Hi
I have several instances where I write
'refering to equations 1.x and 1.y'.
I am now using the \autoref part of hyperref and it prioduces nice out put but
with multiple references like above I get
'refering to equation 1.x and equation 1.y'
It is possible using this package to get the
Geoffrey Lloyd wrote:
I have several instances where I write
'refering to equations 1.x and 1.y'.
I am now using the \autoref part of hyperref and it produces nice out put
but with multiple references like above I get
'refering to equation 1.x and equation 1.y'
It is possible using
Hi
I have several instances where I write
'refering to equations 1.x and 1.y'.
I am now using the \autoref part of hyperref and it prioduces nice out put but
with multiple references like above I get
'refering to equation 1.x and equation 1.y'
It is possible using this package to get the
Geoffrey Lloyd wrote:
I have several instances where I write
'refering to equations 1.x and 1.y'.
I am now using the \autoref part of hyperref and it produces nice out put
but with multiple references like above I get
'refering to equation 1.x and equation 1.y'
It is possible using
Hi
I have several instances where I write
'refering to equations 1.x and 1.y'.
I am now using the \autoref part of hyperref and it prioduces nice out put but
with multiple references like above I get
'refering to equation 1.x and equation 1.y'
It is possible using this package to get the
Geoffrey Lloyd wrote:
I have several instances where I write
'refering to equations 1.x and 1.y'.
I am now using the \autoref part of hyperref and it produces nice out put
> but with multiple references like above I get
'refering to equation 1.x and equation 1.y'
It is possible using
