On Oct 31, 2013, at 7:10 PM, Paul Taylor wrote:
> On 31/10/2013 21:49, Michael Hall wrote:
>> On Oct 30, 2013, at 4:38 PM, Paul Taylor wrote:
>>
>>> /Applications/Jaikoz.app/Contents/MacOS/Jaikoz
>> I'm assuming this is the appbundler JavaAppLauncher. Which branch? java.net
>> project or infinit
On 31/10/2013 21:49, Michael Hall wrote:
On Oct 30, 2013, at 4:38 PM, Paul Taylor wrote:
/Applications/Jaikoz.app/Contents/MacOS/Jaikoz
I'm assuming this is the appbundler JavaAppLauncher. Which branch? java.net
project or infinitekind? Which OS version was it built on?
Ah, I think you have
On Oct 30, 2013, at 4:38 PM, Paul Taylor wrote:
> /Applications/Jaikoz.app/Contents/MacOS/Jaikoz
I'm assuming this is the appbundler JavaAppLauncher. Which branch? java.net
project or infinitekind? Which OS version was it built on?
Michael Hall
trz nio.2 for OS X http://www195.pair.com/mik3hal
On 31/10/2013 18:38, Mike Swingler wrote:
Is this the full crash log? Are there no thread stacks?
Regards,
Mike Swingler
Apple Inc.
Thats all that comes up with the Crash reporter, Ive now tried another
application that definitently was working on OSX 10.7 with an earlier
version of Java 7 bu
Is this the full crash log? Are there no thread stacks?
Regards,
Mike Swingler
Apple Inc.
Things were working okay with Java 6 ( and some custom libs) but now by
default a Java 7 application is only movable on Mac if you click near
the top of the window (like on Windows), however if I set
toolbar.getRootPane().putClientProperty("apple.awt.draggableWindowBackground")
I can then m
Could you review the updated fix:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~alexsch/8011059/webrev.04/
The reflection is used to skip the Image.getScaledInstance() method
call if it is not overridden by a user.
On 10/29/2013 11:08 PM, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
Hi, Alexander.
The fix looks fine to me i
I had filed the bug report on bugs.sun.com, but I see that it's now on
bugs.openjdk.com, so that may have been part of my confusion. Thanks for
providing me with the info and for fixing my bug report.
-Will Herrmann
On Oct 31, 2013, at 8:18 AM, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
> Hi, Will.
> You can find
Hi, Will.
You can find your bug here:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JI-9007897
On 31.10.2013 0:37, Will Herrmann wrote:
I filed a bug using the link you provided and received an e-mail back saying that it was accepted
as bug #9007897. However, when I try to search for it in the bug datab
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 12:11 PM, Leonid Romanov
wrote:
> I see.. While it might pose an inconvenience in some scenarios on OS X, I
> don't think it's an issue, since Apple JDK 6 behaves the same way, so I'm
> going to close the bug.
yes, I have run into this as well already with Apple's JDK 6
How does Java 7 decide on the max value of heap memory allocated (-Xmx)
if not specified on an OSX bundle, I've read the manual page and it gave
no indication. It seems to be allocated more than the default on Java 6
and I wonder if it varies with the memory available on the machine, that
would
On 31/10/2013 11:11, Leonid Romanov wrote:
I see.. While it might pose an inconvenience in some scenarios on OS
X, I don't think it's an issue, since Apple JDK 6 behaves the same
way, so I'm going to close the bug.
Okay no problem, I now have it working for me since using
setComponentPopup().
I see.. While it might pose an inconvenience in some scenarios on OS X, I don't
think it's an issue, since Apple JDK 6 behaves the same way, so I'm going to
close the bug.
On 29.10.2013, at 15:14, Paul Taylor wrote:
> On 28/10/2013 12:29, Leonid Romanov wrote:
>> Hello,
>> I've filed a bug:
>>
13 matches
Mail list logo
