Okay, the point's been made. Puneet made a rude comment, and was less
than courteous when he posted a public reply to Randal's private email.
If we're all done spanking him for it, can we get back to his real
question?
On Friday, March 14, 2003, at 01:52 PM, Puneet Kishor wrote:
I was looking
I love these kinds of threads, everything reduced to black and white.
while we're at it, can anyone suggest
* a good text editor for editing perl scripts?
* a decent OS
* who should be running Apple
* which is the most secure version of Unix
* which is the least secure version of Unix
* why the
Dan == Dan Brian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Dan A few seem to have missed the fact that Randal sent a private message
Dan to Puneet. This isn't acceptable regardless of the point, context, or
Dan argument. It should have remained private. The rest is between them.
For clarification, the this
Dan A few seem to have missed the fact that Randal sent a private
message
Dan to Puneet. This isn't acceptable regardless of the point,
context, or
Dan argument. It should have remained private. The rest is between
them.
For clarification, the this isn't acceptable was Puneet's reposting
of my
On Friday, March 14, 2003, at 08:39 PM, Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
I feel sorry for you. Maybe you just haven't matured yet. That's
possible. I remember being younger and stupider than I am now. I
hope you'll take away from this the notion that sometimes there are
things you don't do,
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Randal L. Schwartz) wrote:
I'm also offended that you cc'ed my private email to the list
when my reply to you was private. Technically, that's a copyright
violation, and I could take you to court over that.
It technically isn't, as it is
On Saturday, March 15, 2003, at 12:25 PM, Chris Nandor wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Randal L. Schwartz) wrote:
You don't make fun of a man's name. Period.
That is your opinion, it is not a rule, and stating it as a rule
doesn't
make it one. Your Jedi mind tricks
At 2:03 PM -0800 3/15/03, Bruce Van Allen wrote:
The conclusion, I thought, was the same as in many other
communities: out of respect for others, whether they be prominent
publishers, accomplished programmers, earnest novices, cloaked
gamers, or even clueless FAQ-ignorers, one addresses and
1. I appreciate all the spam on this...makes me feel like I am in
Hawaii.
2. Whatever happened to giving ppl the benefit of the doubt? That is
to say, would it have been sufficient for the people in question who
questioned the usage or play-on-words to have written a short email
directly to
And if anyone's wondering What Would Tim Do?, I think Tim would
want this thread to end so we can get back doing actual work with
Perl on Mac OS X.
Nat
On Saturday, March 15, 2003, at 05:13 PM, Nathan Torkington wrote:
And if anyone's wondering What Would Tim Do?, I think Tim would
want this thread to end so we can get back doing actual work with
Perl on Mac OS X.
Well, before putting this thread to bead, shouldn't someone first
comment on the
I was looking for material on (justifying) Opensource. Besides the usual
suspects (Tim Oh Really and the Gnu and FSF folks), I came across
http://www.dwheeler.com/oss_fs_why.html
I am guessing this is not *our* David Wheeler but someone else with the
same name.
interesting reading and more
Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
Puneet == Puneet Kishor [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Puneet I was looking for material on (justifying) Opensource. Besides the
Puneet usual suspects (Tim Oh Really and the Gnu and FSF folks),
If that's meant to be funny, it's not. If it's because you don't
Puneet == Puneet Kishor [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Puneet Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
Puneet == Puneet Kishor [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Puneet I was looking for material on (justifying) Opensource. Besides the
Puneet usual suspects (Tim Oh Really and the Gnu and FSF folks),
If that's meant
On Friday, March 14, 2003, at 07:22 PM, Puneet Kishor wrote:
Jeez Randal, That _was_ meant to be funny.
Q: How many name of fanatic group here does it take to screw in a
light bulb?
A: That's not funny
--
Lorin Rivers
Marketing Professional
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://homepage.mac.com/lrivers
15 matches
Mail list logo
