Juan Manuel Palacios wrote:
But I don't know if we could go as far as requesting/enforcing that
submitted patches be under the BSD license.
A lot of the current *port* patches are under different licenses (such
as the GPL license), so that would not be really doable without first
checking a
On Nov 12, 2007, at 00:43, Juan Manuel Palacios wrote:
On Nov 12, 2007, at 1:30 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
I fixed a handful of ports one evening, then got distracted with
other MacPorts issues the next days. I'll continue working on cd
issues as I can, but it'll take awhile. Also, only half o
Hi! You're receiving this email because a MacPorts port you maintain
uses the Tcl command "cd" to change into a directory for some reason.
The "cd" command has been deemed harmful for MacPorts, so a future
version of MacPorts will hide it from portfiles [1]. (MacPorts trunk
already does [2]
Ryan Schmidt wrote:
Hi! You're receiving this email because a MacPorts port you maintain
uses the Tcl command "cd" to change into a directory for some reason.
The "cd" command has been deemed harmful for MacPorts, so a future
version of MacPorts will hide it from portfiles [1]. (MacPorts trunk
On Nov 12, 2007, at 03:58, Anders F Björklund wrote:
Ryan Schmidt wrote:
Hi! You're receiving this email because a MacPorts port you
maintain uses the Tcl command "cd" to change into a directory for
some reason. The "cd" command has been deemed harmful for
MacPorts, so a future version o
Ryan Schmidt wrote:
Or maybe I missed one, in that case I'm thankful for an email or bug
report...
Anders, i386-mingw32-libunicows still uses "cd" in its post-destroot.
Not anymore it doesn't :-)
http://trac.macports.org/projects/macports/changeset/30954
Thanks,
--anders
__
On Nov 12, 2007, at 04:13, Anders F Björklund wrote:
Ryan Schmidt wrote:
Or maybe I missed one, in that case I'm thankful for an email or
bug report...
Anders, i386-mingw32-libunicows still uses "cd" in its post-destroot.
Not anymore it doesn't :-)
http://trac.macports.org/projects/macpo
Le 12 nov. 07 à 07:19, Juan Manuel Palacios a écrit :
So, N_Ox, are we gonna see Frameworks moved inside ${prefix} for
1.6? If I recall correctly from our IRC conversation the other day,
it's the Xcode PortGroup that needs to be tweaked for this path to
change?
Regards,
Citando [EMAIL PROTECTED] :
> Revision: 30964
> http://trac.macosforge.org/projects/macports/changeset/30964
> Author: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: 2007-11-12 05:54:05 -0800 (Mon, 12 Nov 2007)
>
> Log Message:
> ---
> Put rubber in category tex
>
> Added Paths:
> ---
Morning everyone!
This is a heads-up message to let everyone know that in an about two
hours Bill will start migrating both trac & subversion to new
hardware, so those two services will be down during the process, as
explained last week. We'll inform of progress.
Thanks
I filed a ticket requesting TiEmu portfile, http://
trac.macosforge.org/projects/macports/ticket/13267
TiEmu is a TI calculators emulator and share dependencies with TiLP
for that I filed a ticket too.
Andrea
___
macports-dev mailing list
macport
I mangles the revision message (bad whitespace--it does not parse in
the Trac browser correctly).
How do I fix it?
On 12 Nov 2007, at 09:50, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Revision 30968 Author [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date 2007-11-12 06:50:41
-0800 (Mon, 12 Nov 2007) Log Message Refactor the MPIndex an
Juan Manuel Palacios <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>$[juan @macbookpro: macports1.0](858/0,1) -> sudo find /opt/local -
>name macosx.mtree
>/opt/local/share/macports/resources/port1.0/install/macosx.mtree
>
>$[juan @macbookpro: macports1.0](859/0,1) -> sudo find /opt/local -
>name prefix.mtree
>/op
Hi Mark!
On Nov 12, 2007, at 12:58 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Juan Manuel Palacios <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
$[juan @macbookpro: macports1.0](858/0,1) -> sudo find /opt/local -
name macosx.mtree
/opt/local/share/macports/resources/port1.0/install/macosx.mtree
$[juan @macbookpro:
>To see everywhere in your ports where the "cd" command is currently
>being used, you can use a command like this in the Terminal
>(replacing "EMAIL" with your maintainer email address (to which this
>email was sent)):
>
>port file maintainer:EMAIL \
>| xargs grep "[[:space:]]cd[[:space:]]" \
On Nov 12, 2007, at 2:09 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
I originally thought 1) was the best approach too, but from what I
understand that would impose a dockbook requirement on all those
who simply want to build base for whatever purpose, and I seriously
dislike that idea.
[snip]
I would ver
On Nov 12, 2007, at 5:37 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
Only 17 email addresses (not all of which would be committers):
grep "[[:space:]]cd[[:space:]]" */*/Portfile \
| grep -v "system[[:space:]]" \
| sed -E 's%^.*/(.*)/Portfile.*$%\1%' \
| uniq \
| xargs port info --maintainer \
| sed -e 's%^maintai
On Nov 12, 2007, at 3:13 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
On Nov 12, 2007, at 00:36, Juan Manuel Palacios wrote:
Is this something we can make explicit anywhere in any way? I
recently wrote the following in the base/HACKING file:
I thought the decision was to not have a HACKING file and to instead
On Nov 12, 2007, at 5:22 AM, Anders F Björklund wrote:
Juan Manuel Palacios wrote:
But I don't know if we could go as far as requesting/enforcing
that submitted patches be under the BSD license.
A lot of the current *port* patches are under different licenses
(such as the GPL license),
Juan Manuel Palacios <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>we're all just gonna have to agree to not touch trunk/base/doc lest
>our input there is rewritten by their work. Committers/contributors
>are most encouraged to submit their documentation patches/enhancements
>as attachments to tickets in the
MacPorts Development writes:
>Hi! You're receiving this email because a MacPorts port you maintain
>uses the Tcl command "cd" to change into a directory for some reason.
>The "cd" command has been deemed harmful for MacPorts, so a future
>version of MacPorts will hide it from portfiles [1].
Hi Ryan,
I checked the ports I maintain (py-supervisor, py-medusa, py-meld3)
and don't see any use of the cd command. Please let me know if I
missed something.
Thanks,
Roger
On 11/12/07, Ryan Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi! You're receiving this email because a MacPorts port you maint
On Sep 14, 2007, at 7:19 AM, Randall Wood wrote:
ALCON:
Attached is the Portfile and patch files for GTK 2.12.0. Can you
please test before I release it into the wild.
Randall Wood
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://shyramblings.blogspot.com
"The rules are simple: The ball is round. The game last
For some reason this email got held in queue somewhere for 2 months.
Ignore it. Please.
On 12 Nov 2007, at 14:48, William Davis wrote:
On Sep 14, 2007, at 7:19 AM, Randall Wood wrote:
ALCON:
Attached is the Portfile and patch files for GTK 2.12.0. Can you
please test before I release it
On Nov 12, 2007, at 4:31 PM, Randall Wood wrote:
For some reason this email got held in queue somewhere for 2 months.
Ignore it. Please.
Sorry, my fault!
Today I got a notice about Ryan's message on the cd command being
withheld for approval because of the high number of recipie
Hello everyone!
Subversion and Trac servers are now back online and operational,
running 1.4.5 and 0.10.4, respectively, on new hardware. Please give
them a try and feel free to report any findings you have.
These upgrades will now allow us to do some cool things like
installin
On 12/11/2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Revision 30974 Author [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date 2007-11-12 13:47:21 -0800 (Mon,
> 12 Nov 2007)
> Log Message gcj does not compile on leopard -- disable java for 10.5
gcj-mp-4.2 built for me without error on Leopard
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$
On 12.11.2007, at 22:51, Adam Mercer wrote:
On 12/11/2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Revision 30974 Author [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date 2007-11-12 13:47:21
-0800 (Mon,
12 Nov 2007)
Log Message gcj does not compile on leopard -- disable java for 10.5
gcj-mp-4.2 built for me wi
Hi Ryan,
Apology for a stupid question, but I can't get your script to run:
On Nov 12, 2007, at 1:37 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
To see everywhere in your ports where the "cd" command is currently
being used, you can use a command like this in the Terminal
(replacing "EMAIL" with your maintainer
On Nov 12, 2007, at 11:47, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To see everywhere in your ports where the "cd" command is currently
being used, you can use a command like this in the Terminal
(replacing "EMAIL" with your maintainer email address (to which this
email was sent)):
port file maintainer:EMAIL \
Hi Ernie,
On Nov 12, 2007, at 2:52 PM, Ernest Prabhakar wrote:
Hi Ryan,
Apology for a stupid question, but I can't get your script to run:
On Nov 12, 2007, at 1:37 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
To see everywhere in your ports where the "cd" command is currently
being used, you can use a command l
Ryan Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>It should work as given, except for replacing "EMAIL" with your
>maintainer name.
>
>Here's the output I get for you:
>
>port file maintainer:markd \
>| xargs grep "[[:space:]]cd[[:space:]]" \
>| grep -v "system[[:space:]]" \
>| sed s%^/Users/rschmidt/mac
libelf-0.8.9 updated to version 0.8.10. Diff file attached to trac
13272.
Thanks.
--
Jonathan Strine
PGP Key ID: 0x0A02201C
___
macports-dev mailing list
macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
On Nov 12, 2007, at 6:52 PM, Ernest Prabhakar wrote:
Hi Ryan,
Apology for a stupid question, but I can't get your script to run:
On Nov 12, 2007, at 1:37 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
To see everywhere in your ports where the "cd" command is currently
being used, you can use a command like this i
34 matches
Mail list logo