On Feb 14, 2014, at 9:23 PM, Scott Palmer wrote:
> $ jrunscript -q
> Language AppleScript 2.3 implementation "AppleScriptEngine" 1.1
> Language ECMAScript ECMA - 262 Edition 5.1 implementation "Oracle Nashorn"
> 1.8.0
Thanks, not sure why it doesn't show for me then but thanks.
I'll verify App
$ jrunscript -q
Language AppleScript 2.3 implementation "AppleScriptEngine" 1.1
Language ECMAScript ECMA - 262 Edition 5.1 implementation "Oracle Nashorn"
1.8.0
I have Apples, latest Java 6 runtime as well as JDK 1.7.0_51 and JDK 1.8.0
b129 installed. Based on the "Oracel Nashorn" 1.8.0, I woul
On Feb 14, 2014, at 5:47 PM, David DeHaven wrote:
>
> What Java version are you testing?
Command line I show...
/usr/libexec/java_home --exec java -version
java version "1.7.0_40"
Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.7.0_40-b43)
Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 24.0-b56, mixed mode
> Is the AppleScript engine no longer not even the default one but no longer
> shipped?
> My HalfPipe application has some launch dependencies on it being there. It
> was throwing NPE's apparently not getting the engine.
> I stuck in some code to list out available engines and get…
What Java ve
On Feb 13, 2014, at 7:49 PM, Michael Hall wrote:
> Is the AppleScript engine no longer not even the default one but no longer
> shipped?
Not seeing a reply here.
Is there a more appropriate forum for OS X specific java questions now?
Michael Hall
trz nio.2 for OS X http://www195.pair.com/mik3
On 14/02/2014 11:41, Michael Hall wrote:
I was under the impressions that however bad my code was it shouldn't cause
Java to crash in this way, is that not correct ?
I believe that is the theory. So you probably did hit on at least an edge case
which the jdk didn't handle as well as you'd hop
>
> I was under the impressions that however bad my code was it shouldn't cause
> Java to crash in this way, is that not correct ?
I believe that is the theory. So you probably did hit on at least an edge case
which the jdk didn't handle as well as you'd hope - if not a actual jdk bug.
>
> B
On 14/02/2014 11:16, Michael Hall wrote:
Not sure what you mean by update? If you have a bug report?
The above sort of suggests you have something looping or too recursive going on
with the native gui thread. Probably in or calling into native.
I just meant do you know about this issue. I was u
On Feb 14, 2014, at 4:58 AM, Paul Taylor wrote:
> Crashed Thread: 0 AppKit Thread Dispatch queue: com.apple.main-thread
>
> Exception Type: EXC_BAD_ACCESS (SIGABRT)
> Exception Codes: KERN_PROTECTION_FAILURE at 0x0001043d5000
>
> Application Specific Information:
> *** Terminating app d
On 2/14/14 2:32 PM, Alexander Scherbatiy wrote:
On 2/14/2014 2:12 AM, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
Hi, Alexander.
Did you check option of loading of the picture on demand?Since most
of the time x2 version is useless on non hdpi and vice versa.
Yes but in this particular case menu items will be painte
On 2/14/2014 2:12 AM, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
Hi, Alexander.
Did you check option of loading of the picture on demand?Since most of
the time x2 version is useless on non hdpi and vice versa.
It's not quite true.
MacOSX choses a necessary image representation based on the current
transfo
11 matches
Mail list logo
