Re: [M100] ROM burning questions

2016-05-16 Thread Stephen Adolph
t stuck a plain socket in and a plain dip >> >>> 27c256. >> >>> No complications there. Same goes for late m100 too apparently though >> >>> both >> >>> my m100's needed the adapter. >> >>> >> >>> -- >> >>> bkw &g

Re: [M100] ROM burning questions

2016-05-16 Thread John R. Hogerhuis
As counterpoint I'd say Rex is an excellent dev and hacking target because it is widely owned in this community and it works well. You plug it in and never unplug it. It lets you save ram images along with ROM support. And buying from another community member supports future work. It is a unique

Re: [M100] ROM burning questions

2016-05-16 Thread Stephen Adolph
k of being immodest I should point out what I >>>> think >>>> are some advantages of the 'Combo' board: >>>> >>>> Whether you want to upgrade the System ROM and/or add an Option ROM in >>>> either an old or a new M100/T102 you use the same b

Re: [M100] ROM burning questions

2016-05-16 Thread Atsushi Takahashi
; convert the pinout back to standard JEDEC; no problem, just assemble another >>> adapter 'in reverse' as it were, with a socket. >>> >>> So the one PCB essentially does the same job as all three different >>> Figtronix ones; since you get a minimum of six boards

Re: [M100] ROM burning questions

2016-05-16 Thread Stephen Adolph
nconsistent. At least I made my enclosure for the MISE public, >> >>>> including >> >>>> a >> >>>> slick non-trivial arrangement to hold the cf card reader which does >> >>>> not >> >>>> have >> >

Re: [M100] ROM burning questions

2016-05-16 Thread John R. Hogerhuis
t...@gmail.com > <javascript:;>> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> Thanks for posting those links. When I mentioned the various options > for > >>>>> adding/upgrading System and Option ROMs I wanted to include this one > but &

Re: [M100] ROM burning questions

2016-05-16 Thread Stephen Adolph
;>>> including >>>>>> a >>>>>> slick non-trivial arrangement to hold the cf card reader which does not >>>>>> have >>>>>> any nice mounting holes or anything, if I do say so myself. ;) ) >>>>>> >>>>

Re: [M100] ROM burning questions

2016-05-16 Thread Stephen Adolph
100 too apparently though >>>>> both >>>>> my m100's needed the adapter. >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> bkw >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 3:54 PM, Mike Stein <mhs.st...@gmail.com> >>>>> wr

Re: [M100] ROM burning questions

2016-05-16 Thread Ken Pettit
del 100 Discussion Sent: Saturday, May 14, 2016 11:42 PM Subject: Re: [M100] ROM burning questions ...Re-post without pic... Old m100 takes a non-standard pinout, new m100 and all t102 takes a standard 27C256 pinout. I just did an old m100 using this plcc adapter: https://oshpark.com/shared_proj

Re: [M100] ROM burning questions

2016-05-16 Thread Stephen Adolph
ng/upgrading System and Option ROMs I wanted to include this one but >>>>> at >>>>> the time the link at Oshpark didn't seem to work; I couldn't find any >>>>> mention on his Figtronix site either so I assumed they were no longer >>>>&g

Re: [M100] ROM burning questions

2016-05-16 Thread Stephen Adolph
; is that in a T102 you can add an Option ROM without removing the System >>>> ROM >>>> chip; however, at the risk of being immodest I should point out what I >>>> think >>>> are some advantages of the 'Combo' board: >>>> >>>> W

Re: [M100] ROM burning questions

2016-05-16 Thread Ken Pettit
Original Message - From: Brian White To: Model 100 Discussion Sent: Saturday, May 14, 2016 11:42 PM Subject: Re: [M100] ROM burning questions ...Re-post without pic... Old m100 takes a non-standard pinout, new m100 and all t102 takes a standard 27C256 pinout. I just did an old m100 using

Re: [M100] ROM burning questions

2016-05-16 Thread Brian White
Brian White <bw.al...@gmail.com> > *To:* Model 100 Discussion <m100@lists.bitchin100.com> > *Sent:* Saturday, May 14, 2016 11:42 PM > *Subject:* Re: [M100] ROM burning questions > > ...Re-post without pic... > > Old m100 takes a non-standard pinout, new m100 and all

Re: [M100] ROM burning questions

2016-05-14 Thread Brian White
And there is this for the option rom. https://oshpark.com/shared_projects/4dLqXOs0 And this to allow reprogramming the module after it's soldered. https://oshpark.com/shared_projects/LqYuxSJQ Or you could use a test clip instead of the programming adapter. I'm still waiting for these to

Re: [M100] ROM burning questions

2016-05-09 Thread Bill Nobel
to:s_ra...@hotmail.com> >> To: Club 100 Model T <mailto:m100@lists.bitchin100.com> >> Sent: Monday, May 09, 2016 4:22 PM >> Subject: Re: [M100] ROM burning questions >> >> Hi Mike, >> I would like to replace my system ROM with a Y2K compatible version. >&

Re: [M100] ROM burning questions

2016-05-09 Thread Mike Stein
: Steven Ranft To: Club 100 Model T Sent: Monday, May 09, 2016 4:22 PM Subject: Re: [M100] ROM burning questions Hi Mike, I would like to replace my system ROM with a Y2K compatible version. I would like to install the best single option ROM I can. Would this chip work? EPROM 256K

Re: [M100] ROM burning questions

2016-05-09 Thread Steven Ranft
Does anyone know where can I buy the adapter board for the ROM Socket? Steve Ranft Savage, MN From: mhs.st...@gmail.com To: m100@lists.bitchin100.com Date: Mon, 9 May 2016 15:25:26 -0400 Subject: Re: [M100] ROM burning questions Hi Steve, Where to begin... First of all, you're talking

[M100] ROM burning questions

2016-05-09 Thread Steven Ranft
I am pretty new to retro computing. But have become an addict in the last year or so. I have Several M-100, M-102, M-200, NEC-8201 and NEC-8300 systems in working order. I also have a ROM Booster PAC. I really have only scratched the surface of learning to use these machines. I bought some