When using port selfupdate on platforms other than Mac OS X
(such as Darwin, FreeBSD, Linux and probably most others too)
it fails to find Foundation unless you set the environment up:
checking for Apple Objective-C runtime... no
checking for GNU Objective C runtime... yes
configure: Using GNU
On Aug 10, 2007, at 18:17, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
I'm trying to figure out why you don't just fetch from CVS all the
time
Why do we allow fetching from CVS in the standard ports tree? There's
no way to validate the downloaded files (ie, checksums), and it's
completely non-deterministic.
On Aug 12, 2007, at 05:59, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Revision: 27700
http://trac.macosforge.org/projects/macports/changeset/27700
Author: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007-08-12 03:59:12 -0700 (Sun, 12 Aug 2007)
Log Message:
---
Add dependency on monotone and update other
On Aug 13, 2007, at 17:05, N_Ox wrote:
Le 14 août 07 à 01:49, Landon Fuller a écrit :
On Aug 10, 2007, at 18:17, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
I'm trying to figure out why you don't just fetch from CVS all
the time
Why do we allow fetching from CVS in the standard ports tree?
There's no way
On Aug 12, 2007, at 10:40, N_Ox wrote:
Le 12 août 07 à 16:39, Randall Wood a écrit :
On 12 Aug 2007, at 10:23, N_Ox wrote:
Le 12 août 07 à 15:57, Randall Wood a écrit :
What would be the best way to check for darwin platforms with a
version less than 8 in a Portfile?
On 12 Aug 2007, at
Le 14 août 07 à 02:54, Ryan Schmidt a écrit :
On Aug 12, 2007, at 10:40, N_Ox wrote:
Le 12 août 07 à 16:39, Randall Wood a écrit :
On 12 Aug 2007, at 10:23, N_Ox wrote:
Le 12 août 07 à 15:57, Randall Wood a écrit :
What would be the best way to check for darwin platforms with a
Le 14 août 07 à 02:19, Landon Fuller a écrit :
On Aug 13, 2007, at 17:05, N_Ox wrote:
Le 14 août 07 à 01:49, Landon Fuller a écrit :
On Aug 10, 2007, at 18:17, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
I'm trying to figure out why you don't just fetch from CVS all
the time
Why do we allow fetching from
Le 14 août 07 à 03:17, Randall Wood a écrit :
I have noticed that almost 1840 ports have configure.args set to
install man pages in ${prefix}/share/man instead of the default
location ${prefix}/man and that the mtree-violation code does not
like ${prefix}/man.
Can we allow ${prefix}/man
N_Ox [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Beats me. This statement is not documented in man portfile or
in the guide at http://geeklair.net/new_macports_guide
This is a standard TCL procedure, see return(n).
I'm not familiar with standard TCL procedures, and I'd estimate
most port authors aren't.
On 14/08/2007, at 11:17, Randall Wood wrote:
Can we allow ${prefix}/man to be used and perhaps even set it to be
the preferred location for man pages since it seems to fit more
with the UNIX default location?
From what I can tell, all major Linux distributions have moved to
placing man
N_Ox [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
the best link for Tcl reference? http://tmml.sourceforge.net/doc/
tcl/
Mark
A great thanks for your link, way nicer than the official tcl
documentation.
You mean the Sourceforge Tcl link? Is that not the official docs?
I just
Googled it up. But now
Boey Maun Suang [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm afraid that I haven't given much thought to committer docs yet. I
suppose it might fit okay in the MacPorts Project section, but I'm not
completely sure it belongs in the guide and not on the Wiki. I'm
not sure
I like that in the guide, but as
12 matches
Mail list logo
