Ryan Schmidt wrote:
On May 16, 2008, at 7:46 AM, Joshua Root wrote:
Port's normal mode of operation is to run as many of the requested
commands as possible and not exit when a command fails. It does this by
suppressing the error status from the commands. This is certainly
incorrect when
On May 17, 2008, at 1:50 AM, Joshua Root wrote:
Ryan Schmidt wrote:
On May 16, 2008, at 7:46 AM, Joshua Root wrote:
Port's normal mode of operation is to run as many of the requested
commands as possible and not exit when a command fails. It does
this by
suppressing the error status from
Ryan Schmidt wrote:
On May 17, 2008, at 1:50 AM, Joshua Root wrote:
Ryan Schmidt wrote:
On May 16, 2008, at 7:46 AM, Joshua Root wrote:
Port's normal mode of operation is to run as many of the requested
commands as possible and not exit when a command fails. It does this by
suppressing
Ryan Schmidt wrote:
Should we change MacPorts to only add the -j argument to the make
command in the build phase, and not do so in the destroot phase?
Sounds like a good idea to me.
--anders
___
macports-dev mailing list
Le 17 mai 08 à 08:56, Ryan Schmidt a écrit :
I suppose I can see the point if you've asked for the installation of
various unrelated ports, that it should continue to install the other
ports even if one fails. But it seems like most people would want
MacPorts to stop and issue and error if an
Anders F Björklund wrote:
Ryan Schmidt wrote:
Should we change MacPorts to only add the -j argument to the make
command in the build phase, and not do so in the destroot phase?
Sounds like a good idea to me.
Yes, this is good. We should also merge it to release_1_6 to get it
included in
On 17 mai 08, at 07:32, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
On May 14, 2008, at 7:19 PM, Rainer Müller wrote:
Alakazam wrote:
Would it be possible to have an octave PortGroup ? That would make
it easier to maintain several octave-forge modules in separate
portfiles, I think.
Yes, in theory. But until
-Sourceforge, gnu, etc., special mirrors go after sorted url list
No. They get mixed in with the other master_sites and sorted.
So if we had this master_sites keyword in port foo:
master_sites \
sourceforge \ (ping resp t9)
ftp://example1.org \(ping resp t4)
On 17/mag/08, at 21:26, Alakazam wrote:
If we agree that that is the correct solution for octave-forge, I can
look into this in the next couple of days.
I'm not sure how to cope with portgroups (they have to be builtin into
macports from what I've read).
I wrote a small script to parse web
Andrea D'Amore wrote:
On 17/mag/08, at 21:26, Alakazam wrote:
If we agree that that is the correct solution for octave-forge, I can
look into this in the next couple of days.
I'm not sure how to cope with portgroups (they have to be builtin into
macports from what I've read).
[...]
I
10 matches
Mail list logo