Please DON'T

2002-01-24 Thread Cranz, Gregory
Please, pretty please, carbonize MacPerl. I shudder to think of having to differentiate between both versions when debugging or having a conversation on this thread. IMHO, MacPerl was a stopgap that kept the Mac in the game until we've got OS/X i.e. Un*x to work with. It was wonderful I

Why not MacPerl X [Was: Re: Please DON'T]

2002-01-24 Thread Dan Kogai
On 2002.01.25, at 01:17, Cranz, Gregory wrote: Please, pretty please, carbonize MacPerl. I shudder to think of having to differentiate between both versions when debugging or having a conversation on this thread. IMHO, MacPerl was a stopgap that kept the Mac in the game until we've got

Re: Line endings (was: Help with Perl on MacOSX)

2002-01-24 Thread Aaron Hall
On 1/22/2002 at @816, [EMAIL PROTECTED] quoth: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Chris Devers) wrote: stuff alike -- have to either become consistent or agnostic in the way they handle line endings, and I'm not at all sure what the best way to resolve this is on a general level. Inheriting two more or less

Re: Why not MacPerl X [Was: Re: Please DON'T]

2002-01-24 Thread Robert Mah
On 1/24/02 11:43 AM, Dan Kogai [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 2002.01.25, at 01:17, Cranz, Gregory wrote: Please, pretty please, carbonize MacPerl. I shudder to think of having to differentiate between both versions when debugging or having a conversation on this thread. IMHO, MacPerl was