On 1/24/02 11:43 AM, "Dan Kogai" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2002.01.25, at 01:17, Cranz, Gregory wrote:
>>> Please, pretty please, carbonize MacPerl.
>>
>> I shudder to think of having to differentiate between both versions when
>> debugging or having a conversation on this thread.
>>
>> I
On 1/22/2002 at @816, [EMAIL PROTECTED] quoth:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Chris Devers) wrote:
>> stuff alike -- have to either become consistent or agnostic in the way
>> they handle line endings, and I'm not at all sure what the best way to
>> resolve this is on a general level. Inheriting two more o
On 2002.01.25, at 01:17, Cranz, Gregory wrote:
>> Please, pretty please, carbonize MacPerl.
>
> I shudder to think of having to differentiate between both versions when
> debugging or having a conversation on this thread.
>
> IMHO, MacPerl was a stopgap that kept the Mac in the game until we've
>
> Please, pretty please, carbonize MacPerl.
I shudder to think of having to differentiate between both versions when
debugging or having a conversation on this thread.
IMHO, MacPerl was a stopgap that kept the Mac in the game until we've got
OS/X i.e. Un*x to work with. It was wonderful & I us
