I don't see what advantage this has over OS X's built-in "open"
command. Typing
% open -a /Applications/Foobar myfile
will open myfile using application Foobar (assuming
"/Applications/Foobar" is a valid path to the binary).
I didn't know! Thanks...
Randal
My guess is that it is a line endings problem - I get this error under most
unix systems if I use a file with macintosh line endings. Can whatever
editor you're using translate the line endings to unix?
Ian
--On Sunday, April 1, 2001 3:16 PM -0800 hciR nellA [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
iH
i
Cool, glad that suggestion helped.
Forest
On Sunday, April 1, 2001, at 07:21 PM, Wazop wrote:
Hello,
On Sunday, April 1, 2001, at 04:49 PM, Forest Dean Feighner wrote:
I'm very new at this, so I may be off-base.
Are you running the cpan shell as root?
Right on! That was the problem!
This is probably a stupid question but, do "Carbon" apps NOT run on OS X if
the disk has been formatted for unix when OS X was installed?
So far I have not abeen able to get either Appleworks or fetch to install
since I reinstalled OS X with a unix disk format.
Fetch complains that it can't
Your definitions are correct, but carbon apps can come in two forms. If you
are careful in writing your carbon app, and compile it in PEF format, it can
run in OS 9 as well as OS X. If you compile into Mach-O, you can use some
native services that you can't with PEF, and it will only run in OS
Hi folks,
There could well be a good reason why messages from the list don't have a Reply-To
header, so please don't take this as a complaint, but I'm curious as to what the story
is.
It seems that the list is managed with 'ezmlm', and I know nothing about it, but I
guess the List-Post
