Would have been quicker if someone had of chimed in and said "the headers
are in the debian update" hahahahahaha wouldn't have wasted all that time
with docker
--
website: http://www.machinekit.io blog: http://blog.machinekit.io github:
https://github.com/machinekit
---
You received this
Sounds good.
Everything is possible if you have the patience ;-)
On 04/12/2017 01:56, Rob M wrote:
Ok,
A little update:
Updated my system,
bone-debian-7.11-machinekit-armhf-2017-01-22-4gb.img.xz, using apt-get
update, (had to use apt-offline as no net in the shed).
Ended up with:
Ok,
A little update:
Updated my system, bone-debian-7.11-machinekit-armhf-2017-01-22-4gb.img.xz,
using apt-get update, (had to use apt-offline as no net in the shed).
Ended up with:
*machinekit_0.1.1507308757-1mk.travis.master.gitdbf37ca2~1wheezy_armhf.deb*which
had the needed include
Hi
A year later, how would you answer this question now?
regards
> > - Does the trajectory planner still switch back to 'slow' when using
> more
> > than only XYZ axes, forcing the use of velocity-based extrusion as a
> > workaround?
>
> Yes, I believe this is still the case in both
On 02/12/17 21:13, Rob M wrote:
Ok, I think I may have over thought what I wanted to do.
The goal:
Add some extra I\O pins for a simple control panel.to get
away from the keyboard.
Now that I've
