On Nov 13, 2010, at 6:03 PM, Ashley Aitken wrote:
> With regards to Chrome, I try it occasionally, but Safari seems much more
> polished (Top Sites, look-and-feel), and I still sync bookmarks with
> MobileMe, although perhaps I should try Delicious again.
Isn't Chrome's "Most Visited" identica
On 2010-11-13 10:43 , Scot Hacker wrote:
Out of curiosity, what remaining reasons are there to use Safari or Firefox
when Chrome is available? I find Chrome SO much faster and more stable than
either of them, and the Chrome extensions landscape has really matured. I
haven't launched FF or Saf
My big firefox extensions are Stylish and NoScript. For me, these are
musts -- too many web sites are unreadable without either forcing
large fonts everywhere (breaking a lot of formatting), and script
control is a safety concern for me. (Hey, you run anti-virus on your
x86 system, right?)
Next is
Thanks all.
I'll try ClickToFlash (or removing Flash entirely).
You're right Steve (about the tabs and processes), IIRC Safari only runs
(certain?) extensions in separate processes (I see the Safari Flash process
quite often).
With regards to Chrome, I try it occasionally, but Safari seem
On 2010-11-13 12:31 , Jonathon Kuo wrote:
One thing that bugs me about Safari is that if you have multiple windows with
many tabs, there's no way to find the tab you're looking for except by visiting
each window.
i handle that by making each window have a logical grouping of topics
Also, u
On Nov 13, 2010, at 9:43 AM, Scot Hacker wrote:
> Out of curiosity, what remaining reasons are there to use Safari or Firefox
> when Chrome is available? I find Chrome SO much faster and more stable than
> either of them, and the Chrome extensions landscape has really matured. I
> haven't lau
On Nov 13, 2010, at 10:18 AM, Kevin Callahan wrote:
> Interesting ... I just installed the latest version of Chrome for Mac and it
> was slower than Safari for every page I went to (cursory test).
> I do have ClickToFlash installed for Safari, maybe that's why?
> Not a scientific test, mmv
Hm
I would have said extensions . . .until you sad that the Chrome had caught up .
. .guess I need to look and see if I can replicate all of the extensions I care
about with Chrome.
On Nov 13, 2010, at 12:43 PM, Scot Hacker wrote:
> Out of curiosity, what remaining reasons are there to use Safari
On Nov 13, 2010, at 9:43 AM, Scot Hacker wrote:
> Out of curiosity, what remaining reasons are there to use Safari or Firefox
> when Chrome is available? I find Chrome SO much faster and more stable than
> either of them, and the Chrome extensions landscape has really matured. I
> haven't lau
Out of curiosity, what remaining reasons are there to use Safari or Firefox
when Chrome is available? I find Chrome SO much faster and more stable than
either of them, and the Chrome extensions landscape has really matured. I
haven't launched FF or Safari in many months.
./s
___
On 2010-11-12 23:21 , Ashley Aitken wrote:
My MacBook Pro (with only 4GB) has been running quite slow lately and,
particularly, I've noticed Safari has become really slow, even to switch
between tabs and/or close tabs (taking many seconds, e.g 5-10).
i've had a similar problem intermittently,
Install ClickToFlash and see if it goes away.
On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 6:21 AM, Ashley Aitken wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> My MacBook Pro (with only 4GB) has been running quite slow lately and,
> particularly, I've noticed Safari has become really slow, even to switch
> between tabs and/or close tabs (
Tried disabling flash ?
from my iPad
On 13.11.2010, at 07:21, Ashley Aitken wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> My MacBook Pro (with only 4GB) has been running quite slow lately and,
> particularly, I've noticed Safari has become really slow, even to switch
> between tabs and/or close tabs (taking many
13 matches
Mail list logo
