Re: [28665] trunk/dports/editors/scite

2007-09-07 Thread Daniel J. Luke
On Sep 7, 2007, at 5:34 AM, N_Ox wrote: Shouldn't these paths be absolute paths? I didn't think the cwd was guaranteed to be anything in particular. I'm surprised that the cd command above works. I've always used cd and it has always worked. It works right now, but there have been some

Re: [28665] trunk/dports/editors/scite

2007-09-07 Thread N_Ox
Le 7 sept. 07 à 01:10, Ryan Schmidt a écrit : On Sep 6, 2007, at 07:27, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Revision: 28665 http://trac.macosforge.org/projects/macports/changeset/ 28665 Author: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 2007-09-06 05:27:36 -0700 (Thu, 06 Sep 2007) Log Message:

Re: Problem with the repository: bogus date

2007-09-07 Thread Landon Fuller
On Sep 4, 2007, at 12:03 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: Very sorry! That was my fault. I've now fixed the svn:date property of revision 2 so the log should work again. The timestamp of revision 1 and revision 3 are identical, so I set revision 2 to that same timestamp. (I issued a bad svn

PLEASE READ: Whitespace rules

2007-09-07 Thread Kevin Ballard
Last time this was brought up only one person complained, but it really is a serious problem and we need standards. Therefore I propose the following: * All source code files MUST use soft tabs at a tabstop of 4. No hard tabs are allowed. * All source code files SHOULD have the following

Re: PLEASE READ: Whitespace rules

2007-09-07 Thread Kevin Ballard
On Sep 7, 2007, at 1:44 PM, Blair Zajac wrote: Kevin Ballard wrote: * Makefiles MUST use tabs as it is required by the syntax. Makefiles SHOULD use a tab stop of 4. I suggest using a tab stop of 8. I never have modelines in my Makefile's so seeing a tab stop of 4 would look odd. Fair

Re: PLEASE READ: Whitespace rules

2007-09-07 Thread Daniel J. Luke
On Sep 7, 2007, at 1:31 PM, Kevin Ballard wrote: Last time this was brought up only one person complained, ?? Every few months this comes up. There are a few people vocally in favor of one way or another to do things. I think most people don't care too much. but it really is a serious

Re: PLEASE READ: Whitespace rules

2007-09-07 Thread Simon Ruderich
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Kevin Ballard wrote: Last time this was brought up only one person complained, but it really is a serious problem and we need standards. Therefore I propose the following: If I remember correctly, last time was decided every port maintainer can

Re: PLEASE READ: Whitespace rules

2007-09-07 Thread Simon Ruderich
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Blair Zajac wrote: Why is it that most well known open-source projects have formatting rules that they abide to, even if some people personally don't like them. For example, the Subversion project uses the GNU C coding style, which I don't use

Re: PLEASE READ: Whitespace rules

2007-09-07 Thread Kevin Ballard
* Why have rules for Portfiles? Isn't that the maintainer's prerogative? Yes it is, which is why I marked those rules as SHOULD rather than MUST. Having consistent rules for Portfiles aids reading of Portfiles, especially if the Portfile is marked openmaintainer@ as those are edited by

Re: [28702] trunk/base/HACKING

2007-09-07 Thread markd
macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org writes: Added: trunk/base/HACKING (0 = 28702) --- trunk/base/HACKING (rev 0) +++ trunk/base/HACKING 2007-09-07 18:34:33 UTC (rev 28702) @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@ +Whitespace rules as discussed on the list: + +* All source code files MUST use soft

MacPorts Docs Strategy - Proposal

2007-09-07 Thread markd
The work on the new guide is progressing steadily, but one thing has become apparent. We need to unify our documentation efforts. The manpages proceed on a separate path from the guide docs, and we on the doc team (Maun Suang , Simon Ruderich, and I) think that the man pages should be rewriten

Re: PLEASE READ: Whitespace rules

2007-09-07 Thread Juan Manuel Palacios
I am unfortunately late to reply to this thread, even though it was me who encouraged Kevin to start it. Top posting to make a couple of general comments, I just wanted to state, officially and for the record (and yes, with my project manager hat on), that I am strongly supporting

Re: Problem with the repository: bogus date

2007-09-07 Thread Landon Fuller
On Sep 7, 2007, at 09:43, Rainer Müller wrote: Landon Fuller wrote: On Sep 4, 2007, at 12:03 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: Very sorry! That was my fault. I've now fixed the svn:date property of revision 2 so the log should work again. The timestamp of revision 1 and revision 3 are identical,

Re: Problem with the repository: bogus date

2007-09-07 Thread Landon Fuller
On Sep 7, 2007, at 14:29, Blair Zajac wrote: Landon Fuller wrote: On Sep 7, 2007, at 09:43, Rainer Müller wrote: It's nice to fix typos in log messages. But it could be limited to svn:log for that purpose with a pre-revprop-change like this: The log being unversioned, that still seems a

Re: Problem with the repository: bogus date

2007-09-07 Thread Blair Zajac
Landon Fuller wrote: On Sep 7, 2007, at 14:29, Blair Zajac wrote: Landon Fuller wrote: On Sep 7, 2007, at 09:43, Rainer Müller wrote: It's nice to fix typos in log messages. But it could be limited to svn:log for that purpose with a pre-revprop-change like this: The log being unversioned,

Re: PLEASE READ: Whitespace rules

2007-09-07 Thread David MacMahon
On Sep 7, 2007, at 16:19 , Kevin Ballard wrote: vim: sts=4 soft tab stop is 4 FWIW, I'm partial to :smarttab (:sta), but I haven't compared it to :sts in a while so I can't really comment on the mertis of one over the other. Maybe they aren't mutually exclusive? Dave

nco-3.9.2

2007-09-07 Thread Takeshi Enomoto
Hello, I submitted a ticket for nco-3.9.2 (belongs to science). Thanks. Takeshi ___ macports-dev mailing list macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev