Re: Cocoa interfaces

2001-09-18 Thread Justin Simoni
Anyway Fred, is there a way for a whole bunch of people to send a message to someone (who?) at Apple asking for them to release their Perl-Cocoa stuff, saying we'll maintain it? Not that I could *personally* maintain it... =) I'll sign that petition :) I could think of a million

Re: Cocoa interfaces

2001-09-18 Thread Jeff Lowrey
At 2:19 PM -0500 9/18/01, Craig S. Cottingham wrote: CoreFoundation is relatively easy, if somewhat tedious, to wrap, since it's straight C. I'm guessing Foundation and AppKit would be tougher, since they're Objective-C. What I haven't found any documentation for yet is how to set up the

Re: Cocoa interfaces

2001-09-18 Thread Craig S. Cottingham
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tuesday, September 18, 2001, at 04:57 , Jeff Lowrey wrote: At 2:19 PM -0500 9/18/01, Craig S. Cottingham wrote: CoreFoundation is relatively easy, if somewhat tedious, to wrap, since it's straight C. I'm guessing Foundation and AppKit would

Re: Cocoa interfaces

2001-09-18 Thread Stefan Rusterholz
On Mon, 17 Sep 2001, Wilfredo Sánchez wrote: On Monday, September 17, 2001, at 05:25 AM, Ask Bjoern Hansen wrote: That sounds insanely cool. How come they won't release it? There is a reasonable apprehension to adding to the list of supported API in Mac OS. It's yet another

Re: Cocoa interfaces

2001-09-18 Thread Ian Ragsdale
On 9/18/01 12:40 PM, Stefan Rusterholz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, 17 Sep 2001, Wilfredo Sánchez wrote: yeah; in MacOS X we could (finally) have applications written in Perl that for the user would look just like any other. So then, let's start a petition =) I think too, that such