe lyx can solve this problem by: once a user uses cases
environment, lyx adds ams support automatically.
This problem is unsolvable by clever guessing. I
Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Mon, Oct 07, 2002 at 10:24:28AM -0500, Bo Peng wrote:
I do not know how to swith on AMS ... but this is not a big deal to
me. Maybe lyx can solve this problem by: once a user uses cases
environment, lyx adds ams support automatically.
This problem is unsolvable
On Mon, Oct 07, 2002 at 05:39:30PM +0200, Herbert Voss wrote:
I do not agree! You have most of the amsstuff in lib/symbols, f.ex.
...
hexagonwasy 55 0 xx
Nevertheless it breaks if a user does not want AMS but uses a hexagon
macro of his own. In this case LyX
On Mon, Oct 07, 2002 at 05:43:41PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
Yes, that would be a good idea if we want to stick to the guessing
mechanism.
I did not know that this has already been discussed in lyx-devl, and I
do not have any better idea than you guys. If lyx refuses to guess,
maybe it can
On Sat, Oct 05, 2002 at 10:49:43PM -0500, Bo Peng wrote:
> This is not a big prolem but it would be better to avoid this kind of
> problem by adding amsmath to the default style.
No good as some people don't want AMS...
Note that you can "switch on" AMS using the preferences dialog.
Andre'
On Mon, Oct 07, 2002 at 10:04:02AM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 05, 2002 at 10:49:43PM -0500, Bo Peng wrote:
> > This is not a big prolem but it would be better to avoid this kind of
> > problem by adding amsmath to the default style.
> No good as some people don't want AMS...
>
On Mon, Oct 07, 2002 at 10:24:28AM -0500, Bo Peng wrote:
> I do not know how to "swith on" AMS ... but this is not a big deal to
> me. Maybe lyx can solve this problem by: once a user uses cases
> environment, lyx adds ams support automatically.
This problem is unsolvable by clever guessing.
Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 07, 2002 at 10:24:28AM -0500, Bo Peng wrote:
>
>>I do not know how to "swith on" AMS ... but this is not a big deal to
>>me. Maybe lyx can solve this problem by: once a user uses cases
>>environment, lyx adds ams support automatically.
>>
>
> This problem
On Mon, Oct 07, 2002 at 05:39:30PM +0200, Herbert Voss wrote:
> I do not agree! You have most of the amsstuff in lib/symbols, f.ex.
> ...
> hexagonwasy 55 0 xx
Nevertheless it breaks if a user does not want AMS but uses a "hexagon"
macro of his own. In this case LyX
On Mon, Oct 07, 2002 at 05:43:41PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> Yes, that would be a good idea if we want to stick to the guessing
> mechanism.
I did not know that this has already been discussed in lyx-devl, and I
do not have any better idea than you guys. If lyx refuses to guess,
maybe it
I start lyx, create a new document, insert math-cases environment, view
dvi. I get two ERRORS!
This is because the default document style article does not have
amsmath. The solution is either adding
\usepackage{amsmath}
in the preamble or using another document style like article(AMS).
I start lyx, create a new document, insert math-cases environment, view
dvi. I get two ERRORS!
This is because the default document style article does not have
amsmath. The solution is either adding
\usepackage{amsmath}
in the preamble or using another document style like article(AMS).
I start lyx, create a new document, insert math->cases environment, view
dvi. I get two ERRORS!
This is because the default document style article does not have
amsmath. The solution is either adding
\usepackage{amsmath}
in the preamble or using another document style like article(AMS).
21 matches
Mail list logo
