ters@perl.org
Subject: Re: Suggestions to better ship Perl on OS X.
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619)
Yes, I'm still the person. The splitting of the perl (and other
projects) into different distributions has been a sore point for a long
time. The historical reason for it was to make a minimum
On Feb 17, 2005, at 8:31 AM, Richard Cook wrote:
Going through old list mail and found this one ... don't know if it's
still relevant, but ... I have "identical" OS X 10.3.8 installs on two
different machines ... identical that is except one has Xcode
Developer Tools installed on it, and the oth
On Feb 17, 2005, at 5:57 AM, Sherm Pendley wrote:
On Feb 17, 2005, at 8:31 AM, Richard Cook wrote:
Going through old list mail and found this one ... don't know if it's
still relevant, but ... I have "identical" OS X 10.3.8 installs on
two different machines ... identical that is except one has X
On Feb 17, 2005, at 6:32 AM, Richard Cook wrote:
On Feb 17, 2005, at 5:57 AM, Sherm Pendley wrote:
On Feb 17, 2005, at 8:31 AM, Richard Cook wrote:
Going through old list mail and found this one ... don't know if
it's still relevant, but ... I have "identical" OS X 10.3.8 installs
on two differen
Yes, you're right ... I suppose that Find in the Finder doesn't find
it because /System is excluded from Find, unless you specifically
choose it?
sudo find / -name "perlfunc*"
ECTED]
Subject: Re: Suggestions to better ship Perl on OS X.
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619)
Yes, I'm still the person. The splitting of the perl (and other
projects) into different distributions has been a sore point for a long
time. The historical reason for it was to make a minimum syst
